Literature DB >> 25354918

Consistency pays: sex differences and fitness consequences of behavioural specialization in a wide-ranging seabird.

Samantha C Patrick1, Henri Weimerskirch2.   

Abstract

Specialists and generalists often coexist within a single population, but the biological drivers of individual strategies are not fully resolved. When sexes differ in their foraging strategy, this can lead them to different environmental conditions and stability across their habitat range. As such, sexual segregation, combined with dominance, may lead to varying levels of specialization between the sexes. Here, we examine spatial and temporal niche width (intraindividual variability in aspects of foraging behaviour) of male and female black-browed albatrosses (Thalassarche melanophrys), and its consequences for fitness. We show that females, where maximum foraging range is under fluctuating selection, exhibit more variable behaviours and appear more generalist than males, who are under directional selection to forage close to the colony. However within each sex, successful birds had a much narrower niche width across most behaviours, suggesting some specialization is adaptive in both sexes. These results demonstrate that while there are sex differences in niche width, the fitness benefit of specialization in spatial distribution is strong in this wide-ranging seabird.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  foraging; generalist; intraindividual variability; niche width; seabirds

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25354918      PMCID: PMC4272207          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

Review 1.  Individual feeding specialisation in shorebirds: population consequences and conservation implications.

Authors:  S E dit Durell
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-11

2.  The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Richard Svanbäck; James A Fordyce; Louie H Yang; Jeremy M Davis; C Darrin Hulsey; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Structure and mechanism of diet specialisation: testing models of individual variation in resource use with sea otters.

Authors:  M Tim Tinker; Paulo R Guimarães; Mark Novak; Flavia Maria Darcie Marquitti; James L Bodkin; Michelle Staedler; Gena Bentall; James A Estes
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a seabird with reversed sexual dimorphism: the red-footed booby.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch; Matthieu Le Corre; Yan Ropert-Coudert; Akiko Kato; Francis Marsac
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Kerry J Woo; Kyle Hamish Elliott; Melissa Davidson; Anthony J Gaston; Gail K Davoren
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 6.  The ecological causes of individual specialisation.

Authors:  Márcio S Araújo; Daniel I Bolnick; Craig A Layman
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 7.  Social niche specialization under constraints: personality, social interactions and environmental heterogeneity.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Montiglio; Caterina Ferrari; Denis Réale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Sex differences in grey seal diet reflect seasonal variation in foraging behaviour and reproductive expenditure: evidence from quantitative fatty acid signature analysis.

Authors:  Carrie A Beck; Sara J Iverson; W Don Bowen; Wade Blanchard
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Seasonal sexual segregation in two Thalassarche albatross species: competitive exclusion, reproductive role specialization or foraging niche divergence?

Authors:  R A Phillips; J R D Silk; B Phalan; P Catry; J P Croxall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Personality, foraging and fitness consequences in a long lived seabird.

Authors:  Samantha C Patrick; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  State dependence explains individual variation in nest defence behaviour in a long-lived bird.

Authors:  Margje E de Jong; Marion Nicolaus; Rienk W Fokkema; Maarten J J E Loonen
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Shadowed by scale: subtle behavioral niche partitioning in two sympatric, tropical breeding albatross species.

Authors:  Melinda G Conners; Elliott L Hazen; Daniel P Costa; Scott A Shaffer
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.600

3.  Combined bio-logging and stable isotopes reveal individual specialisations in a benthic coastal seabird, the Kerguelen shag.

Authors:  Elodie C M Camprasse; Yves Cherel; John P Y Arnould; Andrew J Hoskins; Charles-André Bost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  A guide for studying among-individual behavioral variation from movement data in the wild.

Authors:  Anne G Hertel; Petri T Niemelä; Niels J Dingemanse; Thomas Mueller
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.600

5.  Inter-individual differences in foraging tactics of a colonial raptor: consistency, weather effects, and fitness correlates.

Authors:  Jacopo G Cecere; Federico De Pascalis; Simona Imperio; Delphine Ménard; Carlo Catoni; Matteo Griggio; Diego Rubolini
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.600

6.  Geographical, temporal and individual factors influencing foraging behaviour and consistency in Australasian gannets.

Authors:  Marlenne A Rodríguez-Malagón; Elodie C M Camprasse; Lauren P Angel; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Changes in surface water drive the movements of Shoebills.

Authors:  Marta Acácio; Ralf H E Mullers; Aldina M A Franco; Frank J Willems; Arjun Amar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species.

Authors:  Ashley Bennison; Joan Giménez; John L Quinn; Jonathan A Green; Mark Jessopp
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.