S H Kim1, S Y Jung1, M G Kim2, J Y Byun1, M S Park1, S G Yeo1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the recovery rates of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) treated with oral systemic steroids (PO) or intratympanic steroid injection (IT) or both. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed with ISSHL within 14 days of the onset of symptoms. The patients were divided into three groups by treatment modality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Threshold of pure-tone tests, age, accompanying symptoms and underlying diseases were compared. The level of final hearing recovery was evaluated by the application of the results of the pure-tone test that was performed at least 3 months after the completion of each treatment. RESULTS: Final hearing recovery rate differed significantly by the type of treatment (P = 0.031). Recovery rates in the PO and combined groups were significantly higher in patients with mild (85.1% and 88.6%, respectively) than with profound (52.8% and 69.0%, respectively) hearing loss (P < 0.05). In contrast, severity and recovery rate were not significantly correlated in the IT group (P > 0.05). Combined treatment yielded significantly higher recovery rates than other treatment modalities in patients without hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: In the group treated with combined therapy, better hearing improvement was obtained than in the groups treated with systemic steroid only or with intratympanic steroid injection only without complications. These findings suggest that the combination of systemic administration and intratympanic injection may improve patient prognosis.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the recovery rates of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) treated with oral systemic steroids (PO) or intratympanic steroid injection (IT) or both. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed with ISSHL within 14 days of the onset of symptoms. The patients were divided into three groups by treatment modality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Threshold of pure-tone tests, age, accompanying symptoms and underlying diseases were compared. The level of final hearing recovery was evaluated by the application of the results of the pure-tone test that was performed at least 3 months after the completion of each treatment. RESULTS: Final hearing recovery rate differed significantly by the type of treatment (P = 0.031). Recovery rates in the PO and combined groups were significantly higher in patients with mild (85.1% and 88.6%, respectively) than with profound (52.8% and 69.0%, respectively) hearing loss (P < 0.05). In contrast, severity and recovery rate were not significantly correlated in the IT group (P > 0.05). Combined treatment yielded significantly higher recovery rates than other treatment modalities in patients without hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: In the group treated with combined therapy, better hearing improvement was obtained than in the groups treated with systemic steroid only or with intratympanic steroid injection only without complications. These findings suggest that the combination of systemic administration and intratympanic injection may improve patient prognosis.