Laura M Ensign1, Samuel K Lai, Ying-Ying Wang, Ming Yang, Olcay Mert, Justin Hanes, Richard Cone. 1. Center for Nanomedicine, ‡Department of Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Eye Institute, ⊥Department of Biomedical Engineering, and ○Departments of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Abstract
Mucosal drug delivery nanotechnologies are limited by the mucus barrier that protects nearly all epithelial surfaces not covered with skin. Most polymeric nanoparticles, including polystyrene nanoparticles (PS), strongly adhere to mucus, thereby limiting penetration and facilitating rapid clearance from the body. Here, we demonstrate that PS rapidly penetrate human cervicovaginal mucus (CVM), if the CVM has been pretreated with sufficient concentrations of Pluronic F127. Importantly, the diffusion rate of large polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated, nonmucoadhesive nanoparticles (PS-PEG) did not change in F127-pretreated CVM, implying that F127 did not significantly alter the native pore structure of CVM. Additionally, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) remains adherent in F127-pretreated CVM, indicating that the presence of F127 did not reduce adhesive interactions between CVM and the virions. In contrast to treatment with a surfactant that has been approved for vaginal use as a spermicide (nonoxynol-9 or N9), there was no increase in inflammatory cytokine release in the vaginal tract of mice after daily application of 1% F127 for 1 week. Pluronic F127 pretreatment holds potential as a method to safely improve the distribution, retention, and efficacy of nanoparticle formulations without compromising CVM barrier properties to pathogens.
Mucosal drug delivery nanotechnologies are limited by the mucus barrier that protects nearly all epithelial surfaces not covered with skin. Most polymeric nanoparticles, including polystyrene nanoparticles (PS), strongly adhere to mucus, thereby limiting penetration and facilitating rapid clearance from the body. Here, we demonstrate that PS rapidly penetrate human cervicovaginal mucus (CVM), if the CVM has been pretreated with sufficient concentrations of Pluronic F127. Importantly, the diffusion rate of large polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated, nonmucoadhesive nanoparticles (PS-PEG) did not change in F127-pretreated CVM, implying that F127 did not significantly alter the native pore structure of CVM. Additionally, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) remains adherent in F127-pretreated CVM, indicating that the presence of F127 did not reduce adhesive interactions between CVM and the virions. In contrast to treatment with a surfactant that has been approved for vaginal use as a spermicide (nonoxynol-9 or N9), there was no increase in inflammatory cytokine release in the vaginal tract of mice after daily application of 1% F127 for 1 week. Pluronic F127 pretreatment holds potential as a method to safely improve the distribution, retention, and efficacy of nanoparticle formulations without compromising CVM barrier properties to pathogens.
Mucus is a viscoelastic,
adhesive gel that coats and protects most
epithelial surfaces. Mucus barriers efficiently trap most foreign
particulates and pathogens through adhesive and steric interactions,
followed by rapid clearance.[1] Similarly,
conventional polymeric nanoparticles adhere avidly to mucus.[2−5] In contrast, we demonstrated that nanoparticles coated with a high
density of low-molecular weight polyethylene glycol (PEG) rapidly
penetrate human cervicovaginal mucus (CVM), as well as other types
of human and animal mucus.[2,3,6,7] So-called mucus-penetrating particles
provided improved vaginal distribution, retention, protection against
vaginal herpes infection, and safety in mice in vivo.[2] Similarly, mucus-penetrating gene carriers provided improved
airway distribution, retention, and gene expression in mice in vivo
without eliciting acute inflammatory responses.[8] Biodegradable mucus-penetrating nanoparticles composed
of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and a PluronicF127 coating provided improved cervical tumor suppression compared
to mucoadhesive PLGA nanoparticles when administered locally to the
vaginal mucosa.[9]A muco-inert PEG
coating has been achieved by covalent attachment
of PEG on the particle surface[3,10,11] or by physically adsorbing specific triblock copolymers of poly(propylene
oxide) (PPO) flanked by two PEG groups (PEG–PPO–PEG,
known as Pluronics) to the particle surface.[2,9,12] In the latter case, it was found that the
relatively hydrophobic PPO segment (if above a minimum molecular weight)
associated with the hydrophobic nanoparticle surface, while the PEG
chains extended outward to form a mucoinert surface coating.[12] Thus, we hypothesized that pretreating mucus
with Pluronic solution prior to nanoparticle addition may be another
method for imparting mucoinert surface properties to hydrophobic nanoparticles.
