| Literature DB >> 25353021 |
Amanda M Egert1, James L Klotz2, Kyle R McLeod1, David L Harmon1.
Abstract
The objectives of these experiments were to characterize rumen motility patterns of cattle fed once daily using a real-time wireless telemetry system, determine when to measure rumen motility with this system, and determine the effect of ruminal dosing of ergot alkaloids on rumen motility. Ruminally cannulated Holstein steers (n = 8) were fed a basal diet of alfalfa cubes once daily. Rumen motility was measured by monitoring real-time pressure changes within the rumen using wireless telemetry and pressure transducers. Experiment 1 consisted of three 24-h rumen pressure collections beginning immediately after feeding. Data were recorded, stored, and analyzed using iox2 software and the rhythmic analyzer. All motility variables differed (P < 0.01) between hours and thirds (8-h periods) of the day. There were no differences between days for most variables. The variance of the second 8-h period of the day was less than (P < 0.01) the first for area and less than the third for amplitude, frequency, duration, and area (P < 0.05). These data demonstrated that the second 8-h period of the day was the least variable for many measures of motility and would provide the best opportunity for testing differences in motility due to treatments. In Experiment 2, the steers (n = 8) were pair-fed the basal diet of Experiment 1 and dosed with endophyte-free (E-) or endophyte-infected (E+; 0 or 10 μg ergovaline + ergovalinine/kg BW; respectively) tall fescue seed before feeding for 15 d. Rumen motility was measured for 8 h beginning 8 h after feeding for the first 14 d of seed dosing. Blood samples were taken on d 1, 7, and 15, and rumen content samples were taken on d 15. Baseline (P = 0.06) and peak (P = 0.04) pressure were lower for E+ steers. Water intake tended (P = 0.10) to be less for E+ steers the first 8 h period after feeding. The E+ seed treatment at this dosage under thermoneutral conditions did not significantly affect rumen motility, ruminal fill, or dry matter of rumen contents.Entities:
Keywords: contractions; ergot alkaloids; forestomach; motility; rumen pressure; tall fescue; telemetry
Year: 2014 PMID: 25353021 PMCID: PMC4195290 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Mean values and range between animals for rumen contraction variables.
| Baseline, mmHg | 22.98 | 2.68 | 7.28 |
| Peak, mmHg | 30.28 | 2.78 | 7.29 |
| Amplitude, mmHg | 7.29 | 0.46 | 1.07 |
| Frequency, contractions/min | 2.87 | 0.23 | 0.92 |
| Time to peak, s | 4.06 | 0.42 | 0.85 |
| Relaxation time, s | 5.23 | 0.50 | 1.04 |
| Duration, s | 9.29 | 0.73 | 1.34 |
| Area, mmHg*s | 30.47 | 2.99 | 6.93 |
Mean = overall mean, n = 576.
s.e.m. = standard error of the mean, n = 8.
Range = range of means among the 8 steers.
Figure 1Experiment 1 Results. (A) Mean contraction amplitude of steers (n = 8) for each hour relative to feeding. The mean contraction amplitude of the first 8 h period was higher (P < 0.01) than the second. The mean contraction amplitude of the second 8 h period was not different (P = 0.96) from the third. (B) Mean contraction frequency of steers (n = 8) for each hour relative to feeding. Mean contraction frequency of day 2 was lower (P = 0.03) than day 3. The mean contraction frequency of the first 8 h period was higher (P < 0.01) than the second. The mean contraction frequency of the second 8 h period was different (P < 0.01) from the third. Additionally, the average of the first and third 8 h periods was not different (P = 0.35) from the second. (C) Mean contraction duration of steers (n = 8) for each hour relative to feeding. The mean contraction duration of the first 8 h period was longer (P < 0.01) than the second. The mean contraction duration of the second 8 h period was not different (P = 0.34) from the third. (D) Mean contraction area of steers (n = 8) for each hour relative to feeding. Mean contraction area of day 1 was lower (P = 0.03) than day 3. The mean contraction area of the first 8 h period was greater (P < 0.01) than the second. The mean contraction area of the second 8 h period tended (P = 0.07) to be greater than the third.
Figure 2Water intake by time period, relative to data collection, for endophyte-free (E−) and endophyte-infected (E+) tall fescue seed treated steers. Steers in the E+ treatment group received 10 μg ergovaline + ergovalinine/kg BW daily. In the 8 h immediately before data collection commenced, water intake tended (P = 0.10) to be greater for E− steers. Water intake was not different between seed treatment groups during data collection (P = 0.55) or overnight (P = 0.23).
Mean results for rumen motility contraction variables measured for 14 days in E− and E+ tall fescue seed treated steers.
| Baseline, mm Hg | 29.73 | 27.11 | 0.81 | 0.06 | <0.01 | 0.43 |
| Peak, mm Hg | 36.68 | 34.30 | 0.65 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.29 |
| Amplitude, mm Hg | 6.95 | 7.20 | 0.28 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.24 |
| Frequency, contractions/min | 2.95 | 3.02 | 0.12 | 0.68 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| Time to peak, s | 4.29 | 4.43 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.39 |
| Relaxation time, s | 4.98 | 4.96 | 0.19 | 0.90 | 0.10 | 0.28 |
| Duration, s | 9.29 | 9.38 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.78 |
| Area, mm Hg*s | 28.86 | 31.55 | 1.91 | 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
E− = endophyte-free tall fescue seed.
E+ = endophyte-infected tall fescue seed.
Standard error of the mean; n = 8
Figure 3Frequency of contractions for endophyte-free (E−) and endophyte-infected (E+) tall fescue seed treated steers each day of the experiment. Steers in the E+ treatment group received 10 μg ergovaline + ergovalinine/kg BW daily. The effect of day was significant (P = 0.03), and there was a tendency (P = 0.10) for a seed × day interaction.
Figure 4Serum prolactin concentrations (. Steers in the E+ treatment group received 10 μg ergovaline + ergovalinine/kg BW daily. The effects of seed, day, and the interaction were not significant (P > 0.05).
DM intakes and ruminal contents measured by rumen evacuations on d 15 and DM analysis.
| DM | 9.13 | 9.12 | 0.18 | 0.71 |
| DM 8 h before evacuations, kg | 9.84 | 7.59 | 1.02 | 0.22 |
| DM 32 h before evacuations, kg | 20.37 | 17.93 | 1.10 | 0.22 |
| Percent DM | 15.58 | 16.37 | 0.55 | 0.39 |
| Wet contents, kg | 66.50 | 59.68 | 3.47 | 0.16 |
| Wet contents, kg/100 kg BW | 17.58 | 15.80 | 0.47 | 0.07 |
| Dry contents, kg | 10.32 | 9.77 | 0.55 | 0.35 |
| Dry contents, kg/100 kg BW | 2.75 | 2.58 | 0.08 | 0.22 |
| Dry contents, % of intake prior 8 h | 105.27 | 143.59 | 20.46 | 0.25 |
| Dry contents, % of intake prior 32 h | 50.63 | 55.60 | 4.11 | 0.37 |
Mean DM intake for d 1 through d 14 with pair-feeding management.
Standard error of the mean; n = 8