Literature DB >> 25363262

Percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebral metastases from breast cancer: interest in terms of pain relief and quality of life.

Héctor Manuel Barragán-Campos1, Anne-Laurence Le Faou2, Michèle Rose3, Alain Livartowski4, Marianne Doz4, Pascal Astagneau5, Evelyne Cormier6, Jacques Chiras6.   

Abstract

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is a therapeutic option in patients with vertebral metastases (VM). However its efficacy in pain relief, improvement in quality of life and safety in patients with VM from breast cancer has not been reported. We present a longitudinal retrospective study of 31 consecutively treated female patients with VM from breast cancer where 88 vertebrae were treated in 44 sessions of PV, in which osteolytic, osteoblastic and mixed lesions were recorded. The visual analogue pain scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain pre-PV, at one, three, six and 12 months post-PV. The Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status scale was used at the same time intervals to measure quality of life: 90.3% pain relief was identified with a VAS reduction from 5.7 ± 2.0 pre-PV to 2.9 ± 2.2 post-PV at one-month follow-up (p<0.001) and 0.6 ± 1.0 at 12-month follow-up (p<0.001). In our series 48.4% of patients were classified as having an ECOG grade 0 and 1 pre-PV, which increased to 80.8% at the 12-month follow-up. While 22.6% of the patients were classified at ECOG grades 3 and 4 pre-PV, this improved to 0% at 12 months follow-up. The morbidity rate for this procedure was 12.9% immediately and only 3.2% at 30 days post-PV with all complications being resolved medically or with CT-guided infiltration. PV is a safe procedure with a high efficacy in pain relief, and improvement of quality of life in patients with diverse types of VM from breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; pain relief; percutaneous vertebroplasty; quality of life; vertebral metastases

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25363262      PMCID: PMC4243229          DOI: 10.15274/INR-2014-10084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  22 in total

1.  Therapeutic effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty for vertebral metastases.

Authors:  Yuji Mikami; Yuji Numaguchi; Nobuo Kobayashi; Sokun Fuwa; Yoshimitsu Hoshikawa; Yukihisa Saida
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. A review.

Authors:  Daniel M Sciubba; Rory J Petteys; Mark B Dekutoski; Charles G Fisher; Michael G Fehlings; Stephen L Ondra; Laurence D Rhines; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-07

3.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Hai-Rim Shin; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Colin Mathers; Donald Maxwell Parkin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  A prospective study of percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with myeloma and spinal metastases.

Authors:  C Chew; M Ritchie; P J O'Dwyer; R Edwards
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Osteoblastic and mixed spinal metastases: evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  V Calmels; J-N Vallée; M Rose; J Chiras
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Palliation of compression fractures in cancer patients by vertebral augmentation: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ruchira M Jha; Ariel E Hirsch; Albert J Yoo; Al Ozonoff; Marion Growney; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  [Vertebroplasty: state of the art].

Authors:  J Chiras; H M Barragán-Campos; E Cormier; B Jean; M Rose; L LeJean
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2007-09

8.  CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteolytic breast cancer metastases: results in 62 sessions with 86 vertebrae treated.

Authors:  Christoph Gregor Trumm; Tobias F Jakobs; Christoph J Zech; Thomas K Helmberger; Maximilian F Reiser; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  Metastatic spinal lesions: state-of-the-art treatment options and future trends.

Authors:  B A Georgy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Surgical management of spinal metastases.

Authors:  Paul Klimo; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2004
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Metastatic bone disease from breast cancer: a review of minimally invasive techniques for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Dimitrios Filippiadis; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Argyro Mazioti; Konstantinos Palialexis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Alexis Kelekis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-08

2.  Percutaneous osteoplasty for the management of a humeral head metastasis: Two case reports.

Authors:  Guan Shi; Qingshan Liu; Hao Chen; Fei Feng; Pu Jia; Li Bao; Hai Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Percutaneous osteoplasty for the management of a pubic bone metastasis.

Authors:  Guan Shi; Hai Tang
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.087

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.