Literature DB >> 25348872

Prospective genetic profiling of squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma in Japanese patients by multitarget assays.

Hirotsugu Kenmotsu1, Masakuni Serizawa, Yasuhiro Koh, Mitsuhiro Isaka, Toshiaki Takahashi, Tetsuhiko Taira, Akira Ono, Tomohiro Maniwa, Shoji Takahashi, Keita Mori, Masahiro Endo, Masato Abe, Isamu Hayashi, Takashi Nakajima, Yasuhisa Ohde, Nobuyuki Yamamoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable recent progress in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma, there has been little progress in the development of efficacious molecular targeted therapies for squamous cell lung cancer. In addition to the recent comprehensive genome-wide characterization of squamous cell lung cancer, it is also important to genotype this form of cancer. We therefore conducted the Shizuoka Lung Cancer Mutation Study to analyze driver mutations in patients with thoracic malignancies. Here we report the results of genotyping in patients with squamous cell lung cancer.
METHODS: Based on the biobanking system, in conjunction with the clinic and pathology lab, we developed a genotyping panel designed to assess 24 mutations in 10 genes (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, MEK1, AKT1, PTEN, HER2 and DDR2), EGFR, MET, PIK3CA, FGFR1 and FGFR2 copy numbers, and EML4-ALK and ROS1 translocations, using pyrosequencing plus capillary electrophoresis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse-transcription PCR, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma were enrolled in this study between July 2011 and November 2012. We detected genetic alterations in 40% of all cases. Gene alterations included: EGFR mutations, 6%; KRAS mutations, 4%; PIK3CA mutations, 13%; NRAS mutations, 1%; KIF5b-RET fusion gene, 1%; EGFR copy number gain, 5%; PIK3CA copy number gain, 15%; and FGFR1 copy number gain, 5%. Twelve patients (9%) harbored simultaneous genetic alterations. Genetic alterations were detected more frequently in surgically-resected, snap-frozen samples than in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples (50% vs. 29%). In addition, patients aged ≤70 years old and never-smokers showed high frequencies of genetic alterations.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest prospective tumor-genotyping studies to be performed in Asian patients with squamous cell lung cancer. These results suggest that incorporation of genetic profiling into lung cancer clinical practice may facilitate the administration of personalized cancer treatments in patients with squamous cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25348872      PMCID: PMC4221703          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently been divided into nonsquamous cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Pemetrexed and bevacizumab have been approved for the treatment of nonsquamous cell lung cancer [1, 2]. In addition, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion genes have been identified in lung adenocarcinoma, and are considered as biomarkers for EGFR and ALK inhibitors [3-7]. Treatment for nonsquamous cell lung cancer has therefore advanced, including options for personalized therapy. Squamous cell lung cancer is a major histological subtype of NSCLC, accounting for 30% of NSCLC. However, in contrast to adenocarcinomas, little progress has been achieved in the development of efficacious molecular targeted therapies for squamous cell lung cancer. Comprehensive genome-wide characterization of squamous cell lung cancer has recently revealed some potential drug targets [8-10]. However, differences in frequencies of some genetic alterations, including EGFR and KRAS mutations, have been identified between Asian and Western patients [11], and it is therefore important to assess the frequencies of genetic alterations in squamous cell lung cancer in different ethnic groups, including in Asian patients. We developed a tumor-genotyping panel to screen lung cancer patients for genetic alterations relevant to novel molecular-targeted therapeutics in ongoing clinical trials [12-15] (Additional file 1: Table S1). Genotyping analysis was implemented in the Shizuoka Lung Cancer Mutation Study, which is a prospective tumor-genotyping study conducted in patients admitted to Shizuoka Cancer Center with thoracic malignancies. This paper reports the results of this study in relation to genetic alterations in squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma.

Methods

Patients and samples

The Shizuoka Lung Cancer Mutation Study was initiated in July 2011 to analyze driver mutations in patients with thoracic malignancies. The study subjects were patients with pathologically-diagnosed thoracic malignancies, who had provided written informed consent. The diagnosis and differentiation of squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma were confirmed by institutional pathologists, in accordance with the 2004 World Health Organization classification. When samples were difficult to diagnose as squamous cell carcinoma, immunohistochemical analyses were performed (i.e., thyroid transcription factor 1, p63 staining). Surgically-resected tissue specimens were macrodissected by the same pathologists to enrich the tumor content. Tumor biopsy specimens containing ≥10% tumor content, as evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin staining, were used for this study. All specimens from 129 patients with squamous cell lung cancer were thus considered adequate for genotyping. Surgically-resected tissues were snap-frozen on dry ice immediately after resection and stored at -80°C until use. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, mainly including biopsy samples, were sectioned at a thickness of 10 μm. All the relevant clinicopathological information, including smoking history, was retrieved from the patients’ medical records. We defined “light smokers” as those who smoked <30 packs per year, and “heavy smokers” as those who smoked ≥30 packs per year.

