Arne Liebau1, Olivia Pogorzelski1, Alec N Salt2, Stefan K Plontke1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The use of glucocorticoids for secondary (salvage/rescue) therapy of idiopathic sudden hearing loss (ISSHL), including controlled and uncontrolled studies with intratympanic injections or continuous, catheter mediated applications, were evaluated by means of a meta-analysis in an attempt to define optimal local drug delivery protocols for ISSHL. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 30 studies with 33 treatment groups between January 2000 and June 2014 were selected based on sufficiently detailed description of application protocols. Cochlear drug levels were calculated by a validated computer model of drug dispersion in the inner ear fluids based on the concentration and volume of glucocorticoids applied, the time drug remained in the middle ear, and on the specific timing of injections. Various factors were compared with hearing outcome, including baseline data, individual parameters of the application protocols, calculated peak concentration (Cmax), and total dose (area under the curve, AUC). RESULTS: There was no dependence of hearing outcome on individual parameters of the application protocol, Cmax or AUC. Hearing gain and final hearing thresholds were independent of treatment delay. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data from uncontrolled and controlled randomized and non-randomized studies no clear recommendation can be made so far for a specific application protocol for either primary or secondary (salvage) intratympanic steroid treatment in patients with ISSHL. For meta-analyses, change in pure tone average (PTA) may not be an adequate outcome parameter to assess effectiveness of the intervention especially with inhomogeneity of patient populations. Final PTA might provide a better outcome parameter.
OBJECTIVE: The use of glucocorticoids for secondary (salvage/rescue) therapy of idiopathic sudden hearing loss (ISSHL), including controlled and uncontrolled studies with intratympanic injections or continuous, catheter mediated applications, were evaluated by means of a meta-analysis in an attempt to define optimal local drug delivery protocols for ISSHL. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 30 studies with 33 treatment groups between January 2000 and June 2014 were selected based on sufficiently detailed description of application protocols. Cochlear drug levels were calculated by a validated computer model of drug dispersion in the inner ear fluids based on the concentration and volume of glucocorticoids applied, the time drug remained in the middle ear, and on the specific timing of injections. Various factors were compared with hearing outcome, including baseline data, individual parameters of the application protocols, calculated peak concentration (Cmax), and total dose (area under the curve, AUC). RESULTS: There was no dependence of hearing outcome on individual parameters of the application protocol, Cmax or AUC. Hearing gain and final hearing thresholds were independent of treatment delay. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data from uncontrolled and controlled randomized and non-randomized studies no clear recommendation can be made so far for a specific application protocol for either primary or secondary (salvage) intratympanic steroid treatment in patients with ISSHL. For meta-analyses, change in pure tone average (PTA) may not be an adequate outcome parameter to assess effectiveness of the intervention especially with inhomogeneity of patient populations. Final PTA might provide a better outcome parameter.
Authors: William H Slattery; Laurel M Fisher; Zarina Iqbal; Rick A Friedman; Nancy Liu Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Markus Suckfuell; Grazyna Lisowska; Wojciech Domka; Anna Kabacinska; Krzysztof Morawski; Robert Bodlaj; Petr Klimak; Rom Kostrica; Thomas Meyer Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Stefan K Plontke; Christoph Meisner; Sumit Agrawal; Per Cayé-Thomasen; Kevin Galbraith; Anthony A Mikulec; Lorne Parnes; Yaamini Premakumar; Julia Reiber; Anne Gm Schilder; Arne Liebau Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-07-22
Authors: Stefan K Plontke; Arne Liebau; Eric Lehner; Daniel Bethmann; Karsten Mäder; Torsten Rahne Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 5.152