Elliott D Kozin1, Brian M Cummings2, Derek J Rogers1, Brian Lin1, Rosh Sethi3, Natan Noviski2, Christopher J Hartnick1. 1. Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 3. Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) remains the standard surgical technique for expanding a stenotic airway and necessitates a multidisciplinary team. Sedation wean following LTR is a critical component of perioperative care. We identified variation and communications deficiencies with our sedation wean practice and describe our experience implementing a standardized sedation wean protocol. OBJECTIVE: To standardize and decrease length of sedation wean in pediatric patients undergoing LTR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) methodology, we implemented systemwide change at a tertiary care center with the goal of improving care based on best practice guidelines. We created a standardized electronic sedation wean communication document and retrospectively examined our experience in 29 consecutive patients who underwent LTR before (n = 16, prewean group) and after (n = 13, postwean group) wean document implementation. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of a standardized sedation protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Presence of sedation wean document in the electronic medical record, length of sedation wean, and need for continued wean after discharge. RESULTS: The sedation wean document was used in 92.3% patients in the postwean group. With the new process, the mean (SD) length of sedation wean was reduced from 16.19 (11.56) days in the prewean group to 8.92 (3.37) days in the postwean group (P = .045). Fewer patients in the postwean group required continued wean after discharge (81.3% vs 33.3%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We implemented a systemwide process change with the goal of improving care based on best practice guidelines, which significantly decreased the time required for sedation wean following LTR. Our methodological approach may have implications for other heterogeneous patient populations requiring a sedation wean.
IMPORTANCE: Pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) remains the standard surgical technique for expanding a stenotic airway and necessitates a multidisciplinary team. Sedation wean following LTR is a critical component of perioperative care. We identified variation and communications deficiencies with our sedation wean practice and describe our experience implementing a standardized sedation wean protocol. OBJECTIVE: To standardize and decrease length of sedation wean in pediatric patients undergoing LTR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) methodology, we implemented systemwide change at a tertiary care center with the goal of improving care based on best practice guidelines. We created a standardized electronic sedation wean communication document and retrospectively examined our experience in 29 consecutive patients who underwent LTR before (n = 16, prewean group) and after (n = 13, postwean group) wean document implementation. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of a standardized sedation protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Presence of sedation wean document in the electronic medical record, length of sedation wean, and need for continued wean after discharge. RESULTS: The sedation wean document was used in 92.3% patients in the postwean group. With the new process, the mean (SD) length of sedation wean was reduced from 16.19 (11.56) days in the prewean group to 8.92 (3.37) days in the postwean group (P = .045). Fewer patients in the postwean group required continued wean after discharge (81.3% vs 33.3%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We implemented a systemwide process change with the goal of improving care based on best practice guidelines, which significantly decreased the time required for sedation wean following LTR. Our methodological approach may have implications for other heterogeneous patient populations requiring a sedation wean.
Authors: J A Hannam; L Glass; J Kwon; J Windsor; F Stapelberg; K Callaghan; A F Merry; S J Mitchell Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Jeffrey Vergales; Nancy Addison; Analise Vendittelli; Evelyn Nicholson; D Jeannean Carver; Christopher Stemland; Tracey Hoke; James Gangemi Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Jacob T Gutsche; Zev Noah Kornfield; Rebecca M Speck; Prakash A Patel; Pavan Atluri; John G Augoustides Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Nienke J Vet; Saskia N de Wildt; Carin W M Verlaat; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Miriam G Mooij; Wim C J Hop; Joost van Rosmalen; Dick Tibboel; Matthijs de Hoog Journal: Trials Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 2.279