Genetic profiling

We developed a tumor genotyping panel (Table 1) to assess 24 hot-spot sites of genetic alterations in 10 genes (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, MEK1, AKT1, PTEN, HER2 and DDR2), EGFR, MET, PIK3CA, FGFR1 and FGFR2 copy number gains, and EML4-ALK, KIF5B-RET, CCDC6-RET, CD74-ROS1 and SLC34A2-ROS1 fusion genes using pyrosequencing plus capillary electrophoresis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and reverse-transcription PCR, respectively. These genetic alterations were selected based on the articles listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Detailed methods are described in Additional file 2 [16]. Fusion genes were accessed only with fresh-frozen tissues.
Table 1

Multiple tumor genotyping panel

GenePositionAA mutantNucleotide mutant
EGFR G719G719C/S2155G > T/A
G719A2156G > C
exon 19deletion
T790T790M2369C > T
exon 20insertion
L858L858R2573 T > G
L861L861Q2582 T > A
KRAS G12G12C/S/R34G > T/A/C
G12V/A/D35G > T/C/A
G13G13C/S/R37G > T/A/C
G13D/A38G > A/C
Q61Q61K181C > A
Q61R/L182A > G/T
Q61H183A > T/C
BRAF G466G466V1397G > T
G469G469A1406G > C
L597L597V1789C > G
V600V600E1799 T > A
PIK3CA E542E542K1624G > A
E545E545K/Q1633G > A/C
H1047H1047R3140A > G
NRAS Q61Q61K181C > A
Q61L/R182A > T/G
MEK1 (MAP2K1) Q56Q56P167A > C
K57K57N171G > T
D67D67N199G > A
AKT1 E17E17K49G > A
PTEN R233R233*697C > T
HER2 exon 20insertion
DDR2 S768S768R2304 T > A
Multiple tumor genotyping panel

Statistical analysis

All categorical variables were analyzed by χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. All p values were reported as two-sided, and values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Shizuoka Cancer Center (22-34-22-1-7).

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 129 patients were diagnosed with squamous cell lung cancer or adenosquamous carcinoma and were included in this study from July 2011 to November 2012. The characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 2. The median age was 70 years (range: 38–92), and most patients were male and smokers. Histologically, adenosquamous carcinoma was observed in six (5%) of the patients. Well-differentiated, moderately-differentiated and poorly-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas were present in 10%, 53% and 27% of the patients, respectively. Stage I, II, III and IV were observed in 26%, 29%, 26% and 19%, respectively. Surgically-resected, snap-frozen samples were obtained from 64 patients (50%), and FFPE samples from 65 patients (50%).
Table 2

Patient characteristics (overall, n =129)

N =129(%)
Median age (years)70
    (range)(38–92)
Gender
    Male11186
    Female1814
Smoker
    Never32
    Light (pack-year <30)129
    Heavy (pack-year ≥30)11489
Histology
    Squamous12395
    Adenosquamous65
Differentiation
    Well1310
    Moderately6953
    Poorly3527
    Unknown65
Stage
    I3326
    II3829
    III3426
    IV2419
Patient characteristics (overall, n =129)

Genetic alteration profiles

We detected genetic alterations in 40% of all cases. Figure 1 shows the frequencies of genetic alterations in patients with squamous cell lung cancer. The genetic alterations included: EGFR mutation in eight (6%); KRAS mutation in five (4%); PIK3CA mutation in 17 (13%); NRAS mutation in one (1%); KIF5b-RET fusion in one (1%); EGFR copy number gain in six (5%); PIK3CA copy number gain in 19 (15%); and FGFR1 copy number gain in six (5%) (Additional file 3: Table S2 and Additional file 4: Table S3). Of eight patients with EGFR mutation, four had the L858R point mutation in exon 21, and three had deletions in exon 19. In addition, the frequencies of genetic alterations in surgically-resected, snap-frozen samples and FFPE samples from patients with squamous cell lung cancer were analyzed (Figure 2), and the following alterations were detected: EGFR mutation in 8% and 5%, KRAS mutation in 3% and 5%, PIK3CA mutation in 17% and 9%, EGFR copy number gain in 8% and 2%, PIK3CA copy number gain in 19% and 11%, and FGFR1 copy number gain in 8% and 2%, respectively.
Figure 1

Relative proportions of genetic alterations in squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma (overall, n = 129). A: Pie chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations. B: Bar chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations. MUT: mutant, CNG: copy number gain.