In this case, unmodified mucoadhesive nanoparticles could potentially
be delivered more efficiently to mucosal surfaces.Here, we
investigated the transport behavior of mucoadhesive polystyrene
nanoparticles (PS) in fresh, undiluted human CVM pretreated with various
concentrations of Pluronic F127 solution. We used large muco-inert,
PEG-coated PS nanoparticles (PS–PEG) to examine the potential
effects of F127 pretreatment on the native pore structure of CVM.
We then observed the transport behavior of herpes simplex virus (HSV-1)
in F127-pretreated CVM to ensure that the barrier properties were
not compromised. Finally, we characterized vaginal cytokine release
in mice to ensure that F127-pretreatment was not toxic to the vaginal
mucosal epithelium.
Materials and Methods
Nanoparticle
and Virus Preparation and Characterization
Fluorescent, carboxylate
(COOH)-modified polystyrene (PS-COOH) nanoparticles,
sized 200 and 500 nm, were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene,
OR). These particles have negative surface charge at neutral pH (Table S1). In order to produce nonmucoadhesive
nanoparticles (PS–PEG) for use in characterizing mucus pore
structure, PS-COOH particles were covalently modified with 2 kDa or
5 kDa amine-modified PEG (Creative PEGworks, Winston Salem, NC) as
previously described.[13] Particles were
added to CVM at a concentration of 0.2–0.4 mg/mL. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles were made as previously
described.[12] PLGA 2A (50:50) was purchased
from Lakeshore Biomaterials (Birmingham, AL), and Pluronic F127 was
purchased from BASF (Florham Park, NJ). Briefly, 10 mg/mL of PLGA
was dissolved in acetone and added dropwise to 40 mL of aqueous 1%
F127 solution. After stirring for 2 h, particles were filtered through
a 5 μm syringe filter and collected by centrifugation (Sorvall
RC-6+, ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA), and washed twice with 0.1%
F127 solution. PLGA nanoparticles were suspended in 1% F127 solution
at a particle concentration of 0.2 mg/mL.Particle size and
ζ-potential were determined by dynamic light scattering and
laser Doppler anemometry, respectively, using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90
(Malvern Instruments, Southborough, MA). Size measurements were performed
at 25 °C at a scattering angle of 90°. Samples were diluted
in 10 mM NaCl solution (pH 7) and measurements performed according
to instrument instructions. A near-neutral ζ-potential was used
to confirm PEG surface coating as previously described (Table S1).[10]HSV-1 virus was a generous gift from Prashant Desai (Johns Hopkins
University). The recombinant virus expresses red fluorescent protein
(RFP) internally,[14] so the fluorescent
label should not affect interactions between the viral surface and
mucus. The viral titer was 1.44E9 PFU/mL, and the virus was used at
this concentration.
Collection of Human CVM
CVM samples
were collected
as previously described.[15] Briefly, undiluted
cervicovaginal secretions from women with normal vaginal microbiota
were obtained using a self-sampling method following a protocol approved
by the Institutional Review Board of Johns Hopkins Medicine. The device
(Instead Softcup, Evofem, Inc., San Diego, CA) was inserted into the
vagina for ∼30 s, removed, and placed into a 50 mL conical
tube. Samples were centrifuged at 200g for 2 min
to collect the mucus secretions. None of the samples used in this
study were ovulatory by visual inspection for spinnbarkeit. The CVM
samples used in this study were from women with healthy microbiota,
indicated by sample pH < 4.5. Mucus samples were stored at 4 °C
prior to use (always within a few hours of collection).
CVM Sample
Preparation
F127 solution was added at specified
concentrations to ∼30 μL of CVM at a 3% (v/v) ratio in
custom-made chamber slides. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was added
to control CVM slides to account for possible dilution effects. The
slides were incubated at 37 °C in saturated humidity for 15 min
prior to nanoparticle addition (3% vol/vol). We found that 15 min
was sufficient incubation time; we observed no difference in nanoparticle
transport if the pretreated samples were incubated for up to 2 h prior
to nanoparticle addition (data not shown). After particle addition,
the slides were immediately sealed with super glue and imaged. CVM
samples were neutralized with minimal amounts (1–2 μL
per 100 μL of mucus) of 5 M sodium hydroxide for use in HSV-1
experiments. The initial and final pH of all samples was confirmed
by blotting a small mucus sample onto pH paper. Mucus samples were
gently mixed to minimize any perturbations to the mucus structure.
