Literature DB >> 25348884

Glasgow prognostic score predicts outcome after surgical resection of gallbladder cancer.

Hiroaki Shiba1, Takeyuki Misawa, Yuki Fujiwara, Yasuro Futagawa, Kenei Furukawa, Koichiro Haruki, Ryota Iwase, Tomonori Iida, Katsuhiko Yanaga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation as evidenced by the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) predicts cancer-specific survival in various types of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of GPS in therapeutic outcome after surgical resection of gallbladder cancer.
METHODS: The subjects were 51 patients who underwent surgical resection for gallbladder cancer. For the assessment of systemic inflammatory response using the GPS, patients were classified into three groups: patients with normal albumin (≥3.5 g/dl) and normal C-reactive protein (CRP) (≤1.0 mg/dl) as GPS 0 (n = 38), those with low albumin (<3.5 g/dl) or elevated CRP (>1.0 mg/dl) as GPS 1 (n = 8), and those with low albumin (<3.5 g/dl) and elevated CRP (>1.0 mg/dl) as GPS 2 (n = 5). We retrospectively investigated the relation between patient characteristics including GPS, and disease-free as well as overall survival.
RESULTS: In disease-free survival, advanced tumor stage based on pathology (p = 0.006), positive lymph node metastasis (p = 0.001), and GPS 1 or 2 (p = 0.006) were independent predictors of cancer recurrence in multivariate analysis. In overall survival, positive lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002) and GPS 1 or 2 (p = 0.032) were independent predictors of poor patient outcome in multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSION: The GPS in patients with gallbladder cancer is an independent prognostic predictor after surgical resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25348884     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2844-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Accurate staging for gallbladder cancer: implications for surgical therapy and pathological assessment.

Authors:  Hiromichi Ito; Kaori Ito; Michael D'Angelica; Mithat Gonen; David Klimstra; Peter Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Evidence-based gallbladder cancer staging: changing cancer staging by analysis of data from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Yuman Fong; Lawrence Wagman; Mithat Gonen; James Crawford; William Reed; Richard Swanson; Charlie Pan; Jamie Ritchey; Andrew Stewart; Michael Choti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Donald C McMillan; Joseph E M Crozier; Khalid Canna; Wilson J Angerson; Colin S McArdle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paul Glen; Nigel B Jamieson; Donald C McMillan; Ross Carter; Clem W Imrie; Colin J McKay
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Jaundice predicts advanced disease and early mortality in patients with gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  William G Hawkins; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Leah Ben-Porat; Leslie H Blumgart; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The relationship between the systemic inflammatory response and survival in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  M Hilmy; J M S Bartlett; M A Underwood; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A M Al Murri; J M S Bartlett; P A Canney; J C Doughty; C Wilson; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The relationship between the preoperative systemic inflammatory response and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for renal clear cell cancer.

Authors:  G W A Lamb; D C McMillan; S Ramsey; M Aitchison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with inoperable gastro-oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  A B C Crumley; D C McMillan; M McKernan; A C McDonald; R C Stuart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E F Leitch; M Chakrabarti; J E M Crozier; R F McKee; J H Anderson; P G Horgan; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  A Novel Prognostic Score Combining Preoperative Biliary Drainage and Inflammatory Status for Patients with Periampullary Cancers.

Authors:  Yuki Fujiwara; Koichiro Haruki; Ryoga Hamura; Takashi Horiuchi; Yoshihiro Shirai; Kenei Furukawa; Takeshi Gocho; Hiroaki Shiba; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Preoperative C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio as a Predictive Factor for Gallbladder Carcinoma.

Authors:  Masashi Utsumi; Hideki Aoki; Seichi Nagahisa; Seitaro Nishimura; Yuta Une; Yuji Kimura; Megumi Watanabe; Fumitaka Taniguchi; Takashi Arata; Koh Katsuda; Kohji Tanakaya
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Glasgow prognostic score predicts therapeutic outcome after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Shiba; Takashi Horiuchi; Taro Sakamoto; Kenei Furukawa; Yoshihiro Shirai; Tomonori Iida; Yuki Fujiwara; Koichiro Haruki; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a novel prognostic tool for gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Qing Pang; Ling-Qiang Zhang; Rui-Tao Wang; Jian-Bin Bi; Jing-Yao Zhang; Kai Qu; Su-Shun Liu; Si-Dong Song; Xin-Sen Xu; Zhi-Xin Wang; Chang Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Prognostic value of inflammation-based scores in patients with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Bangjian Liu; Yujing Huang; Yuanjue Sun; Jianjun Zhang; Yang Yao; Zan Shen; Dongxi Xiang; Aina He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impact of systemic inflammation on gastric cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Xuechao Liu; Shangxiang Chen; Jianjun Liu; Dazhi Xu; Wei Li; Youqing Zhan; Yuanfang Li; Yingbo Chen; Zhiwei Zhou; Xiaowei Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Validated Prognostic Biomarker Score for Adult Patients with Nonmetastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Trunk and Extremities.

Authors:  Katja Maretty-Kongstad; Ninna Aggerholm-Pedersen; Johnny Keller; Akmal Safwat
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with operable cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ross D Dolan; Jason Lim; Stephen T McSorley; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Glasgow prognostic score is superior to other inflammation-based scores in predicting survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Hao; Yongqiang Wei; Xiaolei Wei; Lizhi Zhou; Qi Wei; Yuankun Zhang; Weimin Huang; Ru Feng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-11

10.  The Glasgow Prognostic Score at Diagnosis Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Hanno M Witte; Bastian Bonorden; Armin Riecke; Harald Biersack; Konrad Steinestel; Hartmut Merz; Alfred C Feller; Veronica Bernard; Sebastian Fetscher; Nikolas von Bubnoff; Niklas Gebauer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.