Literature DB >> 25347848

Chemical footprint method for improved communication of freshwater ecotoxicity impacts in the context of ecological limits.

Anders Bjørn1, Miriam Diamond, Morten Birkved, Michael Zwicky Hauschild.   

Abstract

The ecological footprint method has been successful in communicating environmental impacts of anthropogenic activities in the context of ecological limits. We introduce a chemical footprint method that expresses ecotoxicity impacts from anthropogenic chemical emissions as the dilution needed to avoid freshwater ecosystem damage. The indicator is based on USEtox characterization factors with a modified toxicity reference point. Chemical footprint results can be compared to the actual dilution capacity within the geographic vicinity receiving the emissions to estimate whether its ecological limit has been exceeded and hence whether emissions can be expected to be environmentally sustainable. The footprint method was illustrated using two case studies. The first was all inventoried emissions from European countries and selected metropolitan areas in 2004, which indicated that the dilution capacity was likely exceeded for most European countries and all landlocked metropolitan areas. The second case study indicated that peak application of pesticides alone was likely to exceed Denmark's freshwater dilution capacity in 1999-2011. The uncertainty assessment showed that better spatially differentiated fate factors would be useful and pointed out other major sources of uncertainty and some opportunities to reduce these.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25347848     DOI: 10.1021/es503797d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Resource Footprints are Good Proxies of Environmental Damage.

Authors:  Zoran J N Steinmann; Aafke M Schipper; Mara Hauck; Stefan Giljum; Gregor Wernet; Mark A J Huijbregts
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  An expanded conceptual framework for solution-focused management of chemical pollution in European waters.

Authors:  John Munthe; Eva Brorström-Lundén; Magnus Rahmberg; Leo Posthuma; Rolf Altenburger; Werner Brack; Dirk Bunke; Guy Engelen; Bernd Manfred Gawlik; Jos van Gils; David López Herráez; Tomas Rydberg; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Annemarie van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 5.893

3.  Prospective mixture risk assessment and management prioritizations for river catchments with diverse land uses.

Authors:  Leo Posthuma; Colin D Brown; Dick de Zwart; Jerome Diamond; Scott D Dyer; Christopher M Holmes; Stuart Marshall; G Allen Burton
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Species sensitivity distributions for use in environmental protection, assessment, and management of aquatic ecosystems for 12 386 chemicals.

Authors:  Leo Posthuma; Jos van Gils; Michiel C Zijp; Dik van de Meent; Dick de Zwart
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 5.  Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities.

Authors:  Linn Persson; Bethanie M Carney Almroth; Christopher D Collins; Sarah Cornell; Cynthia A de Wit; Miriam L Diamond; Peter Fantke; Martin Hassellöv; Matthew MacLeod; Morten W Ryberg; Peter Søgaard Jørgensen; Patricia Villarrubia-Gómez; Zhanyun Wang; Michael Zwicky Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 6.  Toward Assessing Absolute Environmental Sustainability of Chemical Pollution.

Authors:  Marissa B Kosnik; Michael Zwicky Hauschild; Peter Fantke
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 11.357

7.  Towards a holistic and solution-oriented monitoring of chemical status of European water bodies: how to support the EU strategy for a non-toxic environment?

Authors:  Werner Brack; Beate I Escher; Erik Müller; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen; Tobias Schulze; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.893

8.  Advances, Norms, and Perspectives in Product Chemical Footprint Research.

Authors:  Yi Li; Yiman Cheng; Luyao Zhou; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.