Literature DB >> 25356091

Dynamic treatment regimes: technical challenges and applications.

Eric B Laber1, Daniel J Lizotte2, Min Qian3, William E Pelham4, Susan A Murphy5.   

Abstract

Dynamic treatment regimes are of growing interest across the clinical sciences because these regimes provide one way to operationalize and thus inform sequential personalized clinical decision making. Formally, a dynamic treatment regime is a sequence of decision rules, one per stage of clinical intervention. Each decision rule maps up-to-date patient information to a recommended treatment. We briefly review a variety of approaches for using data to construct the decision rules. We then review a critical inferential challenge that results from nonregularity, which often arises in this area. In particular, nonregularity arises in inference for parameters in the optimal dynamic treatment regime; the asymptotic, limiting, distribution of estimators are sensitive to local perturbations. We propose and evaluate a locally consistent Adaptive Confidence Interval (ACI) for the parameters of the optimal dynamic treatment regime. We use data from the Adaptive Pharmacological and Behavioral Treatments for Children with ADHD Trial as an illustrative example. We conclude by highlighting and discussing emerging theoretical problems in this area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive confidence intervals; Data-driven decision making; Nonregular inference; Personalized medicine

Year:  2014        PMID: 25356091      PMCID: PMC4209714          DOI: 10.1214/14-ejs920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electron J Stat        ISSN: 1935-7524            Impact factor:   1.125


  25 in total

1.  Intelligent real-time therapy: harnessing the power of machine learning to optimise the delivery of momentary cognitive-behavioural interventions.

Authors:  James Kelly; Patricia Gooding; Daniel Pratt; John Ainsworth; Mary Welford; Nicholas Tarrier
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2012-01-17

2.  The path to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A Generalization Error for Q-Learning.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.654

5.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

Authors:  S A Murphy; M J van der Laan; J M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Adaptive Confidence Intervals for the Test Error in Classification.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Variable Selection for Qualitative Interactions.

Authors:  L Gunter; J Zhu; S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2011-01-30

Review 9.  A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences.

Authors:  H Lei; I Nahum-Shani; K Lynch; D Oslin; S A Murphy
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 18.561

10.  An approach to evaluating and comparing biomarkers for patient treatment selection.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Marshall D Brown; Ying Huang; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

View more
  35 in total

1.  Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Tianshuang Wu; Kevin G Lynch; Inbal Nahum-Shani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Optimizing delivery of a behavioral pain intervention in cancer patients using a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial SMART.

Authors:  Sarah A Kelleher; Caroline S Dorfman; Jen C Plumb Vilardaga; Catherine Majestic; Joseph Winger; Vicky Gandhi; Christine Nunez; Alyssa Van Denburg; Rebecca A Shelby; Shelby D Reed; Susan Murphy; Marie Davidian; Eric B Laber; Gretchen G Kimmick; Kelly W Westbrook; Amy P Abernethy; Tamara J Somers
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Tree based weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment rules with censored data.

Authors:  Yifan Cui; Ruoqing Zhu; Michael Kosorok
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.125

4.  Treatment Burden and Treatment Fatigue as Barriers to Health.

Authors:  Bryan W Heckman; Amanda R Mathew; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2015-10-01

5.  Power analysis in a SMART design: sample size estimation for determining the best embedded dynamic treatment regime.

Authors:  William J Artman; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Tianshuang Wu; James R Mckay; Ashkan Ertefaie
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Q-learning residual analysis: application to the effectiveness of sequences of antipsychotic medications for patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Susan Shortreed; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Entropy Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Binyan Jiang; Rui Song; Jialiang Li; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.261

8.  Efficient augmentation and relaxation learning for individualized treatment rules using observational data.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Eric B Laber; Yang Ning; Sumona Saha; Bruce E Sands
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.654

9.  A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray; Ying Yuan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  TARGETED SEQUENTIAL DESIGN FOR TARGETED LEARNING INFERENCE OF THE OPTIMAL TREATMENT RULE AND ITS MEAN REWARD.

Authors:  Antoine Chambaz; Wenjing Zheng; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.