Trevan D Fischer1, Jin-Hee Wang1, Adrian Vlada1, Jae-Sung Kim1, Kevin E Behrns1. 1. Trevan D Fischer, Jin-Hee Wang, Adrian Vlada, Jae-Sung Kim, Kevin E Behrns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the role of sorafenib (SFN) in autophagy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated how SFN affects autophagy signaling pathway in human HCC cell lines. METHODS: Two different human HCC cell lines, Hep3B and Huh7, were subjected to different concentrations of SFN. Cell viability and onset of apoptosis were determined with colorimetric assay and immunoblotting analysis, respectively. The changes in autophagy-related proteins, including LC3, ULK1, AMPK, and LKB, were determined with immunoblotting analysis in the presence or absence of SFN. To assess autophagic dynamics, autophagic flux was measured with chloroquine, a lysosomal inhibitor. The autophagic responsiveness between different HCC cell lines was compared under the autophagy enhancing conditions. RESULTS: Hep3B cells were significantly more resistant to SFN than Huh7 cells. Immunoblotting analysis revealed a marked increase in SFN-mediated autophagy flux in Huh7 cells, which was, however, absent in Hep3B cells. While both starvation and rapamycin enhanced autophagy in Huh7 cells, only rapamycin increased autophagy in Hep3B cells. Immunoblotting analysis of autophagy initiation proteins showed that SFN substantially increased phosphorylation of AMPK and consequently autophagy in Huh7, but not in Hep3B cells. CONCLUSION: The autophagic responsiveness to SFN is distinct between Hep3B and Huh7 cells. Resistance of Hep3B cells to SFN may be associated with altered autophagy signaling pathways.
AIM: To investigate the role of sorafenib (SFN) in autophagy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated how SFN affects autophagy signaling pathway in human HCC cell lines. METHODS: Two different human HCC cell lines, Hep3B and Huh7, were subjected to different concentrations of SFN. Cell viability and onset of apoptosis were determined with colorimetric assay and immunoblotting analysis, respectively. The changes in autophagy-related proteins, including LC3, ULK1, AMPK, and LKB, were determined with immunoblotting analysis in the presence or absence of SFN. To assess autophagic dynamics, autophagic flux was measured with chloroquine, a lysosomal inhibitor. The autophagic responsiveness between different HCC cell lines was compared under the autophagy enhancing conditions. RESULTS: Hep3B cells were significantly more resistant to SFN than Huh7 cells. Immunoblotting analysis revealed a marked increase in SFN-mediated autophagy flux in Huh7 cells, which was, however, absent in Hep3B cells. While both starvation and rapamycin enhanced autophagy in Huh7 cells, only rapamycin increased autophagy in Hep3B cells. Immunoblotting analysis of autophagy initiation proteins showed that SFN substantially increased phosphorylation of AMPK and consequently autophagy in Huh7, but not in Hep3B cells. CONCLUSION: The autophagic responsiveness to SFN is distinct between Hep3B and Huh7 cells. Resistance of Hep3B cells to SFN may be associated with altered autophagy signaling pathways.
Authors: Mark J Czaja; Wen-Xing Ding; Terrence M Donohue; Scott L Friedman; Jae-Sung Kim; Masaaki Komatsu; John J Lemasters; Antoinette Lemoine; Jiandie D Lin; Jing-hsiung James Ou; David H Perlmutter; Glenn Randall; Ratna B Ray; Allan Tsung; Xiao-Ming Yin Journal: Autophagy Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 16.016
Authors: Alejo Efeyan; Roberto Zoncu; Steven Chang; Iwona Gumper; Harriet Snitkin; Rachel L Wolfson; Oktay Kirak; David D Sabatini; David M Sabatini Journal: Nature Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Scott M Wilhelm; Christopher Carter; Liya Tang; Dean Wilkie; Angela McNabola; Hong Rong; Charles Chen; Xiaomei Zhang; Patrick Vincent; Mark McHugh; Yichen Cao; Jaleel Shujath; Susan Gawlak; Deepa Eveleigh; Bruce Rowley; Li Liu; Lila Adnane; Mark Lynch; Daniel Auclair; Ian Taylor; Rich Gedrich; Andrei Voznesensky; Bernd Riedl; Leonard E Post; Gideon Bollag; Pamela A Trail Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Néstor Prieto-Domínguez; Raquel Ordóñez; Anna Fernández; Carolina Méndez-Blanco; Anna Baulies; Carmen Garcia-Ruiz; José C Fernández-Checa; José L Mauriz; Javier González-Gallego Journal: J Pineal Res Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 13.007
Authors: Pietro Di Fazio; Petra Waldegger; Samir Jabari; Susanne Lingelbach; Roberta Montalbano; Matthias Ocker; Emily P Slater; Detlef K Bartsch; Romana Illig; Daniel Neureiter; Thaddeus T Wissniowski Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-05-17
Authors: Nestor Prieto-Domínguez; Raquel Ordóñez; Anna Fernández; Andres García-Palomo; Jordi Muntané; Javier González-Gallego; José L Mauriz Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 5.810