Literature DB >> 8979036

Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners.

A Stuart1, D P Phillips.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broadband noise was examined in young normal-hearing (YNH), older normal-hearing (ONH), and presbyacusic (older hearing-impaired [OHI]) listeners.
DESIGN: Participants (N = 36) were presented with identical Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 stimuli at 30 dB sensation level re their respective speech reception thresholds. The speech stimuli were presented in quiet and in both competing noise conditions with signal to noise ratios (S/Ns) of 10, 5, 0, -5, -10, -15, and -20 dB.
RESULTS: In general performance was superior in quiet, improved with increasing S/N, and was greater in the interrupted broadband noise than in the continuous broadband noise. Significant main effects of group and S/N were found in both competing noises (p < 0.0001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed all groups performed differently, with superior performance being displayed by the YNH group followed by the ONH and OHI groups, respectively (p < 0.05). A significant group by S/N interaction was observed in only the interrupted noise condition (p = 0.019). The degree of change in word recognition performance as a function of S/N was greatest in the OHI group followed by the ONH group and the YNH group.
CONCLUSIONS: Group effects observed in the interrupted noise would imply that the two older groups of listeners had an auditory temporal deficit relative to the YNH listeners. The paradigm reveals the patency of the temporal processes that are responsible for the perceptual advantage (i.e., a release from masking) a listener has in interrupted competing stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8979036     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199612000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  38 in total

1.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Cortical encoding of signals in noise: effects of stimulus type and recording paradigm.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Keri O Bennett; Michelle R Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  An examination of speech recognition in a modulated background and of forward masking in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon; Erica J Williams
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

8.  Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lisa N Whittle; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  The benefits of hearing aids and closed captioning for television viewing by older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Julia S Callahan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.