Literature DB >> 25355472

Prenatal learning in an Australian songbird: habituation and individual discrimination in superb fairy-wren embryos.

Diane Colombelli-Négrel1, Mark E Hauber2, Sonia Kleindorfer3.   

Abstract

Embryos were traditionally considered to possess limited learning abilities because of the immaturity of their developing brains. By contrast, neonates from diverse species show behaviours dependent on prior embryonic experience. Stimulus discrimination is a key component of learning and has been shown by a handful of studies in non-human embryos. Superb fairy-wren embryos (Malurus cyaneus) learn a vocal password that has been taught to them by the attending female during incubation. The fairy-wren embryos use the learned element as their begging call after hatching to solicit more parental feeding. In this study, we test whether superb fairy-wren embryos have the capacity to discriminate between acoustical stimuli and whether they show non-associative learning. We measured embryonic heart rate response using a habituation/dishabituation paradigm with eggs sourced from nests in the wild. Fairy-wren embryos lowered their heart rate in response to the broadcasts of conspecific versus heterospecific calls, and in response to the calls of novel conspecific individuals. Thus, fairy-wrens join humans as vocal-learning species with known prenatal learning and individual discrimination.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malurus cyaneus; embryonic learning; prenatal discrimination; songbirds

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25355472      PMCID: PMC4240978          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  38 in total

1.  Maturation of human fetal responses to airborne sound in low- and high-risk fetuses.

Authors:  B S Kisilevsky; L Pang; S M Hains
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Perceptual learning without perception.

Authors:  T Watanabe; J E Náñez; Y Sasaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Influence of prenatal noise and music on the spatial memory and neurogenesis in the hippocampus of developing rats.

Authors:  Hong Kim; Myoung-Hwa Lee; Hyun-Kyung Chang; Taeck-Hyun Lee; Hee-Hyuk Lee; Min-Chul Shin; Mal-Soon Shin; Ran Won; Hye-Sook Shin; Chang-Ju Kim
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Waking-like brain function in embryos.

Authors:  Evan Balaban; Manuel Desco; Juan-José Vaquero
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Prenatal auditory discrimination in the wood duck.

Authors:  M B Heaton
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 6.  Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech.

Authors:  Johan J Bolhuis; Kazuo Okanoya; Constance Scharff
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Development of heart rate responses to acoustic stimuli in Muscovy duck embryos.

Authors:  Joachim Höchel; Ralph Pirow; Martin Nichelmann
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.320

8.  Fetal development: voice processing in normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies.

Authors:  C T Lee; C A Brown; S M J Hains; B S Kisilevsky
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.522

9.  Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young.

Authors:  Naomi E Langmore; Sarah Hunt; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Language experienced in utero affects vowel perception after birth: a two-country study.

Authors:  Christine Moon; Hugo Lagercrantz; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.299

View more
  9 in total

1.  Female in-nest chatter song increases predation.

Authors:  Sonia Kleindorfer; Christine Evans; Katharina Mahr
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Context learning before birth: evidence from the chick embryo.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Andrea Dissegna; Cinzia Chiandetti
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Prenatal environment affects embryonic response to song.

Authors:  Diane Colombelli-Négrel; Sonia Kleindorfer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Constitutive and Operational Variation of Learning in Foraging Predatory Mites.

Authors:  Michael Seiter; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Visual Ecology and the Development of Visually Guided Behavior in the Cuttlefish.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Darmaillacq; Nawel Mezrai; Caitlin E O'Brien; Ludovic Dickel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Prenatal exposure to incubation calls affects song learning in the zebra finch.

Authors:  Andrew C Katsis; Mzuri H Davies; Katherine L Buchanan; Sonia Kleindorfer; Mark E Hauber; Mylene M Mariette
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Embryo movement is more frequent in avian brood parasites than birds with parental reproductive strategies.

Authors:  Stephanie C McClelland; Miranda Reynolds; Molly Cordall; Mark E Hauber; Wolfgang Goymann; Luke A McClean; Silky Hamama; Jess Lund; Tanmay Dixit; Matthew I M Louder; Ignas Safari; Marcel Honza; Claire N Spottiswoode; Steven J Portugal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Adult-like neural representation of species-specific songs in the auditory forebrain of zebra finch nestlings.

Authors:  Katie M Schroeder; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.964

Review 9.  The Role of the Endogenous Opioid System in the Vocal Behavior of Songbirds and Its Possible Role in Vocal Learning.

Authors:  Utkarsha A Singh; Soumya Iyengar
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.