Betty J Gaffney1. 1. Department of Biological Science, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, United States.
Abstract
CONSPECTUS: Lipoxygenase enzymes insert oxygen in a polyunsaturated lipid, yielding a hydroperoxide product. When the acyl chain is arachidonate, with three cis-pentadiene units, 12 positionally and stereochemically different products might result. The plant lipids, linoleate and linolenate, have, respectively, four and eight potential oxygen insertion sites. The puzzle of how specificity is achieved in these reactions grows as more and more protein structures confirm the conservation of a lipoxygenase protein fold in plants, animals, and bacteria. Lipoxygenases are large enough (60-100 kDa) that they provide a protein shell completely surrounding an active site cavity that has the shape of a long acyl chain and contains a catalytic metal (usually iron). This Account summarizes electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic, and other, experiments designed to bridge the gap between lipid-lipoxygenase interactions in solution and crystal structures. Experiments with spin-labeled lipids give a picture of bound lipids tethered to protein by an acyl chain, but with a polar end emerging from the cavity to solvent exposure, where the headgroup is highly flexible. The location of a spin on the polar end of a lysolecithin was determined by pulsed, dipolar EPR measurements, by representing the protein structure as a five-point grid of spin-labels with coordinates derived from 10 distance determinations between spin pairs. Distances from the lipid spin to each grid site completed a six-point representation of the enzyme with a bound lipid. Insight into the dynamics that allow substrate/product to enter/exit the cavity was obtained with a different set of spin-labeled protein mutants. Once substrate enters the cavity, the rate-limiting step of catalysis involves redox cycling at the metal center. Here, a mononuclear iron cycles between ferric and ferrous (high-spin) forms. Two helices provide pairs of side-chain ligands to the iron, resulting in characteristic EPR signals. Quantitative comparison of EPR spectra of plant and bacterial lipoxygenases has suggested conservation of a unique geometry of lipoxygenase iron centers. High frequency (94 GHz) EPR is consistent with a similar metal center in a manganese version of lipoxygenase. Overall, established and emerging EPR experiments have been developed and applied to the lipoxygenase family of enzymes to elucidate changes in the solution structures that are related to function.
CONSPECTUS: Lipoxygenase enzymes insert oxygen in a polyunsaturated lipid, yielding a hydroperoxide product. When the acyl chain is arachidonate, with three cis-pentadiene units, 12 positionally and stereochemically different products might result. The plant lipids, linoleate and linolenate, have, respectively, four and eight potential oxygen insertion sites. The puzzle of how specificity is achieved in these reactions grows as more and more protein structures confirm the conservation of a lipoxygenase protein fold in plants, animals, and bacteria. Lipoxygenases are large enough (60-100 kDa) that they provide a protein shell completely surrounding an active site cavity that has the shape of a long acyl chain and contains a catalytic metal (usually iron). This Account summarizes electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic, and other, experiments designed to bridge the gap between lipid-lipoxygenase interactions in solution and crystal structures. Experiments with spin-labeled lipids give a picture of bound lipids tethered to protein by an acyl chain, but with a polar end emerging from the cavity to solvent exposure, where the headgroup is highly flexible. The location of a spin on the polar end of a lysolecithin was determined by pulsed, dipolar EPR measurements, by representing the protein structure as a five-point grid of spin-labels with coordinates derived from 10 distance determinations between spin pairs. Distances from the lipid spin to each grid site completed a six-point representation of the enzyme with a bound lipid. Insight into the dynamics that allow substrate/product to enter/exit the cavity was obtained with a different set of spin-labeled protein mutants. Once substrate enters the cavity, the rate-limiting step of catalysis involves redox cycling at the metal center. Here, a mononuclear iron cycles between ferric and ferrous (high-spin) forms. Two helices provide pairs of side-chain ligands to the iron, resulting in characteristic EPR signals. Quantitative comparison of EPR spectra of plant and bacterial lipoxygenases has suggested conservation of a unique geometry of lipoxygenaseiron centers. High frequency (94 GHz) EPR is consistent with a similar metal center in a manganese version of lipoxygenase. Overall, established and emerging EPR experiments have been developed and applied to the lipoxygenase family of enzymes to elucidate changes in the solution structures that are related to function.
