Literature DB >> 25360071

Ferromagnetism in ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets: from amorphous to crystalline.

Rongfang Zhang1, You Li2, Jing Qi2, Daqiang Gao2.   

Abstract

Two-dimensional materials have various applications in the next generation nanodevices because of their easy fabrication and particular properties. In this work, we studied the effects of crystalline order on the magnetic properties of ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets. Results indicate that all the fabricated samples show clear room temperature ferromagnetism. The amorphous sample has the larger saturation magnetization than that of the crystallized samples, where the disordered grain boundary or defects in the nanosheets are considered to be responsible for the long-range magnetic order. These MoS2 nanosheets with versatile functions may have potential applications in spintronics, nanodevices, and photodevices.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25360071      PMCID: PMC4212940          DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett        ISSN: 1556-276X            Impact factor:   4.703


Background

Magnetic ordering in materials that do not have partially filled d or f orbitals named defect-induced magnetism (DIM) is a topic of interest in recent years [1-3]. Until now, the DIM phenomenon has been finally observed in a broad spectrum of materials, from several oxides to carbon based materials [4,5] and to the transition-metal dichalcogenide with the atomic thickness [6,7]. Recently, as one of the central members in transition metal dichalcogenide compounds, MoS2 with its remarkable electronic properties such as charge density wave transitions in transition metal dichalcogenides make the material interesting from both fundamental and applied research perspectives [8-10]. For example, reports demonstrate strong photoluminescence emergence and anomalous lattice vibrations in single- and few-layered MoS2 films [11,12]. Results also indicate that the single-layer MoS2 exhibits a high channel mobility (approximately 200 cm2V−1 s−1) and current on/off ratio (1 × 108) when it was used as the channel material in a field-effect transistor [13]. Most recently, it is proposed that the indirect band gap of bulk MoS2 with a magnitude of approximately 1.2 eV transforms gradually to a direct band gap of approximately 1.8 eV in single-layer samples [14,15], which is in contrast to pristine graphene with a band gap of approximately 0 eV and few-layered h-BN with a band gap of approximately 5.5 eV [16]. Recently, theoretical studies suggested that, although bulk MoS2 is a diamagnetic material, it becomes ferromagnetic when MoS2 nanoribbons are formed with zigzag edges, defects are induced, or nonmetals such as H, B, C, N, and F are absorbed [17,18]. In addition, formation of magnetic moments was also reported in MonS2n clusters, nanoparticles, and nanoribbons of MoS2 from first principle studies [19-21]. Experimentally, the interesting ferromagnetism phenomenon in nanosheets of MoS2 had previously been reported and the observed magnetic signal is attributed to the presence of unsaturated edge atoms [22]. The weak ferromagnetism was also obtained in the freestanding nanosheets and in the bulk MoS2 irradiated by proton, which increases the TC up to 895 K [23,24]. Further, the existence of magnetism in the pristine MoS2 has been reported despite that there are differences depending on the layer thickness [25]. Although such unexpected ferromagnetic behavior ascribed to edge states and defects in MoS2 has been reported, there are no experimental observations of ferromagnetism in MoS2 with a different degree of crystallization. In this letter, MoS2 nanosheets from amorphous to crystalline were prepared by a hydrothermal method reaction at different temperatures. The structure and magnetic properties were studied. Results indicate that all the samples show clear room ferromagnetism and the ferromagnetism weakened with the crystalline order increasing.

Methods

MoS2 nanosheets with different crystalline order were synthesized by the hydrothermal method. Sodium molybdate dihydrate, 1.5 g, and thioacetamide, 2.2 g, were dissolved together in 50 ml of deionized water and stirred for 2 h. Then, the solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and reacted at different temperatures (180°C, 200°C, 220°C and 240°C) for 24 h. Finally, the products were filtered and washed with water and dried in a vacuum. X-ray diffraction (XRD, X'Pert PRO PHILIPS with Cu Kα radiation) was employed to study the crystal structure. The morphology of the samples was obtained by using the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, TecnaiTM G2 F30, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos Axis Ultra, Manchester, UK) was utilized to determine the bonding characteristics of the samples. The composition was confirmed by an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP, ER/S). The measurements of magnetic properties were made using the Quantum Design MPMS magnetometer based on superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID).

Results and discussion

The XRD patterns for the samples are shown in Figure 1. As can be seen that the sample synthesized at 180°C shows only a broad, weak envelope beginning at about 2θ° =30° and continuing out above 60°, the two maxima approximately locate at the (100) and (110) positions of bulk MoS2. As the reaction temperature increases, the diffraction peaks appear and increase gradually, indicating that the sample begins to crystallize when the reaction temperature increases to 200°C, while the crystallization order of the sample increases with the reaction temperature further elevating. Comparing all the XRD results, it is clear that pressure (reaction temperature) plays an important role in the crystallization of the MoS2.
Figure 1

XRD results for the MoS nanosheets synthesized at different temperatures.

