Kyung-Jo Kim1, Yedaun Lee, Seong Ho Park, Bo-Kyeong Kang, Nieun Seo, Suk-Kyun Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Sang Hyoung Park, So Yeon Kim, Seunghee Baek, Hyun Kwon Ha. 1. *Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; †Department of Radiology, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea; ‡Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; and §Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a novel technique to evaluate bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD). It is unknown whether and how DWI adds to the accuracy of conventional magnetic resonance enterography (MRE). METHODS: Fifty consecutive adults suspected of CD prospectively underwent clinical assessment, conventional MRE and DWI at b = 900 sec/mm without water enema, and ileocolonoscopy within 1 week. MRE images were interpreted with proper blinding. Forty-four patients finally diagnosed with CD (male:female, 34:10; 26.9 ± 6.1 yr) were analyzed. The per-segment accuracy of MRE for diagnosing active CD was assessed in the terminal ileum, right colon, and rectum using location-by-location matching with endoscopy as the reference standard. RESULTS: The study evaluated 58 bowel segments with deep or superficial ulcers, 34 with aphthae, erythema, or edema only, and 35 without inflammation. Conventional MRE + DWI was more sensitive for bowel inflammation than conventional MRE alone (83% [76/92] versus 62% [57/92]; P = 0.001) largely because of additional detection of aphthae, erythema, or edema. The sensitivities for deep and overt ulcers were similar regardless of DWI, ranging from 88% to 97%. Conventional MRE + DWI was less specific than conventional MRE alone (60% [21/35] versus 94% [33/35]; P < 0.001), mostly because of many false positives in the colorectum. Positive DWI findings in the bowel showing active inflammation on conventional MRE were associated with higher Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity score (P = 0.021) and deep ulcers (P = 0.01; diagnostic odds ratio, 12). CONCLUSIONS: DWI performed without water enema is not useful for incremental detection of bowel inflammation. DWI may help identify more severe inflammation among bowel segments showing active inflammation on conventional MRE.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a novel technique to evaluate bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD). It is unknown whether and how DWI adds to the accuracy of conventional magnetic resonance enterography (MRE). METHODS: Fifty consecutive adults suspected of CD prospectively underwent clinical assessment, conventional MRE and DWI at b = 900 sec/mm without water enema, and ileocolonoscopy within 1 week. MRE images were interpreted with proper blinding. Forty-four patients finally diagnosed with CD (male:female, 34:10; 26.9 ± 6.1 yr) were analyzed. The per-segment accuracy of MRE for diagnosing active CD was assessed in the terminal ileum, right colon, and rectum using location-by-location matching with endoscopy as the reference standard. RESULTS: The study evaluated 58 bowel segments with deep or superficial ulcers, 34 with aphthae, erythema, or edema only, and 35 without inflammation. Conventional MRE + DWI was more sensitive for bowel inflammation than conventional MRE alone (83% [76/92] versus 62% [57/92]; P = 0.001) largely because of additional detection of aphthae, erythema, or edema. The sensitivities for deep and overt ulcers were similar regardless of DWI, ranging from 88% to 97%. Conventional MRE + DWI was less specific than conventional MRE alone (60% [21/35] versus 94% [33/35]; P < 0.001), mostly because of many false positives in the colorectum. Positive DWI findings in the bowel showing active inflammation on conventional MRE were associated with higher Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity score (P = 0.021) and deep ulcers (P = 0.01; diagnostic odds ratio, 12). CONCLUSIONS: DWI performed without water enema is not useful for incremental detection of bowel inflammation. DWI may help identify more severe inflammation among bowel segments showing active inflammation on conventional MRE.
Authors: Parakkal Deepak; Amy B Kolbe; Jeff L Fidler; Joel G Fletcher; John M Knudsen; David H Bruining Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) Date: 2016-04
Authors: Onofrio Antonio Catalano; Vincent Wu; Umar Mahmood; Alberto Signore; Mark Vangel; Andrea Soricelli; Marco Salvatore; Debra Gervais; Bruce R Rosen Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-02-05
Authors: Saurabh Kedia; Raju Sharma; Govind K Makharia; Vineet Ahuja; Devendra Desai; Devasenathipathy Kandasamy; Anu Eapen; Karthik Ganesan; Uday C Ghoshal; Naveen Kalra; D Karthikeyan; Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan; Mathew Philip; Amarender Singh Puri; Sunil Puri; Saroj K Sinha; Rupa Banerjee; Shobna Bhatia; Naresh Bhat; Sunil Dadhich; G K Dhali; B D Goswami; S K Issar; V Jayanthi; S P Misra; Sandeep Nijhawan; Pankaj Puri; Avik Sarkar; S P Singh; Anshu Srivastava; Philip Abraham; B S Ramakrishna Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-01-06
Authors: R A Towner; N Smith; D Saunders; S B Van Gordon; K R Tyler; A B Wisniewski; B Greenwood-Van Meerveld; R E Hurst Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 3.598