Literature DB >> 25352122

Optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy following three different protocols of corneal collagen-crosslinking in keratoconus.

Nacim Bouheraoua1, Lea Jouve1, Mohamed El Sanharawi1, Otman Sandali1, Cyrille Temstet1, Patrick Loriaut1, Elena Basli1, Vincent Borderie1, Laurent Laroche1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the efficacy and early morphological changes in the cornea following conventional (C-CXL), transepithelial by iontophoresis (I-CXL), and accelerated (A-CXL) collagen cross-linking in keratoconus.
METHODS: A total of 45 eyes of 45 patients with progressive keratoconus who underwent corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) was divided into three groups: C-CXL (n = 15), A-CXL (n = 15), and I-CXL (n = 15). Patients were examined before surgery and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals following surgery. Density of corneal sub-basal nerves, anterior and posterior keratocytes, corneal endothelium, demarcation line depth, and maximal simulated keratometry values (Kmax) were all assessed.
RESULTS: Compared to preoperative values, the mean corneal sub-basal nerve and anterior stromal keratocyte densities were significantly lower at 6 months in the C-CXL and A-CXL groups (P < 0.001), whereas they returned to preoperative values in the I-CXL group (P = 0.083 and P = 0.909, respectively). The corneal demarcation line was visible 1 month after surgery in 93% of cases (mean depth, 302.8 ± 74.6 μm) in the C-CXL group, 87.5% (mean depth, 184. 2 ± 38.9 μm) in the A-CXL group, and 47.7% (mean depth, 212 ± 36.5 μm) in the I-CXL group (P = 0.006). There were no significant differences between confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography measurements of the corneal demarcation line depth (P > 0.05). The Kmax, corneal central thickness, and BSCVA remained stable during the whole study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Iontophoresis was associated with weaker damage of corneal sub-basal nerves and anterior keratocytes compared to conventional procedures, but the demarcation line was present in less than 50% of cases and was more superficial than with the traditional procedure. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  confocal microscopy; cross-linking; keratoconus; optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25352122     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  32 in total

1.  The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Miraftab; Hassan Hashemi; Mohammad Abdollahi; Shekoufeh Nikfar; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Cornea: New Developments in Image Acquisition, Reconstruction, and Analysis Using the HRT-Rostock Corneal Module.

Authors:  W Matthew Petroll; Danielle M Robertson
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Clinical outcomes at one year following keratoconus treatment with accelerated transepithelial cross-linking.

Authors:  Alberto Artola; David P Piñero; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Roberto Soto-Negro; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Temporal and spatial analysis of stromal cell and extracellular matrix patterning following lamellar keratectomy.

Authors:  Pouriska B Kivanany; Kyle C Grose; W Matthew Petroll
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking using a customized epithelial debridement technique in keratoconic eyes with thin corneas.

Authors:  Nurullah Cagil; Ozge Sarac; Gamze Dereli Can; Emine Akcay; Mehmet Erol Can
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis.

Authors:  Nacim Bouheraoua; Lea Jouve; Vincent Borderie; Laurent Laroche
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 8.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Accelerated versus standard corneal cross linking in the treatment of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty: a medium term randomized trial.

Authors:  Hany A Khairy; Moataz F Elsawy; Khaled Said-Ahmed; Marwa A Zaki; Sameh S Mandour
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Corneal crosslinking for keratoconus in Japanese populations: one year outcomes and a comparison between conventional and accelerated procedures.

Authors:  Naoko Kato; Kenji Konomi; Megumi Shinzawa; Kozue Kasai; Takeshi Ide; Ikuko Toda; Chikako Sakai; Kazuno Negishi; Kazuo Tsubota; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.