Literature DB >> 25346054

Are there sex differences in placebo analgesia during visceral pain processing? A fMRI study in healthy subjects.

N Theysohn1, J Schmid, A Icenhour, C Mewes, M Forsting, E R Gizewski, M Schedlowski, S Elsenbruch, S Benson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We explored sex differences in the neural mechanisms mediating placebo analgesia in an established visceral pain model involving painful rectal distensions in healthy volunteers.
METHODS: N = 15 men and N = 15 women underwent three consecutive functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions during which cued painful rectal distensions were delivered. After an adaptation session, positive expectations were induced with deceptive instructions regarding administration of an analgesic drug (placebo session). In the other session (control), truthful information about an inert substance was given. Sex differences in placebo-induced modulation of neural activation during anticipation and pain were analyzed along with ratings of expected and perceived pain intensity. KEY
RESULTS: Placebo-induced reductions in pain ratings were comparable between men and women. At the level of the brain, group comparisons with respect to differences between the placebo and control conditions revealed greater modulation of the posterior insula (regions-of-interest analysis: pFWE < 0.05) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (whole-brain analysis: p < 0.001, uncorrected) during pain anticipation in women. During pain, placebo-induced down-regulation of the insula was altered in women compared to men (ROI analysis: pFWE < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Our data provide first evidence supporting sex differences in pain-induced neural modulation during visceral placebo analgesia despite similar placebo-induced reductions in perceived pain intensity. These preliminary findings might contribute to elucidating mechanisms mediating placebo effects in clinical conditions associated with chronic abdominal pain such as in irritable bowel syndrome.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expectation; fMRI; placebo analgesia; sex differences; visceral pain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25346054     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  7 in total

1.  Placebo Effects on the Neurologic Pain Signature: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Matthias Zunhammer; Ulrike Bingel; Tor D Wager
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 18.302

2.  Meta-analysis of neural systems underlying placebo analgesia from individual participant fMRI data.

Authors:  Matthias Zunhammer; Tamás Spisák; Tor D Wager; Ulrike Bingel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  OPRM1 rs1799971, COMT rs4680, and FAAH rs324420 genes interact with placebo procedures to induce hypoalgesia.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Yang Wang; Pedro E Martinez; Yen-Pei C Chang; Kathleen A Ryan; Colin Hodgkinson; David Goldman; Susan G Dorsey
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 4.  A systematic review of sex differences in the placebo and the nocebo effect.

Authors:  Sara M Vambheim; Magne Arve Flaten
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Sex Differences in the Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Signal to Placebo Analgesia and Nocebo Hyperalgesia in Experimental Pain: A Functional MRI Study.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Hongrui Zhan; Yanyan Zeng; Shimin Huang; Guiyuan Cai; Jianming Yang; Wen Wu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Central correlates of placebo effects in nausea differ between men and women.

Authors:  Anja Haile; Mallissa Watts; Simone Aichner; Franziska Stahlberg; Verena Hoffmann; Matthias H Tschoep; Karin Meissner
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Designing and conducting proof-of-concept chronic pain analgesic clinical trials.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Ian Gilron; Tina Doshi; Srinivasa Raja
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-02-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.