Literature DB >> 25350764

Prenatal and preconception population carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in Australia: where are we up to?

John Massie1, Liane Ioannou, Martin Delatycki.   

Abstract

AIMS: To describe prenatal and preconception population carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) in Australia and consider progress towards establishing a universal program.
METHOD: Medline and Embase databases (1989-2013) were searched for all publications with Australian data. Existing programs for CF carrier screening in Australia were reviewed and professional peak body websites accessed to determine recommendations.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Key stakeholder groups believe that prenatal and preconception carrier screening for CF should be available. Health-economic analyses support that CF carrier screening can be cost-effective. There are small programs for CF carrier screening, in Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland. The Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA) specifically recommend that screening be offered to women and couples planning a pregnancy and in the early stages of pregnancy. Other peak bodies indirectly endorse the availability of CF carrier screening. Barriers to screening include not being offered screening, the cost of testing, inequity of access and an incorrect perception that not having a family history of CF lowers risk.
CONCLUSIONS: There is support for prenatal and preconception CF carrier screening by the community, health professionals and peak professional bodies in Australia. The barriers to development of a national screening program could be overcome with greater physician engagement and government support. IMPLICATIONS: In the interest of equity, government funded testing should be routinely offered to all pregnant women and couples planning a pregnancy.
© 2014 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; carrier screening; cystic fibrosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25350764     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  4 in total

Review 1.  Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lieke M van den Heuvel; Nina van den Berg; A Cecile J W Janssens; Erwin Birnie; Lidewij Henneman; Wybo J Dondorp; Mirjam Plantinga; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.351

2.  Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of genetic carrier screening in a changing landscape.

Authors:  Kim C A Holtkamp; Evelien M Vos; Tessel Rigter; Phillis Lakeman; Lidewij Henneman; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Deciding on cystic fibrosis carrier screening: three citizens' juries and an online survey.

Authors:  Paola Mosconi; Cinzia Colombo; Anna Roberto; Giulia Candiani; Maria Teresa Greco; Roberto Satolli; Carlo Castellani
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Physician engagement: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Tyrone A Perreira; Laure Perrier; Melissa Prokopy; Lina Neves-Mera; D David Persaud
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2019-07-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.