Figure 2

Relative proportions of genetic alterations in surgically resected snap-frozen samples (A and B, n = 64) and paraffin-embedded samples (C and D, n = 65) from patients with squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma. A: Bar chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations in surgically resected snap-frozen samples. B: Pie chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations in surgically resected snap-frozen samples. C: Bar chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations in paraffin-embedded samples. D: Pie chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations in paraffin-embedded samples. MUT: mutant, CNG: copy number gain.

Relative proportions of genetic alterations in squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma (overall, n = 129). A: Pie chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations. B: Bar chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations. MUT: mutant, CNG: copy number gain. Relative proportions of genetic alterations in surgically resected snap-frozen samples (A and B, n = 64) and paraffin-embedded samples (C and D, n = 65) from patients with squamous cell lung cancer and adenosquamous carcinoma. A: Bar chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations in surgically resected snap-frozen samples. B: Pie chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations in surgically resected snap-frozen samples. C: Bar chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations in paraffin-embedded samples. D: Pie chart shows relative proportions of genetic alterations in paraffin-embedded samples. MUT: mutant, CNG: copy number gain.

Clinicopathological factors related to genetic alterations

The results of univariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for genetic alterations are shown in Table 3. Genetic alterations were significantly more frequent in surgically-resected, snap-frozen samples than in FFPE samples (50% vs. 29%, p = 0.015). In addition, patients ≤70 years old and “never-smokers” showed higher frequencies of genetic alterations. Also, 75% of patients ≤60 years old (n = 12) had genetic alterations including EGFR mutation in 2, KRAS mutation in 2, PIK3CA mutation in 2, KIF5b-RET fusion in 1, EGFR copy number gain in 2, and PIK3CA copy number gain in 2.
Table 3

Frequency of genomic alterations in clinicopathological factors (overall, n =129)

Genomic alterationsp value
(+)(-)
Age0.027
    ≤70 years3335
    >70 years1848
GenderN.S.
    Male4467
    Female711
Smoker0.035
    Never310
    Light (pack-year <30)39
    Heavy (pack-year ≥30)4569
HistologyN.S.
    Squamous4974
    Adenosquamous24
DifferentiationN.S.
    Well58
    Moderately2742
    Poorly1520
    Unknown24
StageN.S.
    I1320
    II1226
    III1618
    IV1014
Samples0.015
    Snap-frozen3232
    FFPE1946

FFPE formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded.

Frequency of genomic alterations in clinicopathological factors (overall, n =129) FFPE formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded.

