Literature DB >> 25349031

Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, static automated perimetry, and optical coherence tomography findings for assessing visual pathways in patients with pituitary adenomas.

Nidan Qiao1, Yichao Zhang, Zhao Ye, Ming Shen, Xuefei Shou, Yongfei Wang, Shiqi Li, Min Wang, Yao Zhao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been no studies investigating the correlation between structural [thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT)] and functional [Humphrey visual field (HVF) or visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitude] measures of optic nerve integrity in patients with pituitary adenomas (PA).
METHODS: Patients with PAs were recruited between September 2010 and September 2013. OCT, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and multifical VEP (mfVEP) were performed. Agreement between OCT, SAP, and mfVEP values in classifying eyes/quadrants was determined using AC1 statistics. Pearson's correlation was used to examine relationships between structural and functional data.
RESULTS: In total, 88.7% of the eyes tested showed abnormal SAP findings and 93.7% showed abnormal mfVEP findings. Only 14.8% of the eyes showed abnormal OCT findings. The agreement between SAP and mfVEP findings was 88.9% (AC1 = 0.87). The agreement between OCT and mfVEP findings was 24.2% (AC1 = -0.52), and that between OCT and SAP findings was 21.5% (AC1 = -0.56). The correlation values between RNFL thickness and the functional measurements were -0.601 for the mfVEP score (P = 0.000) and -0.441 for the SAP score (P = 0.000). The correlation between the mfVEP and SAP scores was -0.617 (P = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: mfVEP, SAP, and OCT provided complementary information for detecting visual pathway abnormalities in patients with PAs. Good agreement was demonstrated between SAP and mfVEP and quantitative analysis of structure-function measurements revealed a moderate correlation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25349031     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-014-0613-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  13 in total

1.  Interrelationship of optical coherence tomography and multifocal visual-evoked potentials after optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Hemamalini Arvind; Raymond Garrick; Stuart L Graham; Mark Paine; Con Yiannikas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies.

Authors:  Helen V Danesh-Meyer; Stuart C Carroll; Brent J Gaskin; Angela Gao; Greg D Gamble
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Cognitive functioning in patients treated for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma and the effects of pituitary radiotherapy.

Authors:  Pauline Brummelman; Martin F Elderson; Robin P F Dullaart; Alfons C M van den Bergh; Cees A Timmer; Gerrit van den Berg; Janneke Koerts; Oliver Tucha; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; André P van Beek
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; D Poinoosawmy; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Executive functions recover earlier than episodic memory after microsurgical transsphenoidal resection of pituitary tumors in adult patients--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  T Psaras; M Milian; V Hattermann; C Gerlach; J Honegger
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 6.  Visual electrophysiology in the clinical evaluation of optic neuritis, chiasmal tumours, achiasmia, and ocular albinism: an overview.

Authors:  Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Topographic comparison of the visual function on multifocal visual evoked potentials with optic nerve structure on heidelberg retinal tomography.

Authors:  Omar S Punjabi; Robert L Stamper; Alan G Bostrom; Ying Han; Shan C Lin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Predicting visual outcome after treatment of pituitary adenomas with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Maud Jacob; Gérald Raverot; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Gilles Perrin; Muriel Rabilloud; Caroline Tilikete; Martine Bernard; Alain Vighetto
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Multifocal visual evoked potential in optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy and compressive optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Manju Jayaraman; Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi; Priya Ravi; Parveen Sen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.

Authors:  Mohammad F Mousa; Robert P Cubbidge; Fatima Al-Mansouri; Abdulbari Bener
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-21
View more
  6 in total

1.  Identification of clusters in multifocal electrophysiology recordings to maximize discriminant capacity (patients vs. control subjects).

Authors:  M Ortiz Del Castillo; B Cordón; E M Sánchez Morla; E Vilades; M J Rodrigo; C Cavaliere; L Boquete; E Garcia-Martin
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Using sellar region tumor's size as a predictor of psychophysical and electrophysiological perimetric visual losses: a logistic regression approach.

Authors:  Carlos Augusto Ferreira Lobão; Letícia Miquilini; Breno Simões Ribeiro da Silva; Verônica Gabriela Ribeiro da Silva; Eliza Maria da Costa Brito Lacerda; Alexandre Antônio Marques Rosa; Givago da Silva Souza
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  Machine Learning for the Detection and Segmentation of Benign Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paul Windisch; Carole Koechli; Susanne Rogers; Christina Schröder; Robert Förster; Daniel R Zwahlen; Stephan Bodis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Using Deep Learning for the Classification of Images Generated by Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential.

Authors:  Nidan Qiao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  The importance of the electrophysiological tests in the early diagnosis of ganglion cells and/or optic nerve dysfunction coexisting with pituitary adenoma: an overview.

Authors:  Ewelina Lachowicz; Wojciech Lubiński
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  [Optical coherence tomography as a predictor of visual recovery in patients with pituitary macroadenomas].

Authors:  Sofía Beltrame; Jorge Rasmussen; Pedro Plou; Moira Altszul; Claudio Yampolsky; Pablo Ajler
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-08-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.