Multiple Particle Tracking in CVM
The trajectories
of fluorescent nanoparticles were recorded using a silicon-intensified
target camera (VE-1000, Dage-MTI, Michigan City, IN) mounted on an
inverted epifluorescence microscope equipped with 100× oil-immersion
objective (numerical aperture 1.3). Movies were captured with Metamorph
software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at a temporal resolution
of 66.7 ms for 20 s. Trajectories of n > 100 particles
were analyzed for each experiment, and at least three independent
experiments were performed using mucus samples from different women.
The coordinates of particle centroids were transformed into time-averaged
mean square displacements (MSD), calculated as <Δr2(τ) >= [x(t + τ) – x(t)]2 + [y(t + τ)
– y(t)]2, where
τ is time
scale (or time lag), x and y are
the corresponding particle coordinates at time t.
This equation was used to calculate particle MSDs as previously demonstrated.[3]Mucus samples were assumed to be locally
isotropic (but not homogeneous), such that 2D diffusion can be extrapolated
to 3D diffusion.[16] We have previously estimated
that the static error for our system is much smaller than the overall
particle displacements for PS–PEG, thus the static error is
not expected to have a significant impact on the quantification of
particle MSD.[17] Although we are unable
to determine the dynamic error for a complex fluid such as mucus,
we minimize contributions of dynamic error by comparing data at a
long time scale (1 s) relative to the time interval between frames.
In Vivo Cytokine Release
Female 6–8 week-old
CF-1 mice were purchased from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). Depo-Provera
(150 mg/mL) was purchased from Pharmacia and Upjohn Company (New York,
NY). Mice were given a subcutaneous flank injection of 2.5 mg Depo-Provera
in 100 μL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 7 days prior to
experiments. This treatment is commonly used to arrest and synchronize
the mouse in the diestrus phase of the estrous cycle.[18,19] A total of 20 μL of each test agent was administered intravaginally
once a day for 7 days. HEC gel and nonoxynol-9 (N9) were provided
by Thomas Moench (ReProtect). On the eighth day, each mouse was lavaged
twice with 50 μL of PBS. Cervicovaginal lavage fluid was diluted
with an additional 200 μL of PBS and centrifuged to remove the
mucus plug. The supernatant was removed and split into 50 μL
aliquots for each of the two (IL-1α, IL-1β) Quantikine
ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis,
MN). ELISAs were conducted per manufacturer instructions. All experimental
protocols were approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee.
Statistics
The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare
individual data sets, and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used
to compare multiple samples. These tests are the nonparametric version
of the t test and ANOVA test, respectively, which
is more appropriate in situations where data sets are not assumed
to fit a Gaussian distribution.[20]
Results
and Discussion
Transport of Polystyrene Nanoparticles in
F127-Pretreated CVM
We chose to test conventional mucoadhesive
polystyrene nanoparticles
(PS) 200 nm in size; 200 nm PS particles are highly adhesive to healthy
CVM, but diffuse rapidly in CVM when the hydrophobic core is densely
coated with low-molecular weight PEG (PS–PEG).[3] Currently, Pluronic concentrations in FDA-approved products
for topical use range from 0.01–15.5%, so we tested pretreatment
solutions with concentrations in this range. When CVM was pretreated
with 0.01% (w/v) F127, PS remained immobilized, similar to PS in untreated
CVM (Figure 1A). However, when CVM was pretreated
with 1% F127 solution, PS diffused at similar rates to PS–PEG
(Figure 1A). The ensemble-averaged mean square
displacement (⟨MSD⟩) of PS in CVM pretreated with 1%
F127 was significantly higher than the ⟨MSD⟩ of PS particles
in untreated CVM and 0.01% F127-pretreated CVM, and not statistically
different than the ⟨MSD⟩ of PS–PEG in CVM (Figure 1B). However, analysis of individual particle MSD
indicated that only ∼50% of PS in 1% F127-pretreated CVM were
highly diffusive, compared to nearly all PS–PEG (data not shown).