Discussion

This study represents one of the largest, prospective, tumor-genotyping studies carried out in Asian patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Genetic alterations were detected in 40% of patients in this study. There have been few reports on the gene alterations associated with squamous cell lung cancer. However, the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network performed a comprehensive genomic analysis of 178 squamous cell lung cancers and reported the following genetic alterations: PIK3CA mutations in 16%, PTEN mutation/deletion in 15%, FGFR1 amplification in 15%, EGFR amplification in 9%, PDGFRA amplification in 9%, DDR2 mutation in 4%, and unknown genetic alterations in 21% [8]. In addition, multiplex testing for driver mutations in 72 squamous cell carcinomas of the lung detected: PIK3CA mutations in 8%, PTEN mutation/deletion in 28%, FGFR1 amplification in 26%, and unknown genetic alterations in 39% [9]. Korean study showed a similar spectrum of gene alterations between East Asian and North American [10]. Genetic alterations in patients enrolled in the current prospective study may reflect the frequencies of genetic alterations in the clinical setting, and suggest that genetic profiling in Japanese patients may be similar to that in North American. Genetic alterations were seen more frequently in surgically-resected, snap-frozen samples, in patients ≤70 years old, and in “never-smokers”. FFPE specimens are subject to increasing DNA degradation as they get older [17], which may account for the difference in frequencies of genetic alterations between snap-frozen and FFPE samples. Squamous cell lung cancer is strongly associated with cigarette smoking [18] and 98% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma in this study were light or heavy smokers. Although all three “never-smokers” showed genetic alterations (EGFR mutation, EGFR or PIK3CA copy number gain), the sample size was too small to evaluate these results. The association between age and genetic alterations is unclear. Multiple genetic alterations were reported to be more common in younger patients with papillary thyroid cancer [19], while younger patients with colorectal cancer showed a high frequency of KRAS mutations [20]. In contrast however, a positive association between EGFR mutation and age was reported among never-smoker lung cancer patients [21]. In this study, PIK3CA mutation was relatively frequent in squamous cell lung cancer, as reported in other studies, while FGFR1 copy number gain seemed less frequent [8, 9]. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is a key oncogenic signaling pathway that functions in cell survival and proliferation [22]. The PIK3CA gene encodes the PI3K catalytic subunit α-isoform and is frequently mutated in some of the most common human tumors. Our earlier study, as well as other studies, found that PIK3CA mutations were more common in squamous cell lung cancer than in lung adenocarcinoma [23-25]. The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase that participates in the regulation of embryonal development, cell proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis [26, 27]. The frequency of FGFR1 amplification in surgical specimens has been reported to be 13–41%, and does not seem to differ according to ethnicity [28-30]. However, the frequency of FGFR1 copy number gain in this study was only 4% of all samples and 8% of fresh-frozen samples. This apparent discrepancy in the frequencies of FGFR1 copy number gain may be a result of the different methodologies used in the studies, and/or the influence of biopsy samples from patients with metastatic squamous cell lung cancer. PIK3CA mutation and FGFR1 amplification both represent potential targets for personalized squamous cell lung cancer therapy, and it may therefore be important to analyze both these gene alterations in clinical practice. A major limitation of this study was that genetic alterations were analyzed using a genotyping panel, rather than by a comprehensive analysis. However, the objective of this study was not only to assess the frequencies of driver gene mutations, but also to assign patients to appropriate therapies and/or enrollment in clinical trials. Our genotyping panel included most gene mutations that are targeted by new drugs in ongoing clinical trials. This study was also limited by intratumor heterogeneity, which may have resulted in underestimation of tumor genetic alterations [31]. It is difficult to obtain multiple lesions by tumor biopsy in the clinical setting, but we intend to address this challenge in the future to aid further progress in biomarker development.

Conclusion

Genetic alterations were detected in 40% of Japanese patients with squamous cell lung cancer. These results suggest that incorporation of genetic profiling into lung cancer clinical practice may facilitate the administration of personalized cancer treatments in patients with squamous cell lung cancer, though further studies are needed to verify these results. Additional file 1: Table S1: Tumor genotyping panel developed for this study. (PDF 243 KB) Additional file 2: Supplementary methods. (PDF 129 KB) Additional file 3: Table S2: Distribution of genetic alterations in each gene. (PDF 106 KB) Additional file 4: Table S3: Distribution of concurrent genetic alterations. (PDF 21 KB)
  29 in total

1.  PIK3CA mutation status in Japanese lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Osamu Kawano; Hidefumi Sasaki; Katsuhiko Endo; Eriko Suzuki; Hiroshi Haneda; Haruhiro Yukiue; Yoshihiro Kobayashi; Motoki Yano; Yoshitaka Fujii
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Alan Sandler; Robert Gray; Michael C Perry; Julie Brahmer; Joan H Schiller; Afshin Dowlati; Rogerio Lilenbaum; David H Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of lung squamous cell carcinomas in East Asian patients.

Authors:  Youngwook Kim; Peter S Hammerman; Jaegil Kim; Ji-ae Yoon; Yoomi Lee; Jong-Mu Sun; Matthew D Wilkerson; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Kristian Cibulskis; Yeong Kyung Yoo; Michael S Lawrence; Petar Stojanov; Scott L Carter; Aaron McKenna; Chip Stewart; Andrey Y Sivachenko; In-Jae Oh; Hong Kwan Kim; Yong Soo Choi; Kwhanmien Kim; Young Mog Shim; Kyu-Sik Kim; Sang-Yun Song; Kook-Joo Na; Yoon-La Choi; D Neil Hayes; Jhingook Kim; Sukki Cho; Young-Chul Kim; Jin Seok Ahn; Myung-Ju Ahn; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson; Keunchil Park
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Effect of cigarette smoking on major histological types of lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S A Khuder
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2001 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 5.  New targets in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shirish M Gadgeel
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Purvish Parikh; Joachim von Pawel; Bonne Biesma; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christian Manegold; Piotr Serwatowski; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Mauro Zukin; Jin S Lee; Anders Mellemgaard; Keunchil Park; Shehkar Patil; Janusz Rolski; Tuncay Goksel; Filippo de Marinis; Lorinda Simms; Katherine P Sugarman; David Gandara
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer.

