Literature DB >> 2536217

Rhinovirus infections in an isolated antarctic station. Transmission of the viruses and susceptibility of the population.

D M Warshauer1, E C Dick, A D Mandel, T C Flynn, R S Jerde.   

Abstract

It is commonly believed that living in polar isolation causes high susceptibility to respiratory illness. At McMurdo Station, a US research base in Antarctica, we tested this belief by comparing, over 36 days (August 31-October 5, 1976), the incidence and severity of respiratory illness in 64 men finishing six months isolation and in 136 men just arrived from the United States. The colds in the two intermingled populations were essentially equivalent. Forty-three per cent of the newcomers and 39% of the wintering group reported colds; symptoms and duration were nearly identical between the two populations. Movement of the colds was slow. The newcomers brought in 31 colds; subsequently, only 52 evenly spaced illnesses arose. Incidence of respiratory illness was twice higher in the smaller living units than in the spacious main dormitory. Two nontypable rhinoviruses, McMurdo 4 and McMurdo 88, were brought in by the new population and were the only viruses isolated. Only McMurdo 88 spread, although more than 65% of the men were antibody-free (less than 1:3) to either agent. McMurdo 88 caused an estimated 60% of antarctic-contracted colds. In brief, this isolated polar group was not especially susceptible to respiratory illness, and virus movement through the group was deliberate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2536217     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  6 in total

1.  Improving the health of workers in indoor environments: priority research needs for a national occupational research agenda.

Authors:  Mark J Mendell; William J Fisk; Kathleen Kreiss; Hal Levin; Darryl Alexander; William S Cain; John R Girman; Cynthia J Hines; Paul A Jensen; Donald K Milton; Larry P Rexroat; Kenneth M Wallingford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  [Risk factors in common cold].

Authors:  Carlos Regueira Méndez; Francisco Caamaño Isorna; Bahi Takkouche
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2002-11-16       Impact factor: 1.725

3.  Needs and opportunities for improving the health, safety, and productivity of medical research facilities.

Authors:  M Hodgson; W Brodt; D Henderson; V Loftness; A Rosenfeld; J Woods; R Wright
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Poor transmission of seasonal cold viruses in a British Antarctic Survey base.

Authors:  Tom Everett; Jenny Douglas; Shoshanna May; Simon Horne; Peter Marquis; Richard Cunningham; Julian W Tang
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 5.  The common cold.

Authors:  B Lorber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  The common cold.

Authors:  Terho Heikkinen; Asko Järvinen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.