Literature DB >> 25343019

Masking Release for Igbo and English.

Deborah U Ebem1, Joseph G Desloge2, Charlotte M Reed2, Louis D Braida2, Joy O Uguru3.   

Abstract

In this research, we explored the effect of noise interruption rate on speech intelligibility. Specifically, we used the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) procedure with the original HINT stimuli (English) and Igbo stimuli to assess speech reception ability in interrupted noise. For a given noise level, the HINT test provides an estimate of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required for 50%-correct speech intelligibility. The SNR for 50%-correct intelligibility changes depending upon the interruption rate of the noise. This phenomenon (called Masking Release) has been studied extensively in English but not for Igbo - which is an African tonal language spoken predominantly in South Eastern Nigeria. This experiment explored and compared the phenomenon of Masking Release for (i) native English speakers listening to English, (ii) native Igbo speakers listening to English, and (iii) native Igbo speakers listening to Igbo. Since Igbo is a tonal language and English is a non-tonal language, this allowed us to compare Masking Release patterns on native speakers of tonal and non-tonal languages. Our results for native English speakers listening to English HINT show that the SNR and the masking release are orderly and consistent with other English HINT data for English speakers. Our result for Igbo speakers listening to English HINT sentences show that there is greater variability in results across the different Igbo listeners than across the English listeners. This result likely reflects different levels of ability in the English language across the Igbo listeners. The masking release values in dB are less than for English listeners. Our results for Igbo speakers listening to Igbo show that in general, the SNRs for Igbo sentences are lower than for English/English and Igbo/English. This means that the Igbo listeners could understand 50% of the Igbo sentences at SNRs less than those required for English sentences by either native or non-native listeners. This result can be explained by the fact that the perception of Igbo utterances by Igbo subjects may have been aided by the prediction of tonal and vowel harmony features existent in the Igbo language. In agreement with other studies, our results also show that in a noisy environment listeners are able to perceive their native language better than a second language. The ability of native language speakers to perceive their language better than a second language in a noisy environment may be attributed to the fact that: Native speakers are more familiar with the sounds of their language than second language speakers.One of the features of language is that it is predictable hence even in noise a native speaker may be able to predict a succeeding word that is scarcely audible. These contextual effects are facilitated by familiarity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hearing in noise test; interruption rate; intilligibility; masking release

Year:  2013        PMID: 25343019      PMCID: PMC4204631     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr J Comput Ict        ISSN: 2006-1781


  11 in total

1.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT).

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Sigfrid D Soli; Sha Liu; Na Han; Ming-Wei Huang
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.

Authors:  S P Bacon; J M Opie; D Y Montoya
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Language-specific listening.

Authors:  C Pallier; A Christophe; J Mehler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners.

Authors:  A Stuart; D P Phillips
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  M Nilsson; S D Soli; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.

Authors:  Van Summers; Michelle R Molis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; D D Dirks; T S Bell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.