The
best-characterized group of lipoxygenases is the isoform set
in soybeans. There are crystal structures of four of these.[1−4] Overall, the enzymes have two domains, the larger of which is the
lipoxygenase fold. This domain is mostly helical, composed of ∼20
helices and several sheets, in plant, animal and bacterial lipoxygenases
(Conspectus figure). The structures of the soybean set enclose a cavity
that wraps around the water (hydroxyl) ligand of a redox-active iron.
In the apoenzyme, the cavity contains several well-ordered solvent
molecules. Side chains of seven conserved residues line the substrate
cavity in the structures of the soybean isoforms, and these are largely
nonpolar (Figure 1, gray side chains).[4] The cavity has two lobes; several configurations
of linoleic acid can be modeled into the lobe containing catalytic
iron[5] (Figure 1,
magenta carbon chain). The other lobe contains an arginine of debated
function. Four residues with side chains that coordinate nonheme iron
are at equivalent sequence positions in known lipoxygenase structures:
three histidines and a carboxyl, provided by the C-terminus, an unusual
ligand to a protein-bound metal; a fifth side chain coordinating iron
is most often asparagine (Figure 1, cyan carbons),
but in some cases it is another histidine. Water (or hydroxide) is
a sixth metal ligand.
Figure 1
Representations of conserved residues lining the substrate
cavity
in four isoforms of soybean lipoxygenase (gray, bold letters are residue
numbers of SBL1 and smaller numbers refer to residue positions in
soybean lipoxygenase isoforms LOX-3, VLXB, and VLXD.) Protein side
chain ligands to iron (carbon in cyan) are shown, together with a
linoleic acid models (purple). A conserved Arg (gray) occurs in a
subcavity extension. Catalytic iron is colored salmon and the water
O ligand, dark gray. Adapted with permission from Figure 5A, ref (4), 2006 John Wiley &
Sons.
Representations of conserved residues lining the substrate
cavity
in four isoforms of soybeanlipoxygenase (gray, bold letters are residue
numbers of SBL1 and smaller numbers refer to residue positions in
soybeanlipoxygenase isoforms LOX-3, VLXB, and VLXD.) Protein side
chain ligands to iron (carbon in cyan) are shown, together with a
linoleic acid models (purple). A conserved Arg (gray) occurs in a
subcavity extension. Catalytic iron is colored salmon and the water
O ligand, dark gray. Adapted with permission from Figure 5A, ref (4), 2006 John Wiley &
Sons.One arrangement of linoleic acid
in the soybean cavity[5] is presented in
Figure 1, but models having the polar and methyl
ends in reversed orientation
can be made also. The reverse placement idea[5] has guided experiments on lipoxygenases for many years, especially
because the product of the enzymatic reaction with linoleic acid would
be the 13S hydroperoxide for the orientation shown
in Figure 1, but it would be 9S if the substrate orientation were reversed (Figure 2). Lipid substrates for lipoxygenase contain at least one cis,cis-1,4-pentadiene unit. Linoleate
has one of these units, and arachidonate has three (Figure 2). The rate-limiting step of the enzymatic reaction
is a proton-coupled electron transfer involving a bis-allylic C–H
bond of substrate and the catalytic iron.[6] A proton transfers to the −OH ligand of metal and an electron
reduces ferric iron. Hydrogen removal and oxygen insertion, (n ± 2) carbons away, are usually antarafacial (Figure 2). A case of suprafacial oxygenation has been found
more recently in a natural lipoxygenase.[7] One electron transfers to/from the metal center in the catalytic
cycle are illustrated in the bottom line of Figure 2. The ferrous and ferric ions are high spin (four and five
unpaired electrons, respectively) in lipoxygenases. With this background
in mind, experiments were designed to ask: where is the polar end
of a lipid when it is bound to lipoxygenase, and how does it get there?
Do the spectra of the metal center account for all of the metal in
the “EPR-visible” states, and is there a unique spectral
signature for lipoxygenases from different species?
Figure 2
Substrates (linoleate
and arachidonate) and product hydroperoxide
(HPODE) of the lipoxygenase catalytic reaction and one-electron redox
reactions at the iron atom are depicted.
Substrates (linoleate
and arachidonate) and product hydroperoxide
(HPODE) of the lipoxygenase catalytic reaction and one-electron redox
reactions at the iron atom are depicted.
