AIM: To evaluate the effects of moxifloxacin exposure on the conjunctival flora and antibiotic resistance profile following repeated intravitreal injections. METHODS: Seventy-two eyes of 36 patients [36 eyes in control group, 36 eyes in intravitreal injection (IVI) group] were enrolled in the study. All the eyes had at least one IVI and had diabetic macular edema (DME) or age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Moxifloxacin was prescribed to all the patients four times a day for five days following injection. Conjunctival cultures were obtained from the lower fornix via standardized technique with every possible effort made to minimize contamination from the lids, lashes, or skin. Before the application of any ophthalmic medication, conjunctival cultures were obtained from both eyes using sterile cotton culture. An automated microbiology system was used to identify the growing bacteria and determine antibiotic sensitivity. RESULTS: The bacterial cultures were isolated from 72 eyes of 36 patients, sixteen of whom patients (44.4%) were male and twenty (55.6%) were female. Average age was 68.4±9.0 (range 50-86). The average number of injections before taking cultures was 3.1+1.0. Forty-eight (66.7%) of 72 eyes had at least one significant organism. There was no bacterial growth in 8 (20.5%) of IVI eyes and in 16 (44.4%) of control eyes (P=0.03). Of the bacteria isolated from culture, 53.8% of coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) in IVI eyes and 47.2% CoNS in control eyes. This difference between IVI eyes and control eyes about bacteria isolated from culture was not statistically significant (P=0.2). Eleven of 25 bacteria (44.0%) isolated from IVI eyes and 11 (57.9%) of 19 bacteria isolated from control eyes were resistant to oxacillin. The difference in frequency of moxifloxacine resistance between two groups was not statistically significant (12.0% in IVI eyes and 21.1% in control eyes) (P=0.44). There were no cases of resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in species of bacteria isolated from cultures, or in the frequency of resistance to antibiotics between eyes that had recurrent IVI followed by moxifloxacin exposure compared with control eyes. However, the number of eyes that had bacterial growth was higher in IVI group than in the control group.
AIM: To evaluate the effects of moxifloxacin exposure on the conjunctival flora and antibiotic resistance profile following repeated intravitreal injections. METHODS: Seventy-two eyes of 36 patients [36 eyes in control group, 36 eyes in intravitreal injection (IVI) group] were enrolled in the study. All the eyes had at least one IVI and had diabetic macular edema (DME) or age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Moxifloxacin was prescribed to all the patients four times a day for five days following injection. Conjunctival cultures were obtained from the lower fornix via standardized technique with every possible effort made to minimize contamination from the lids, lashes, or skin. Before the application of any ophthalmic medication, conjunctival cultures were obtained from both eyes using sterile cotton culture. An automated microbiology system was used to identify the growing bacteria and determine antibiotic sensitivity. RESULTS: The bacterial cultures were isolated from 72 eyes of 36 patients, sixteen of whom patients (44.4%) were male and twenty (55.6%) were female. Average age was 68.4±9.0 (range 50-86). The average number of injections before taking cultures was 3.1+1.0. Forty-eight (66.7%) of 72 eyes had at least one significant organism. There was no bacterial growth in 8 (20.5%) of IVI eyes and in 16 (44.4%) of control eyes (P=0.03). Of the bacteria isolated from culture, 53.8% of coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) in IVI eyes and 47.2% CoNS in control eyes. This difference between IVI eyes and control eyes about bacteria isolated from culture was not statistically significant (P=0.2). Eleven of 25 bacteria (44.0%) isolated from IVI eyes and 11 (57.9%) of 19 bacteria isolated from control eyes were resistant to oxacillin. The difference in frequency of moxifloxacine resistance between two groups was not statistically significant (12.0% in IVI eyes and 21.1% in control eyes) (P=0.44). There were no cases of resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in species of bacteria isolated from cultures, or in the frequency of resistance to antibiotics between eyes that had recurrent IVI followed by moxifloxacin exposure compared with control eyes. However, the number of eyes that had bacterial growth was higher in IVI group than in the control group.
Authors: David M Brown; Peter A Campochiaro; Rishi P Singh; Zhengrong Li; Sarah Gray; Namrata Saroj; Amy Chen Rundle; Roman G Rubio; Wendy Yee Murahashi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Stephen J Kim; Hassanain S Toma; Narinder K Midha; Edward F Cherney; Franco M Recchia; Terrence J Doherty Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Seenu M Hariprasad; Kevin J Blinder; Gaurav K Shah; Rajendra S Apte; Brett Rosenblatt; Nancy M Holekamp; Matthew A Thomas; William F Mieler; Jingduan Chi; Randall A Prince Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2005-01
Authors: Abdhish R Bhavsar; Joseph M Googe; Cynthia R Stockdale; Neil M Bressler; Alexander J Brucker; Michael J Elman; Adam R Glassman Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-12
Authors: David F Chang; Rosa Braga-Mele; Nick Mamalis; Samuel Masket; Kevin M Miller; Louis D Nichamin; Richard B Packard; Mark Packer Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Suman Pilli; Athanasios Kotsolis; Richard F Spaide; Jason Slakter; K Bailey Freund; John Sorenson; James Klancnik; Michael Cooney Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 5.258