Since PS were not uniformly diffusive in 1% F127-pretreated CVM, we
investigated whether pretreating CVM with 5% and 10% (w/v) F127 solutions
would increase the percentage of diffusive PS. However, it was evident
that pretreatment of CVM with higher concentrations of F127 did not
lead to an increase in the fraction of rapidly diffusive PS particles.
Typical trajectories of diffusive PS and hindered PS in the same CVM
sample pretreated with 1% F127 are shown in Figure 2A. The distribution of individual particle MSDs in Figure 2B highlights the two distinct particle populations.
Based on these results, it is unclear whether the F127 was interacting
directly with the hydrophobic particle surface, hydrophobic portions
of CVM, or both. It is possible that some PS were able to adhere to
mucins or cell debris before the hydrophobic polymer core or hydrophobic
portions of the mucin proteins are completely shielded by F127. In
contrast, PS–PEG were nearly uniformly diffusive in CVM (Figure 2B), and mucoadhesive nanoparticles preincubated
in F127 solution were nearly uniformly diffusive in CVM.[12] Thus, it appears that direct modification of
the nanoparticle surface with F127 resulted in more uniform mucus-penetrating
character. Of note, some of the fastest PS in F127-pretreated CVM
had slightly higher MSD values than the fastest PS–PEG (Figure 2B), which could be due to the minor increase in
hydrodynamic diameter of PS–PEG after PEGylation (Table S1). As shown in Figure 2C, pretreatment of CVM with 5% and 10% F127 resulted in a
modest increase in the ⟨MSD⟩ of PS compared to pretreatment
of CVM with 1% F127, but all three treatment groups and PS–PEG
were statistically indistinguishable.
Figure 1
Transport of 200 nm particles in CVM pretreated
with low concentrations
of F127 (indicated by /% F127). (A) Trajectories of PS–PEG
and PS in CVM after pretreatment with varying concentrations of F127.
(B) Ensemble-averaged geometric mean square displacement (⟨MSD⟩)
as a function of time scale for PS–PEG and PS, including the
theoretical MSD in water (W). Data are means ± SEM (≥3
independent experiments, with n ≥ 100 particles
per experiment). *P < 0.05 compared to PS in untreated
mucus (PS), Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Figure 2
Transport of 200 nm particles in CVM pretreated with high concentrations
of F127 (indicated by /% F127). (A) Representative trajectories of
diffusive (left) and hindered (right) PS in CVM pretreated with 1%
F127. (B) Distributions of the logarithms of individual particle mean
square displacement (MSD) at a time scale of 1 s. (C) Ensemble-averaged
geometric MSD (⟨MSD⟩) as a function of time scale for
PS–PEG and PS, including the theoretical MSD in water (W).
Data are means ± SEM (≥3 independent experiments, with n ≥ 100 particles).
Transport of 200 nm particles in CVM pretreated
with low concentrations
of F127 (indicated by /% F127). (A) Trajectories of PS–PEG
and PS in CVM after pretreatment with varying concentrations of F127.
(B) Ensemble-averaged geometric mean square displacement (⟨MSD⟩)
as a function of time scale for PS–PEG and PS, including the
theoretical MSD in water (W). Data are means ± SEM (≥3
independent experiments, with n ≥ 100 particles
per experiment). *P < 0.05 compared to PS in untreated
mucus (PS), Wilcoxon rank sum test.Transport of 200 nm particles in CVM pretreated with high concentrations
of F127 (indicated by /% F127). (A) Representative trajectories of
diffusive (left) and hindered (right) PS in CVM pretreated with 1%
F127. (B) Distributions of the logarithms of individual particle mean
square displacement (MSD) at a time scale of 1 s. (C) Ensemble-averaged
geometric MSD (⟨MSD⟩) as a function of time scale for
PS–PEG and PS, including the theoretical MSD in water (W).
Data are means ± SEM (≥3 independent experiments, with n ≥ 100 particles).