Lipid Binding to Lipoxygenase
The relatively
large size of soybeanlipoxygenase-1 (SBL1) (∼100
kDa) compared to the size of lipids means that detecting a difference
in rotational correlation time of a lipid in solution and one bound
tightly to the enzyme is suitable for EPR studies with spin-labeled
lipids.Spin-labeled lipids used to study interactions with lipoxygenase
are (A) a series of stearic acid derivatives with a doxy ring placed
at different carbon atoms and (B) a lyso-oleoylphosphatidyl choline
with a spin-label replacing one choline methyl group.Doxy-stearates (stearic acid substituted with a
1-oxyl-2,2,4,4-tetramethyloxazolidine
ring, DSAs)[8] and a headgroup spin-labeled
lysolecithin (lyso-oleoylphosphatidylTEMPOcholine, LOPTC)[9] (Figure 3) provided an
overview of the affinity of these lipids for lipoxygenase. The doxyl
lipids have a free radical ring placed at carbons 5, 8, 10, 12, and
16 of the 18-carbon stearate chain. EPR determinations of protein-bound
and free DSAs showed that the affinity of these lipids for the enzyme
depends on the length of the methyl end of the hydrocarbon chain,
and increases with ΔΔG of −190
cal/methylene.[8] (Note that since the entire
DSA length has 18 carbons, in each case, there is also an unfavorable
contribution to ΔΔG from exposure to
solvent of the remaining methylenes on the polar end of the chain.)
The depth of penetration into the hydrophobic cavity is limited by
the bulk of the doxl ring of these stearate analogues. This conclusion
has some analogy to understanding synthetic inhibitors of lipoxygenase
that have long hydrocarbon chains variously substituted with aromatic
rings.[10] To characterize motions of the
polar end of a lipid bound to lipoxygenase, a spin-labeled lyso-lecithin
(LOPTC) was also examined by EPR.[9] In the
absence of protein, this lipid forms small micelles in water with
polar ends extending outward. Close packing of the head groups gives
rise to rapid spin exchange, and a single broad EPR signal. With lipoxygenase
present, monomeric lipid is bound to the protein and the EPR signals
indicate that, although the lipid is tethered to the protein by an
acyl chain, the polar end is highly flexible, consistent with the
polar end extending into solvent.[11]
Figure 3
Spin-labeled lipids used to study interactions with lipoxygenase
are (A) a series of stearic acid derivatives with a doxy ring placed
at different carbon atoms and (B) a lyso-oleoylphosphatidyl choline
with a spin-label replacing one choline methyl group.
The EPR Structure of a Lipid–Lipoxygenase
Complex
Pulsed dipolar EPR spectroscopy (PDS) techniques
are a subset of
time-domain EPR based on pulse sequences that select for dipolar spin–spin
components of relaxation.[12] Dipolar contributions
to relaxation depend on the distance between spin pairs and on the
orientation of the interspin vector in the magnetic field. Spin pairs
are either introduced into a macromolecule by mutation and, generally,
chemical modification, or include a natural spin, for instance an
iron–sulfur center.[13] Dipolar interaction
between nitroxide spin-labels is the most extensively studied, but
nitroxide-to-metal dipolar relaxation provides an emerging alternative.[14,15]To determine the location of the polar end of a lipid substrate
analogue bound to the SBL1 structure, collaboration on PDS experiments
was initiated with Peter Borbat and Jack Freed at the ACERT EPR Center
(Cornell).[9]Lipid polar headgroup
located by pulsed dipolar EPR spectroscopy
with (A) a grid of five lipoxygenase side chains, mutated in pairs
by spin-labeling. The spin-labeled residue numbers are, proceeding
clockwise from the uppermost, F270R1, L480R1, A619R1, and F782R1, and the one in the middle
is A569R1. The chemical structure shown is the spin-label
side chain of R1 that has five rotatable bonds. (B) Calculation
of one-dimensional probability distributions, P(r), based on time-domain decays (see Supporting Information
in ref (9)). Pairs
of residue numbers are indicated, for example, as 480:782 for double-labeled
pair L480R1 and F782R1. Structural inset (B,
upper right) gives the 1 and 2σ volume distribution solved for
the spin of a bound LOPTC (cyan ovals). Pulsed EPR data and analysis
were by Peter Borbat (Cornell). Adapted with permission from parts
of Figures 2, 3, and 6 of ref (9), 2012, Elsevier.The experimental objective was to determine distances from
the
polar end of a paramagnetic lipid to nitroxide spins placed on selected
sites of lipoxygenase, and then by triangulation place the lipid spin.
