Literature DB >> 16415310

Combined use of Bispectral Index and A-Line Autoregressive Index to assess anti-nociceptive component of balanced anaesthesia during lumbar arthrodesis.

V Bonhomme1, V Llabres, P-Y Dewandre, J F Brichant, P Hans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the A-Line Autoregressive Index (AAI) response to surgical stimulation during lumbar arthrodesis, as an estimate of the anti-nociceptive component of a Bispectral Index (BIS) guided anaesthesia combined with epidural analgesia.
METHODS: An epidural catheter was inserted in 23 patients allocated randomly to receive ropivacaine plus clonidine (Group R) or normal saline (Group S) epidurally. General anaesthesia was induced with propofol, cis-atracurium and a remifentanil infusion that was stopped 3 min after tracheal intubation, and maintained using sevoflurane to keep BIS at 50 (range 40-60). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, end-tidal sevoflurane, BIS and AAI were analysed from 2 min before to 17 min after surgical incision.
RESULTS: While BIS was maintained at 50, AAI significantly increased from a 2 min averaged value of 12 (4) to 21 (7) in Group S within the first 5 min after surgical incision, but did not change in Group R. Maximum AAI values reached during the study period were significantly higher in Group S than in Group R [38 (12) and 27 (10), respectively]. Binary logistic regression analysis allowed the calculation of AAI threshold values above which the probability of predominant nociception over anti-nociception was higher than 95%. At 1 MAC sevoflurane concentration, a 2 min averaged AAI of 35 or an AAI peak value of 62 were associated with such a probability.
CONCLUSIONS: During a BIS-guided constant level of hypnosis, AAI response to the onset of surgical stimulation significantly differs according to the analgesic regimen. Further studies are needed to refine the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of this variable in assessing the balance between nociception and anti-nociception during general anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16415310     DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  5 in total

1.  Effect of propofol and remifentanil on a somatosensory evoked potential indicator of pain perception intensity in volunteers.

Authors:  Ana Castro; Pedro Amorim; Catarina S Nunes; Fernando Gomes de Almeida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Composite-, plain-auditory evoked potentials index and bispectral index to measure the effects of sevoflurane.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.

Authors:  Anthony G Messina; Michael Wang; Marshall J Ward; Chase C Wilker; Brett B Smith; Daniel P Vezina; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-18

Review 4.  A systematic review of therapeutic interventions to reduce acute and chronic post-surgical pain after amputation, thoracotomy or mastectomy.

Authors:  S R Humble; A J Dalton; L Li
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  Composite auditory evoked potentials index is not a good indicator of depth of anesthesia in propofol-fentanyl anesthesia: Randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.