Literature DB >> 11124125

Needs and opportunities for improving the health, safety, and productivity of medical research facilities.

M Hodgson1, W Brodt, D Henderson, V Loftness, A Rosenfeld, J Woods, R Wright.   

Abstract

Medical research facilities, indeed all the nation's constructed facilities, must be designed, operated, and maintained in a manner that supports the health, safety, and productivity of the occupants. The National Construction Goals, established by the National Science and Technology Council, envision substantial improvements in occupant health and worker productivity. The existing research and best practices case studies support this conclusion, but too frequently building industry professionals lack the knowledge to design, construct, operate, and maintain facilities at these optimum levels. There is a need for more research and more collaborative efforts between medical and facilities engineering researchers and practitioners in order to attain the National Construction Goals. Such collaborative efforts will simultaneously support attainment of the National Health Goals. This article is the summary report of the Healthy Buildings Committee for the Leadership Conference: Biomedical Facilities and the Environment sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, the National Association of Physicians for the Environment, and the Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers on 1--2 November 1999 in Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11124125      PMCID: PMC1240232          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108s61003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  21 in total

1.  Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads.

Authors:  P Wargocki; D P Wyon; Y K Baik; G Clausen; P O Fanger
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.770

2.  Surveillance of work-related asthma in selected U.S. states using surveillance guidelines for state health departments--California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Jersey, 1993-1995.

Authors:  R A Jajosky; R Harrison; F Reinisch; J Flattery; J Chan; C Tumpowsky; L Davis; M J Reilly; K D Rosenman; D Kalinowski; M Stanbury; D P Schill; J Wood
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1999-06-25

3.  Rhinovirus transmission: one if by air, two if by hand.

Authors:  J M Gwaltney; J O Hendley
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The National Occupational Research Agenda: a model of broad stakeholder input into priority setting.

Authors:  L Rosenstock; C Olenec; G R Wagner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Noxious fumes in a medical center: chemical and psychological aspects.

Authors:  E York; M J Hodgson; B W Cooper; C A McKay
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  1998-02

6.  Aerosol transmission of rhinovirus colds.

Authors:  E C Dick; L C Jennings; K A Mink; C D Wartgow; S L Inhorn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Report of an outbreak: nursing home architecture and influenza-A attack rates.

Authors:  P J Drinka; P Krause; M Schilling; B A Miller; P Shult; S Gravenstein
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  An epidemic of pneumococcal disease in an overcrowded, inadequately ventilated jail.

Authors:  C W Hoge; M R Reichler; E A Dominguez; J C Bremer; T D Mastro; K A Hendricks; D M Musher; J A Elliott; R R Facklam; R F Breiman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Health effects of indoor-air microorganisms.

Authors:  T Husman
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.024

10.  Low spatial-contrast sensitivity in dry eyes.

Authors:  M Rolando; M Iester; A Macrí; G Calabria
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.