XRD results for the MoS nanosheets synthesized at different temperatures. Further, the morphology of the samples was also captured by the TEM, and the results are shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that all the samples have the sheet-like morphology. The corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) results for the MoS2 nanosheets given in inset in Figure 2a,c reveal the crystallization order of the samples, that is, the sample synthesized at 180°C shows the amorphous nature and the sample synthesized at 240°C had a good crystallization, which is consistent with the XRD results. HRTEM investigation in the edge areas was a common and direct method to determine the layer numbers microscopically. In our case, as in Figure 2b, three to four dark and bright patterns can be readily identified, indicating that the sample is stacked with three to four single layers.
Figure 2

The TEM results for MoSnanosheets synthesized at (a, b) 240°C and (c, d) 180°C. The inset shows the corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) result.

The TEM results for MoSnanosheets synthesized at (a, b) 240°C and (c, d) 180°C. The inset shows the corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) result. The bonding characteristics and the composition of the MoS2 nanosheets were captured by XPS, and the representative results are shown in Figure 3a. Besides element of C, the wide XPS spectra of the MoS2 nanosheets (240°C) show only signals arising from elements Mo and S. Note that the appearance of some O element may be caused by the surface-adsorbed CO2 and O2. The Mo 3d XPS spectrum of MoS2 nanosheets in Figure 3b shows two strong peaks at 229.3 and 232.5 eV, attributed to the doublet Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2. The peaks, corresponding to the S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2 orbital of divalent sulfide ions (S2−), are observed at 163.3 and 162 eV, as shown in Figure 3c. All these results are consistent with the reported values for MoS2 crystal [11].
Figure 3

The XPS results for the MoSnanosheets synthesized at 240°C. (a) The survey spectrum, high resolution scan of (b) Mo 3d and (c) S 2p.

The XPS results for the MoSnanosheets synthesized at 240°C. (a) The survey spectrum, high resolution scan of (b) Mo 3d and (c) S 2p. Figure 4a shows the magnetization versus magnetic field (M-H) curves for the synthesized MoS2 nanosheets, where the diamagnetic (DM) signal in the high-field region has been deducted. As can be seen form Figure 4b that all samples show clear coercivity and hysteresis, revealing their room temperature ferromagnetism nature. Results indicate that the ferromagnetism decrease gradually as the reaction temperature increases, and the measured saturation magnetization (Ms) for samples are 0.0073 (180°C), 0.0068 (200°C), 0.0046 (220°C), and 0.0021 emu/g (240°C), respectively. Zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) measures are performed on the representative sample which has the max Ms, and the results are shown in Figure 5. The first measurement was taken after ZFC to the lowest temperature possible (2 K), and in the second run, the measurements were taken under FC conditions. When cooling down from 300 K, both the ZFC and FC data follow similar trend, that is, slow increase of susceptibility until 40 K followed by a sharp rise. Note that the two curves are separated in the whole measured temperature ranges, revealing that the Curie temperature of the sample is expected to exceed 300 K. In addition, the ZFC curve shows no blocking temperature in the range of 2 to 300 K, indicating that there is no ferromagnetic clusters in the sample [23].
Figure 4

M-H curves for the MoSnanosheets. (a) M-H curves for the MoS2 nanosheets synthesized at different temperatures, (b) the zoom of the low field region of the M-H curves for the samples.

Figure 5

ZFC and FC curves at the dc field of 100 Oe for the MoS nanosheets synthesized at 180°C.

M-H curves for the MoSnanosheets. (a) M-H curves for the MoS2 nanosheets synthesized at different temperatures, (b) the zoom of the low field region of the M-H curves for the samples. ZFC and FC curves at the dc field of 100 Oe for the MoS nanosheets synthesized at 180°C. Inductively coupled plasma atomic (ICP) results indicate that the contents of the magnetic elements in our MoS2 nanosheets (shown in Table 1) are less than 5 ppm. The low contents have been confirmed to have no influence on the observed FM of the samples. Therefore, it is suggested that the observed ferromagnetism here in ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets is intrinsic. Recently, similar ferromagnetic nature was also observed in other layered materials like exfoliated WS2 nanosheets [26], where the magnetism is considered arising from the unsaturated central metal atom due to partially filled d orbitals. In our case, the amorphous MoS2 nanosheets may have more defect centers and edges, which would be associated with the undercoordinated Mo atoms, resulting in partially filled d orbitals. The high concentration of such edges and defects in our samples could be one of the possible reasons for the observation of ferromagnetism.
Table 1

