Literature DB >> 25348011

Cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease in the UK and Germany.

Evelyn Walter1, Per Odin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, affecting ∼ 5.2 million people worldwide. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine (CSAI) represents an alternative treatment option for advanced PD with motor fluctuation. The purpose of this analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CSAI compared with Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), Deep-Brain-Stimulation (DBS) and Standard-of-care (SOC).
METHODS: A multi-country Markov-Model to simulate the long-term consequences, disease progression (Hoehn & Yahr stages 3-5, percentage of waking-time in the OFF-state), complications, and adverse events was developed. Monte-Carlo simulation accounted for uncertainty. Probabilities were derived from RCT and open-label studies. Costs were estimated from the UK and German healthcare provider's perspective. QALYs, life-years (LYs), and costs were projected over a life-time horizon.
RESULTS: UK lifetime costs associated with CSAI amounts to £78,251.49 and generates 2.85 QALYs and 6.28 LYs (€104,500.08, 2.92 QALYs and 6.49 LYs for Germany). Costs associated with LCIG are £130,011.34, achieves 3.06 QALYs and 6.93 LYs (€175,004.43, 3.18 QALYs and 7.18 LYs for Germany). The incremental-cost per QALY gained (ICER) was £244,684.69 (€272,914.58). Costs for DBS are £87,730.22, associated with 2.75 QALYs and 6.38 LYs (€105,737.08, 2.85 QALYs and 6.61 LYs for Germany). CSAI dominates DBS. SOC associated UK costs are £76,793.49; 2.62 QALYs and 5.76 LYs were reached (€90,011.91, 2.73 QALYs and 6 LYs for Germany).
CONCLUSIONS: From a health economic perspective, CSAI is a cost-effective therapy and could be seen as an alternative treatment to LCIG or DBS for patients with advanced PD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced Parkinson disease; Apomorphine; Cost-utility-analysis; Germany; UK

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25348011     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2014.979937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  11 in total

Review 1.  Levodopa-carbidopa enteral suspension in advanced Parkinson's disease: clinical evidence and experience.

Authors:  Johan Virhammar; Dag Nyholm
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.570

2.  Epigallocatechin Gallate Has a Neurorescue Effect in a Mouse Model of Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Qi Xu; Monica Langley; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Manju B Reddy
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 3.  Economic Evaluation of Interventions in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Nafsika Afentou; Johan Jarl; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Sanjib Saha
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2019-04-11

Review 4.  Pharmacological Insights into the Use of Apomorphine in Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Manon Auffret; Sophie Drapier; Marc Vérin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Direct Cost of Parkinson's Disease: A Real-World Data Study of Second-Line Therapies.

Authors:  Elisa Gomez-Inhiesto; María Teresa Acaiturri-Ayesta; Iker Ustarroz-Aguirre; Diana Camahuali; Maider Urtaran-Laresgoiti; Marisol Basabe-Aldecoa; Roberto Nuño-Solinís; Elena Urizar
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020-05-12

6.  Apomorphine formulation may influence subcutaneous complications from continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Peter Hagell; Arja Höglund; Carina Hellqvist; Eva-Lena Johansson; Berit Löwed; Anne-Christine Sjöström; Carina Karlberg; Margareth Lundgren; Nil Dizdar; Anders Johansson; Thomas Willows; Johan Rådberg; Filip Bergquist
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Apomorphine Sublingual Film as an "On-Demand" Treatment for "OFF" Episodes in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Andrew Thach; Noam Kirson; Miriam L Zichlin; Ibrahima Dieye; Eric Pappert; G Rhys Williams
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-11-17

8.  Cost-Effectiveness of Device-Aided Therapies in Parkinson's Disease: A Structured Review.

Authors:  Katarzyna Smilowska; Daniel J van Wamelen; Tomasz Pietrzykowski; Alexander Calvano; Carmen Rodriguez-Blazquez; Pablo Martinez-Martin; Per Odin; K Ray Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  The potential price and access implications of the cost-utility and budget impact methodologies applied by NICE in England and ICER in the US for a novel gene therapy in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Jesper Jørgensen; Spiros Servos; Panos Kefalas
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 10.  The Choice Between Advanced Therapies for Parkinson's Disease Patients: Why, What, and When?

Authors:  Joke M Dijk; Alberto J Espay; Regina Katzenschlager; Rob M A de Bie
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.