Literature DB >> 25355477

Standing genetic variation in host preference for mutualist microbial symbionts.

Anna K Simonsen1, John R Stinchcombe2.   

Abstract

Many models of mutualisms show that mutualisms are unstable if hosts lack mechanisms enabling preferential associations with mutualistic symbiotic partners over exploitative partners. Despite the theoretical importance of mutualism-stabilizing mechanisms, we have little empirical evidence to infer their evolutionary dynamics in response to exploitation by non-beneficial partners. Using a model mutualism-the interaction between legumes and nitrogen-fixing soil symbionts-we tested for quantitative genetic variation in plant responses to mutualistic and exploitative symbiotic rhizobia in controlled greenhouse conditions. We found significant broad-sense heritability in a legume host's preferential association with mutualistic over exploitative symbionts and selection to reduce frequency of associations with exploitative partners. We failed to detect evidence that selection will favour the loss of mutualism-stabilizing mechanisms in the absence of exploitation, as we found no evidence for a fitness cost to the host trait or indirect selection on genetically correlated traits. Our results show that genetic variation in the ability to preferentially reduce associations with an exploitative partner exists within mutualisms and is under selection, indicating that micro-evolutionary responses in mutualism-stabilizing traits in the face of rapidly evolving mutualistic and exploitative symbiotic bacteria can occur in natural host populations.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicago lupulina; genetic variation; host sanctions; mutualism; partner choice; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25355477      PMCID: PMC4240993          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  47 in total

1.  Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism.

Authors:  E Toby Kiers; Robert A Rousseau; Stuart A West; R Ford Denison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Plant species differ in their ability to reduce allocation to non-beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  Emily Grman
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  An empirical test of partner choice mechanisms in a wild legume-rhizobium interaction.

Authors:  Ellen L Simms; D Lee Taylor; Joshua Povich; Richard P Shefferson; J L Sachs; M Urbina; Y Tausczik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Pseudomyrmex nigropilosa: A Parasite of a Mutualism.

Authors:  D H Janzen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms.

Authors:  M Doebeli; N Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Biological markets.

Authors:  R Noë; P Hammerstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Temporal effects on the composition of a population of Sinorhizobium meliloti associated with Medicago sativa and Melilotus alba.

Authors:  E S Bromfield; G Butler; L R Barran
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Partner choice in Medicago truncatula-Sinorhizobium symbiosis.

Authors:  Cécile Gubry-Rangin; Marjorie Garcia; Gilles Béna
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Efficiency of partner choice and sanctions in Lotus is not altered by nitrogen fertilization.

Authors:  John U Regus; Kelsey A Gano; Amanda C Hollowell; Joel L Sachs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Stabilizing mechanisms in a legume-rhizobium mutualism.

Authors:  Katy D Heath; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  10 in total

1.  Population structure reduces benefits from partner choice in mutualistic symbiosis.

Authors:  Erol Akçay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Acquisition of Uropygial Gland Microbiome by Hoopoe Nestlings.

Authors:  Manuel Martín-Vivaldi; Juan José Soler; Ángela Martínez-García; Laura Arco; Natalia Juárez-García-Pelayo; Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez; Manuel Martínez-Bueno
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Experimental evolution can enhance benefits of rhizobia to novel legume hosts.

Authors:  Kenjiro W Quides; Alexandra J Weisberg; Jerry Trinh; Fathi Salaheldine; Paola Cardenas; Hsu-Han Lee; Ruchi Jariwala; Jeff H Chang; Joel L Sachs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Tracking plant preference for higher-quality mycorrhizal symbionts under varying CO2 conditions over multiple generations.

Authors:  Gijsbert D A Werner; Yeling Zhou; Corné M J Pieterse; E Toby Kiers
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  No evidence for adaptation to local rhizobial mutualists in the legume Medicago lupulina.

Authors:  Tia L Harrison; Corlett W Wood; Isabela L Borges; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Priority effects alter interaction outcomes in a legume-rhizobium mutualism.

Authors:  Julia A Boyle; Anna K Simonsen; Megan E Frederickson; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Phenotypic and genomic signatures of interspecies cooperation and conflict in naturally occurring isolates of a model plant symbiont.

Authors:  Rebecca T Batstone; Liana T Burghardt; Katy D Heath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  Negotiating mutualism: A locus for exploitation by rhizobia has a broad effect size distribution and context-dependent effects on legume hosts.

Authors:  Camille E Wendlandt; Miles Roberts; Kyle T Nguyen; Marion L Graham; Zoie Lopez; Emily E Helliwell; Maren L Friesen; Joel S Griffitts; Paul Price; Stephanie S Porter
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.516

9.  Genetic conflict with a parasitic nematode disrupts the legume-rhizobia mutualism.

Authors:  Corlett W Wood; Bonnie L Pilkington; Priya Vaidya; Caroline Biel; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-04-13

10.  The Potential for Genotype-by-Environment Interactions to Maintain Genetic Variation in a Model Legume-Rhizobia Mutualism.

Authors:  Priya Vaidya; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2020-10-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.