Authors:  Alice T Shaw; Dong-Wan Kim; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Takashi Seto; Lucio Crinó; Myung-Ju Ahn; Tommaso De Pas; Benjamin Besse; Benjamin J Solomon; Fiona Blackhall; Yi-Long Wu; Michael Thomas; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Denis Moro-Sibilot; D Ross Camidge; Tony Mok; Vera Hirsh; Gregory J Riely; Shrividya Iyer; Vanessa Tassell; Anna Polli; Keith D Wilner; Pasi A Jänne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Assessment of mutational profile of Japanese lung adenocarcinoma patients by multitarget assays: a prospective, single-institute study.

Authors:  Masakuni Serizawa; Yasuhiro Koh; Hirotsugu Kenmotsu; Mitsuhiro Isaka; Haruyasu Murakami; Hiroaki Akamatsu; Keita Mori; Masato Abe; Isamu Hayashi; Tetsuhiko Taira; Tomohiro Maniwa; Toshiaki Takahashi; Masahiro Endo; Takashi Nakajima; Yasuhisa Ohde; Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene amplification is associated with poor survival and cigarette smoking dosage in patients with resected squamous cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hye Ryun Kim; Dae Joon Kim; Dae Ryong Kang; Jin Gu Lee; Sun Min Lim; Chang Young Lee; Sun Young Rha; Mi Kyung Bae; Young Joo Lee; Se Hoon Kim; Sang-Jun Ha; Ross Andrew Soo; Kyung Young Chung; Joo Hang Kim; Ji Hyun Lee; Hyo Sup Shim; Byoung Chul Cho
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Mutation incidence and coincidence in non small-cell lung cancer: meta-analyses by ethnicity and histology (mutMap).

Authors:  S Dearden; J Stevens; Y-L Wu; D Blowers
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a review.

Authors:  Benjamin A Derman; Kathryn F Mileham; Philip D Bonomi; Marta Batus; Mary J Fidler
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  NSCLC as the Paradigm of Precision Medicine at Its Finest: The Rise of New Druggable Molecular Targets for Advanced Disease.

Authors:  Anna Michelotti; Marco de Scordilli; Elisa Bertoli; Elisa De Carlo; Alessandro Del Conte; Alessandra Bearz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Papillary thyroid carcinoma with extensive squamous dedifferentiation metastatic to the lung: BRAF mutational analysis as a useful tool to rule out tumor to tumor metastasis.

Authors:  Andres M Acosta; Michael R Pins
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation status in pure squamous-cell lung cancer in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Lei Zhu; Jie Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  The mutation rates of EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer and KRAS in colorectal cancer of Chinese patients as detected by pyrosequencing using a novel dispensation order.

Authors:  Guohua Xie; Fang Xie; Ping Wu; Xiangliang Yuan; Yanhui Ma; Yunchuan Xu; Li Li; Ling Xu; Ming Yang; Lisong Shen
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06-18

6.  Histologic Grade Is Predictive of Incidence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michelle Levy; Liisa Lyon; Erika Barbero; John Wong; Marie Suga; Danny Sam; Minggui Pan
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 7.  ALK-rearranged lung squamous cell carcinoma responding to alectinib: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mamesaya; Kazuhisa Nakashima; Tateaki Naito; Takashi Nakajima; Masahiro Endo; Toshiaki Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  [Research Advances of Pan-negative Type of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Authors:  Li Sun; Zhicheng Xiong; Chengbo Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2018-02-20

9.  ALK-Positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma Dramatically Responded to Alectinib.

Authors:  Ray Sagawa; Takehiko Ohba; Eisaku Ito; Susumu Isogai
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2018-03-18

10.  Applicability of graded prognostic assessment of lung cancer using molecular markers to lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Hongwei Li; Jianhong Lian; Songyan Han; Weili Wang; Haixia Jia; Jianzhong Cao; Xiaqin Zhang; Xin Song; Sufang Jia; Jiwei Ren; Weihua Yang; Yanfeng Xi; Shengmin Lan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.