Effect of F127 Pretreatment on CVM Pore Structure
We
next sought to determine whether pretreating CVM with F127 would affect
the structural properties of the mucus mesh. It was previously demonstrated
that the addition of polymers such as polyvinylpyridine and PEG to
ovulatory cervical mucus affected the mucus structure, which altered
cell migration rates through the mucus.[21,22] Similarly,
we described the use of nonadhesive PS–PEG as probes for characterizing
the microscopic structural and viscoelastic properties of mucus.[23,24] We demonstrated that pretreatment of CVM with a nonionic detergent,
N9, led to rearrangement of mucin bundles and an overall decrease
in pore size in CVM, without changing the macroscopic viscoelasticity.[23] Such a decrease in mesh spacing would reduce
the size of nanoparticle that could efficiently penetrate without
becoming sterically trapped.To determine whether the surfactant
properties of F127 would also affect the pore structure of CVM, we
used PS–PEG in the size range of the average pore size of CVM.[24] The transport behavior of 500 nm PS–PEG
is sensitive to small reductions in average mucus mesh pore size.[23] As shown in Figure 3A,
500 nm PS–PEG displayed similarly diffusive trajectories in
CVM, regardless of the concentration of F127 used to pretreat the
mucus (1–10%). The ⟨MSD⟩ of 500 nm PS–PEG
in untreated and F127-pretreated CVM were indistinguishable, indicating
that CVM pore structure was not affected by F127 pretreatment (Figure 3B). F127 is a triblock copolymer, so it does not
have the typical structure of a surfactant with a polar head and a
hydrophobic tail. In contrast, F127 structure alternates between hydrophilic,
hydrophobic, and hydrophilic regions. Thus, it would be less energetically
favorable for F127 to incorporate into mucin protein bundles and affect
the overall pore structure. Also, F127 is uncharged, so it would not
interact electrostatically with the highly negatively charged portions
of mucins.
Figure 3
Transport of 500 nm PS–PEG in CVM pretreated with high concentrations
of F127 (indicated by /% F127). (A) Trajectories of PS–PEG
in CVM after pretreatment with varying concentrations of F127. (B)
Ensemble-averaged geometric mean square displacement (⟨MSD⟩)
as a function of time scale for PS–PEG, including the theoretical
MSD in water (W). Data are means ± SEM (three independent experiments,
with n ≥ 100 particles per experiment).
Transport of 500 nm PS–PEG in CVM pretreated with high concentrations
of F127 (indicated by /% F127). (A) Trajectories of PS–PEG
in CVM after pretreatment with varying concentrations of F127. (B)
Ensemble-averaged geometric mean square displacement (⟨MSD⟩)
as a function of time scale for PS–PEG, including the theoretical
MSD in water (W). Data are means ± SEM (three independent experiments,
with n ≥ 100 particles per experiment).
Effect of F127 Pretreatment
on CVM as a Barrier to Herpes Simplex
Virus Type 1
The healthy human vagina is acidified to pH
3.5–4 by the presence of lactic acid secreting lactobacilli,[25,26] and we previously demonstrated that HSV-1 (diameter ∼ 180
nm) is adhesively, not sterically, trapped in healthy CVM.[24] However, vaginal pH is transiently neutralized
by the presence of semen.[27] Additionally,
bacterial vaginosis, a condition characterized by a lack of lactic
acid secreting bacteria and more neutral vaginal pH, is known to be
a risk factor for acquiring sexually transmitted infections.[28] Interestingly, recent work demonstrated that
HSV-1 diffuses rapidly through neutralized CVM.[29] Thus, the effect of pH on viral adhesion could potentially
explain the higher incidence of HSV infections in women with bacterial
vaginosis as compared to women with healthy vaginal microbiota. Since
the presence of F127 reduced adhesive interactions between CVM and
PS, we wanted to ensure that the presence of F127 in CVM would not
compromise the barrier properties of CVM to pathogens, such as HSV-1.Here, we compared the diffusion of HSV-1 in neutralized (pH ∼
7) CVM (Figure 4A) and F127-pretreated CVM.
In neutralized CVM, two populations of HSV-1 were observed and tracked:
a fraction that was immobilized and a fraction that diffused very
rapidly (some virions were not in focus long enough to track). Overall,
the ⟨MSD⟩ of all virions in the neutralized CVM sample
was only ∼15-fold reduced compared to similarly sized PS–PEG
at a time scale of 1 s (Figure 4B). In contrast,
HSV-1 remained adhesively immobilized in non-neutralized, healthy
CVM pretreated with 1–10% F127 solution, as indicated by the
lower, constant ⟨MSD⟩ over time (statistically indistinguishable
compared to HSV-1 in pH 4 CVM; Figure 4C).
