Literature DB >> 23173548

Language experienced in utero affects vowel perception after birth: a two-country study.

Christine Moon1, Hugo Lagercrantz, Patricia K Kuhl.   

Abstract

AIMS: To test the hypothesis that exposure to ambient language in the womb alters phonetic perception shortly after birth. This two-country study aimed to see whether neonates demonstrated prenatal learning by how they responded to vowels in a category from their native language and another non-native language, regardless of how much postnatal experience the infants had.
METHOD: A counterbalanced experiment was conducted in Sweden (n = 40) and the USA (n = 40) using Swedish and English vowel sounds. The neonates (mean postnatal age = 33 h) controlled audio presentation of either native or non-native vowels by sucking on a pacifier, with the number of times they sucked their pacifier being used to demonstrate what vowel sounds attracted their attention. The vowels were either the English/i/or Swedish/y/in the form of a prototype plus 16 variants of the prototype.
RESULTS: The infants in the native and non-native groups responded differently. As predicted, the infants responded to the unfamiliar non-native language with higher mean sucks. They also sucked more to the non-native prototype. Time since birth (range: 7-75 h) did not affect the outcome.
CONCLUSION: The ambient language to which foetuses are exposed in the womb starts to affect their perception of their native language at a phonetic level. This can be measured shortly after birth by differences in responding to familiar vs. unfamiliar vowels. ©2012 The Author(s)/Acta Paediatrica ©2012 Foundation Acta Paediatrica.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23173548      PMCID: PMC3543479          DOI: 10.1111/apa.12098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  22 in total

1.  Temporal pattern and spectral complexity as stimulus parameters for eliciting a cardiac orienting reflex in human fetuses.

Authors:  L J Groome; D M Mooney; S B Holland; Y D Smith; J L Atterbury; R A Dykman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  The roots of bilingualism in newborns.

Authors:  Krista Byers-Heinlein; Tracey C Burns; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-29

3.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; K A Williams; F Lacerda; K N Stevens; B Lindblom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Newborns' cry melody is shaped by their native language.

Authors:  Birgit Mampe; Angela D Friederici; Anne Christophe; Kathleen Wermke
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  An investigation of young infants' perceptual representations of speech sounds.

Authors:  J Bertoncini; R Bijeljac-Babic; P W Jusczyk; L J Kennedy; J Mehler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

6.  Speech perception in infants.

Authors:  P D Eimas; E R Siqueland; P Jusczyk; J Vigorito
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy.

Authors:  J L Miller; P D Eimas
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

8.  [Fetal perception and discrimination of speech stimuli; demonstration by cardiac reactivity; preliminary results].

Authors:  J P Lecanuet; C Granier-Deferre; A J DeCasper; R Maugeais; A J Andrieu; M C Busnel
Journal:  C R Acad Sci III       Date:  1987

9.  Development of fetal hearing.

Authors:  P G Hepper; B S Shahidullah
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.747

10.  Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates.

Authors:  G Dehaene-Lambertz; M Pena
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-10-08       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  42 in total

1.  STUDIES IN FETAL BEHAVIOR: REVISITED, RENEWED, AND REIMAGINED.

Authors:  Janet A DiPietro; Kathleen A Costigan; Kristin M Voegtline
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2015-09

2.  The effects of indexical and phonetic variation on vowel perception in typically developing 9- to 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Ewa Jacewicz; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Verbal Development, Behavioral Metamorphosis, and the Evolution of Language.

Authors:  Peter Pohl; R Douglas Greer; Lin Du; Jennifer Lee Moschella
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2018-11-08

5.  Prenatal environment affects embryonic response to song.

Authors:  Diane Colombelli-Négrel; Sonia Kleindorfer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Altered brain structures in the dorsal and ventral language pathways in individuals with and without developmental language disorder (DLD).

Authors:  Joanna C Lee; Anthony Steven Dick; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  Development of subcortical speech representation in human infants.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The relationship between maternal education and the neural substrates of phoneme perception in children: Interactions between socioeconomic status and proficiency level.

Authors:  Lisa L Conant; Einat Liebenthal; Anjali Desai; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 9.  Prenatal chemical exposures and child language development.

Authors:  Kelsey L C Dzwilewski; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Learning-induced neural plasticity of speech processing before birth.

Authors:  Eino Partanen; Teija Kujala; Risto Näätänen; Auli Liitola; Anke Sambeth; Minna Huotilainen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.