ICP results for the MoS nanosheets

Element content (ppm)FeCoNiMnCr
First
2.8
1.8
0.8
0.2
1.4
Second2.51.80.90.31.5
ICP results for the MoS nanosheets

Conclusions

The ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets with different crystalline order were fabricated, and their magnetic properties were studied. Results indicate that all the fabricated samples show clear room ferromagnetism and the amorphous sample has larger saturation magnetization owing to having more disordered grain boundary or defects. This unusual ferromagnetism may open perspectives for its application in spintronics devices.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

RZ carried out the synthesis and characterization of the samples, analyzed the results, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GD participated in the design, preparation, and discussion of this study. YL contributed ideas for the growth of the samples and revised the manuscript. JQ supervised the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  17 in total

1.  Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors.

Authors:  Zongyou Yin; Hai Li; Hong Li; Lin Jiang; Yumeng Shi; Yinghui Sun; Gang Lu; Qing Zhang; Xiaodong Chen; Hua Zhang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Ferromagnetic spin coupling of 2p impurities in band insulators stabilized by an intersite Coulomb interaction: nitrogen-doped MgO.

Authors:  I Slipukhina; Ph Mavropoulos; S Blügel; M Ležaić
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Half-metallic ferromagnetism in synthetic Co9Se8 nanosheets with atomic thickness.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhang; Jiajia Zhang; Jinyang Zhao; Bicai Pan; Mingguang Kong; Jing Chen; Yi Xie
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  A density functional study of strong local magnetism creation on MoS2 nanoribbon by sulfur vacancy.

Authors:  Reza Shidpour; Merhrdad Manteghian
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 7.790

5.  Anomalous lattice vibrations of single- and few-layer MoS2.

Authors:  Changgu Lee; Hugen Yan; Louis E Brus; Tony F Heinz; James Hone; Sunmin Ryu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Magnetic molybdenum disulfide nanosheet films.

Authors:  Jia Zhang; Jia Mei Soon; Kian Ping Loh; Jianhua Yin; Jun Ding; Michael B Sullivian; Ping Wu
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Sketched oxide single-electron transistor.

Authors:  Guanglei Cheng; Pablo F Siles; Feng Bi; Cheng Cen; Daniela F Bogorin; Chung Wung Bark; Chad M Folkman; Jae-Wan Park; Chang-Beom Eom; Gilberto Medeiros-Ribeiro; Jeremy Levy
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2.

Authors:  Andrea Splendiani; Liang Sun; Yuanbo Zhang; Tianshu Li; Jonghwan Kim; Chi-Yung Chim; Giulia Galli; Feng Wang
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Ferromagnetism in freestanding MoS2 nanosheets.

Authors:  Daqiang Gao; Mingsu Si; Jinyun Li; Jing Zhang; Zhipeng Zhang; Zhaolong Yang; Desheng Xue
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 4.703

10.  Ferromagnetism in exfoliated tungsten disulfide nanosheets.

Authors:  Xingze Mao; Yan Xu; Qixin Xue; Weixiao Wang; Daqiang Gao
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.703

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Strain-Modulated Magnetism in MoS2.

Authors:  Hongtao Ren; Gang Xiang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 5.719

2.  Enhanced optical, magnetic and hydrogen evolution reaction properties of Mo1-x Ni x S2 nanoflakes.

Authors:  Levna Chacko; Pankaj Kumar Rastogi; Tharangattu N Narayanan; M K Jayaraj; P M Aneesh
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Substitution of copper atoms into defect-rich molybdenum sulfides and their electrocatalytic activity.

Authors:  Zixing Wang; Harikishan Kannan; Tonghui Su; Jayashree Swaminathan; Sharmila N Shirodkar; Francisco C Robles Hernandez; Hector Calderon Benavides; Robert Vajtai; Boris I Yakobson; Ashokkumar Meiyazhagan; Pulickel M Ajayan
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-01-26

4.  Ferromagnetism modulation by ultralow current in a two-dimensional polycrystalline molybdenum disulphide atomic layered structure.

Authors:  Iriya Muneta; Takanori Shirokura; Pham Nam Hai; Kuniyuki Kakushima; Kazuo Tsutsui; Hitoshi Wakabayashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  The High Coercivity Field in Chemically Bonded WSe2/MoSe2 Powder.

Authors:  Shiu-Ming Huang; Pin-Cyuan Chen; Pin-Cing Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.