Joanna Abraham1, Thomas G Kannampallil2, Khalid F Almoosa3, Bela Patel3, Vimla L Patel2. 1. Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: abrahamj@uic.edu. 2. Center for Cognitive Studies in Medicine and Public Health, The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Handoffs vary in their structure and content, raising concerns regarding standardization. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the nature and patterns of communication on 2 functionally similar but conceptually different handoff tools: Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, based on a patient problem-based format, and Handoff Intervention Tool (HAND-IT), based on a body system-based format. METHOD: A nonrandomized pre-post prospective intervention study supported by audio recordings and observations of 82 resident handoffs was conducted in a medical intensive care unit. Qualitative analysis was complemented with exploratory sequential pattern analysis techniques to capture the characteristics and types of communication events (CEs) and breakdowns. RESULTS: Use of HAND-IT led to fewer communication breakdowns (F1,80 = 45.66: P < .0001), greater number of CEs (t40 = 4.56; P < .001), with more ideal CEs than Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan (t40 = 9.27; P < .001). In addition, the use of HAND-IT was characterized by more request-response CE transitions. CONCLUSION: The HAND-IT's body system-based structure afforded physicians the ability to better organize and comprehend patient information and led to an interactive and streamlined communication, with limited external input. Our results also emphasize the importance of information organization using a medical knowledge hierarchical format for fostering effective communication.
PURPOSE: Handoffs vary in their structure and content, raising concerns regarding standardization. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the nature and patterns of communication on 2 functionally similar but conceptually different handoff tools: Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, based on a patient problem-based format, and Handoff Intervention Tool (HAND-IT), based on a body system-based format. METHOD: A nonrandomized pre-post prospective intervention study supported by audio recordings and observations of 82 resident handoffs was conducted in a medical intensive care unit. Qualitative analysis was complemented with exploratory sequential pattern analysis techniques to capture the characteristics and types of communication events (CEs) and breakdowns. RESULTS: Use of HAND-IT led to fewer communication breakdowns (F1,80 = 45.66: P < .0001), greater number of CEs (t40 = 4.56; P < .001), with more ideal CEs than Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan (t40 = 9.27; P < .001). In addition, the use of HAND-IT was characterized by more request-response CE transitions. CONCLUSION: The HAND-IT's body system-based structure afforded physicians the ability to better organize and comprehend patient information and led to an interactive and streamlined communication, with limited external input. Our results also emphasize the importance of information organization using a medical knowledge hierarchical format for fostering effective communication.
Authors: Elliott D Kozin; Brian M Cummings; Derek J Rogers; Brian Lin; Rosh Sethi; Natan Noviski; Christopher J Hartnick Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Brooke Bauer; Annette Rebel; Amy Dilorenzo; Randall M Schell; Jeremy S Dority; Faith Lukens; Paul A Sloan Journal: Med Educ Online Date: 2016-07-18