Literature DB >> 25363575

Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.

Zhi-Chao Jin1, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Jia He.   

Abstract

Publication bias is an inevitable problem in the systematic review and meta-analysis. It is also one of the main threats to the validity of meta-analysis. Although several statistical methods have been developed to detect and adjust for the publication bias since the beginning of 1980s, some of them are not well known and are not being used properly in both the statistical and clinical literature. In this paper, we provided a critical and extensive discussion on the methods for dealing with publication bias, including statistical principles, implementation, and software, as well as the advantages and limitations of these methods. We illustrated a practical application of these methods in a meta-analysis of continuous support for women during childbirth.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  funnel plots; meta-analysis; publication bias

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25363575     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  50 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic role of tumor PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z B Mei; C Y Duan; C B Li; L Cui; S Ogino
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Age-related differences in recall and recognition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nathaniel R Greene; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

3.  Maximum likelihood estimation and EM algorithm of Copas-like selection model for publication bias correction.

Authors:  Jing Ning; Yong Chen; Jin Piao
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.273

5.  A Bayesian approach to assessing small-study effects in meta-analysis of a binary outcome with controlled false positive rate.

Authors:  Linyu Shi; Haitao Chu; Lifeng Lin
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.273

6.  The magnitude of small-study effects in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an empirical study of nearly 30 000 meta-analyses.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Linyu Shi; Haitao Chu; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2019-07-04

7.  The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Betsy Q Cliff; Anton L V Avanceña; Richard A Hirth; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Hybrid test for publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Effect of vitamin D supplementation on fasting plasma glucose, insulin resistance and prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in non-diabetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sitian He; Songcheng Yu; Zonglei Zhou; Chongjian Wang; Yongjun Wu; Wenjie Li
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-03-09

10.  Estimating the prevalence of missing experiments in a neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pantelis Samartsidis; Silvia Montagna; Angela R Laird; Peter T Fox; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 5.273

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.