Figure 4
Transport of HSV in neutralized CVM or CVM pretreated
with high
concentrations of F127 (indicated by /% F127). CVM samples are at
pH ∼ 4 unless otherwise noted. (A) Trajectories of HSV in untreated
CVM (HSVpH4), CVM after neutralization (HSVpH7), and CVM after pretreatment with varying concentrations of F127.
Ensemble-averaged geometric mean square displacement (⟨MSD⟩)
as a function of time scale for PS–PEG compared to (B) HSV
in neutralized (pH 7) and untreated (pH 4) CVM and (C) HSV in untreated
CVM (pH 4) or after pretreatment with varying concentrations of F127.
Data are means ± SEM (three independent experiments, with n ≥ 100 particles per experiment). *P < 0.05 compared to HSVpH4, Wilcoxon rank sum test.
The amount of visible virus under acidic conditions was reduced
compared to the amount of visible virus under neutralized conditions
(visual observation). In addition to the pH-dependent viral adhesion
to CVM, it has also been demonstrated that acidity reduces the infectivity
of HSV-1 by irreversibly disrupting the virus; the fraction of infectious
HSV-1 decreased as pH was reduced from 4.5 to 3.5.[30] However, all remaining visible HSV-1 was adhesively immobilized
in acidic CVM, regardless of F127 pretreatment. Thus, CVM acts as
both an adhesive and inactivating barrier to infection in the healthy
vagina, and the adhesive interactions with HSV-1 were not affected
by the presence of F127.Of note, we previously found that the
microstructure and bulk rheology
of CVM was remarkably resistant to pH changes in the range of pH 1–2
to pH 8–9.[31] PS–PEG 210 nm
in size rapidly diffused in both pH 4 and pH 6–7 CVM.[31] Thus, trapping of HSV-1 (∼180 nm) in
acidic CVM must be due to adhesive interactions that are reduced at
neutral pH. It is possible that HSV-1 envelope proteins play a role
in its adhesion to CVM, and that pH changes induce charge and conformational
changes in surface proteins. Similarly, we previously found that HIV
was adhesively trapped in healthy CVM, but diffused rapidly in neutralized
CVM.[32] When HIV was incubated in lactic
acid at pH 4, mimicking healthy CVM, the surface charge was near 0.
In contrast, at pH 7, the virion surface charge was highly negative.[32] If the interactions of HSV-1 with CVM are similarly
based on surface proteins and surface charge, then it is unlikely
that the shielding of hydrophobic interactions by F127 would have
an impact on HSV-2 adhesion.Transport of HSV in neutralized CVM or CVM pretreated
with high
concentrations of F127 (indicated by /% F127). CVM samples are at
pH ∼ 4 unless otherwise noted. (A) Trajectories of HSV in untreated
CVM (HSVpH4), CVM after neutralization (HSVpH7), and CVM after pretreatment with varying concentrations of F127.
Ensemble-averaged geometric mean square displacement (⟨MSD⟩)
as a function of time scale for PS–PEG compared to (B) HSV
in neutralized (pH 7) and untreated (pH 4) CVM and (C) HSV in untreated
CVM (pH 4) or after pretreatment with varying concentrations of F127.
Data are means ± SEM (three independent experiments, with n ≥ 100 particles per experiment). *P < 0.05 compared to HSVpH4, Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Safety of Vaginal F127
Administration In Vivo
When
proposing to use a surfactant solution as a pretreatment for a mucosal
surface, it is important to ensure that the solution does not cause
local toxicity or inflammation. The epithelium itself serves as a
barrier to pathogens at mucosal surfaces; damage to the epithelium
and local inflammation can increase risk of viral transmission, potentially
diminishing the therapeutic effects of a delivered drug.[33,34] The surfactant N9 was shown to cause local toxicity in the vagina
that led to an increase in HIV transmission.[35] In this case, N9 caused local epithelial irritation and toxicity,
diminishing the barrier properties of the epithelium. We have previously
demonstrated that a single dose of 2% N9 significantly increases susceptibility
to HSV-2 in a mouse model.[36] Furthermore,
repeated vaginal administration of N9 in mice caused an increase in
inflammatory cytokines IL-1α and IL-1β (but not TNF-α
or IL-6), whereas repeated vaginal administration of hydroxyethylcellulose
(HEC) placebo gel was indistinguishable from no treatment.[2] IL-1α/β are secreted by the epithelium
in response to injury.[37] Here, we show
that daily vaginal administration of 1% F127 solution for one week
did not elevate IL-1α/β compared to controls (Figure 5). Additionally, cytokine levels were not elevated
in response to daily administration of PLGA nanoparticles in a 1%
F127 solution (PLGA/1% F127). In contrast, treatment with 5% N9 solution
caused a significant increase in both IL-1α and IL-1β
levels, indicating epithelial injury that leads to diminished barrier
properties.
