Literature DB >> 25342315

Clinical and genetic factors related to cancer-induced bone pain and bone pain relief.

Emanuela Scarpi1, Daniele Calistri1, Pål Klepstad1, Stein Kaasa1, Frank Skorpen1, Ragnhild Habberstad1, Oriana Nanni1, Dino Amadori1, Marco Maltoni2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to evaluate whether there are clinical or genetic differences between patients with cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) and patients with non-CIBP, and, in the CIBP group, in those with good versus poor opioid response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,294 adult patients with cancer who were receiving opioids for moderate or severe pain were included in the European Pharmacogenetic Opioid Study. Pain intensity and pain relief were measured using the Brief Pain Inventory. Linkage disequilibrium of 112 single nucleotide polymorphisms was evaluated in 25 candidate genes, and 43 haplotypes were assessed. Correlations among demographical factors, disease-related factors, genetic factors, CIBP, and pain relief were analyzed by logistic regression models corrected for multiple testing. Patients with bone metastases and bone/soft tissue pain were defined as having prevalent bone pain (CIBP population). This population was compared with patients who had other types of cancer pain (non-CIBP).
RESULTS: A total of 577 patients (26.2%) had CIBP, and 1,624 patients (73.8%) had non-CIBP. Patients with CIBP had more breakthrough cancer pain episodes (64.2% vs. 56.4%, p = .001), had significantly higher pain interference in "walking ability in the past 24 hours" (p < .0001), used more adjuvant drugs (84.1% vs. 78.3%, p = .003), and had a higher, albeit nonsignificant, median overall survival (3.8 vs. 2.9 months, p = .716) than patients with non-CIBP. None of the examined haplotypes exceeded p values corrected for multiple testing for the investigated outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Patients with CIBP who were taking opioids had a clinical profile slightly different from that of the non-CIBP group. However, no specific genetic pattern emerged for CIBP versus non-CIBP or for responsive versus nonresponsive patients with CIBP. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Cancer-induced bone pain; Genetic factors; Haplotypes; Opioids; Palliative care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25342315      PMCID: PMC4257743          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  40 in total

Review 1.  Opioid genetics: the key to personalized pain control?

Authors:  R Branford; J Droney; J R Ross
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  MENDELIAN PROPORTIONS IN A MIXED POPULATION.

Authors:  G H Hardy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1908-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Medical management of metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Naveen S Vasudev; Janet E Brown
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.302

Review 4.  Pain, analgesia and genetics.

Authors:  Arjun Muralidharan; Maree T Smith
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.765

5.  Limits of the 'Mini-Mental State' as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients.

Authors:  J C Anthony; L LeResche; U Niaz; M R von Korff; M F Folstein
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Breakthrough pain: definition, prevalence and characteristics.

Authors:  Russell K Portenoy; Neil A Hagen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  Pharmacogenetics in palliative care.

Authors:  Maren Kleine-Brueggeney; Frank Musshoff; Frank Stuber; Ulrike M Stamer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years.

Authors:  M H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen; J M de Rijke; A G Kessels; H C Schouten; M van Kleef; J Patijn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  R L Daut; C S Cleeland; R C Flanery
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Analgesic efficacy of peripheral kappa-opioid receptor agonist CR665 compared to oxycodone in a multi-modal, multi-tissue experimental human pain model: selective effect on visceral pain.

Authors:  Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Anne E Olesen; Camilla Staahl; Frédérique Menzaghi; Sherron Kell; Gilbert Y Wong; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  4 in total

1.  Which factors can aid clinicians to identify a risk of pain during the following month in patients with bone metastases? A longitudinal analyses.

Authors:  Ragnhild Habberstad; M J Hjermstad; C Brunelli; S Kaasa; M I Bennett; K Pardon; P Klepstad
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Assessing the impact of pain on the life of breast cancer survivors using the Brief Pain Inventory.

Authors:  Vânia Tie Koga Ferreira; Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho; Alessandra Kelly de Oliveira; Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes; Elizabete Santos Melo; Ana Maria de Almeida
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26

3.  Sensitization of Cutaneous Primary Afferents in Bone Cancer Revealed by In Vivo Calcium Imaging.

Authors:  Larissa de Clauser; Ana P Luiz; Sonia Santana-Varela; John N Wood; Shafaq Sikandar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Genetic and Clinical Factors Associated with Opioid Response in Chinese Han Patients with Cancer Pain: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Chen Shi; Jinmei Liu; Jianli Hu; Xu Chen; Jiyi Xie; Juan Luo; Cong Wang; Hanxiang Wang; Qi Yuan; Haixia Zhu; Weijing Gong; Shijun Li; Hong Zhou; Leiyun Wang; Hui Wang; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-02-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.