Figure 5
IL-1α and IL-1β concentrations in mouse vaginal lavage
fluid after daily vaginal treatments for 1 week. Data are means ±
SEM; *P < 0.05 compared to no treatment, Wilcoxon
rank sum test. N9 and HEC data reprinted with permission from ref (5). Copyright 2012 AAAS.
IL-1α and IL-1β concentrations in mouse vaginal lavage
fluid after daily vaginal treatments for 1 week. Data are means ±
SEM; *P < 0.05 compared to no treatment, Wilcoxon
rank sum test. N9 and HEC data reprinted with permission from ref (5). Copyright 2012 AAAS.F127 has a long history of safety, and many products considered
safe for ingestion and for application to the eye and buccal mucosa
contain Pluronics,[38,39] including drug delivery devices.[40,41] Indeed, previous studies with particles formulated for oral delivery
have employed 1% F127 as a suspending solution,[42,43] which may have reduced mucoadhesion and increased overall effectiveness
of the particles. In contrast to vaginal F127 treatment, vaginal N9
treatment resulted in a significant increase in both IL-1α and
IL-1β2. Similar to treatment with F127 alone, there
was no increase in IL-1α and IL-1β release for F127-coated
PLGA nanoparticles.F127-coated PLGA nanoparticles have already
been demonstrated to
rapidly penetrate CVM,[12] distribute over
the entire vaginal and ectocervical surfaces,[2] and provide enhanced cervical tumor suppression.[9] Similar mucus-penetrating characteristics were already
demonstrated for F127-coated polycaprolactone (PCL).[12] In contrast, PLGA particles first coated in a relatively
hydrophilic surfactant, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), were found to be
mucoadhesive, and could not be further coated by Pluronic F127 to
reduce mucoadhesion.[5] Improvements in mucosal
delivery would be expected for Pluronic pretreatment in combination
with other hydrophobic nanoparticle formulations compared to the nanoparticles
alone, which will have to be determined on a case-by-case basis. Combining
a mucosal pretreatment, such as a solution in the vagina or an aerosol
for inhalation into the lungs, with a mucoadhesive nanoparticle formulation
may eliminate the need for any changes in manufacturing and reduce
time and costs for clinical development. However, of note, more uniform
diffusive character was observed for nanoparticles that were formulated
either with dense PEG coatings (Figure 1) or
preincubated in Pluronic F127 to form a surface coating prior to addition
to mucus.[12] For particles preincubated
in Pluronic F127 solution and administered to mucosal surfaces, the
results here suggest that excess Pluronic in solution will not negatively
impact the microstructure or barrier properties of mucus to pathogens.
Conclusions
We found that pretreating human CVM with a sufficient
concentration
of Pluronic F127 led to a significant enhancement in the diffusion
of ∼50% of conventional mucoadhesive polystyrene nanoparticles
(PS). It remains to be determined whether this simple technique may
be generally used with hydrophobic nanoparticle formulations to improve
delivery to mucosal surfaces compared to hydrophobic nanoparticles
alone. Pluronic F127 did not affect the native mucus pore structure
or cause an inflammatory response after daily vaginal administration
for one week. Although HSV-1 rapidly diffuses through neutralized
CVM, F127-pretreatment did not reduce adhesion between HSV-1 and healthy,
acidic CVM. Therefore, Pluronic pretreatment of mucosal tissues may
improve the effectiveness of conventional drug delivery nanotechnologies
in a safe manner.
Authors: Emily A Krogstad; Renuka Ramanathan; Christina Nhan; John C Kraft; Anna K Blakney; Shijie Cao; Rodney J Y Ho; Kim A Woodrow Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Benjamin S Schuster; Laura M Ensign; Daniel B Allan; Jung Soo Suk; Justin Hanes Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 15.470