The lipids examined included primarily LOPTC but also 8-DSA (Figure 3). The internal cavity of SBL1 in the crystal structures
is not open, but it nears the surface in two places that are distant
from each other. A geometrical solution to locating the spin of a
small molecule then requires a minimum of four grid sites that adequately
represent the volume of the macromolecule. We chose five sites near
the surface of the SBL1 structure and introduced spins by mutating
natural side chains to cysteine and reaction with a methanethiosulfonate
reagent that substitutes a spin-label moiety on sulfur, creating the
amino acid R1 (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
Lipid polar headgroup
located by pulsed dipolar EPR spectroscopy
with (A) a grid of five lipoxygenase side chains, mutated in pairs
by spin-labeling. The spin-labeled residue numbers are, proceeding
clockwise from the uppermost, F270R1, L480R1, A619R1, and F782R1, and the one in the middle
is A569R1. The chemical structure shown is the spin-label
side chain of R1 that has five rotatable bonds. (B) Calculation
of one-dimensional probability distributions, P(r), based on time-domain decays (see Supporting Information
in ref (9)). Pairs
of residue numbers are indicated, for example, as 480:782 for double-labeled
pair L480R1 and F782R1. Structural inset (B,
upper right) gives the 1 and 2σ volume distribution solved for
the spin of a bound LOPTC (cyan ovals). Pulsed EPR data and analysis
were by Peter Borbat (Cornell). Adapted with permission from parts
of Figures 2, 3, and 6 of ref (9), 2012, Elsevier.
Final determination of a spin location based on sparse grid sites
spread over a macromolecule requires having approximate coordinates
of at least one site. Criteria for introducing R1 to selected
sites in SBL1 included that the sites be near the surface but in a
niche that was likely to limit side-chain motion (few side chain rotamers).
The relatively large size of SBL1 was an advantage here because most
of the surface is distant from the active site (Figure 4A). Computer programs are available that fit rotamers of commonly
used nitroxide spin-labels into locations in a protein structure.[16−18] Availability of similar crystal structures of four isoforms of lipoxygenase
in soybeans allowed limiting the initial calculated side chain torsion
angle (χ1 and χ2) choices to ones
based on native residue angles. Additional angles χ3 to χ5, derived from calculation, completed the
set (Figure 4A right inset). The SBL1 grid
sites chosen had 1 (F270R1, A619R1, and F782R1), 2 (L480R1) and 10 (A569R1) solutions
with acceptable clash criteria. Coordinates calculated for F782R1, primarily, were chosen to align a grid of spins, from PDS,
with the protein structure coordinates.Distances between the
grid sites depicted in Figure 4A were determined
with the PDS pulse-sequence variations double
electron–electron resonance (DEER) and double quantum coherence
(DQC) applied at 17.3 GHz. Spin labels are composed of three molecular
entities, differing in nitrogen nuclear spin states, that overlap
in one part of the EPR spectrum but are resolved in other parts. Thus,
a hard pulse to the overlap part and detection in a resolved region
can be used to separate pump from detection responses. Examples of
time-domain decays for three doubly labeled samples involving residue
480R1 (left side of Figure 4B) illustrate
the distance-dependent dipolar oscillations. After data processing
(subtraction of singly spin-labeled background and normalization),
the depth of the initial decays indicated that each pair was almost
fully labeled. Decays were also collected after LOPTC (or 8-DSA) was
added to singly labeled SBL1 (examples: right side of Figure 4B). In these cases, the depth of the initial decay
indicated partial occupancy of the protein site by the lipid. Titrations
by DEER, and enzyme inhibition determination, indicated a partially
occupied lipid-binding site under conditions of the experiments (0.8
equiv of LOPTC, 0.2 mM SBL1). Transformation of time-domain data to
a distance probability distribution[12,19] gives a one-dimensional
representation of the range of R1 rotamers that have been
trapped by freezing. The distance distributions (Figure 4B) between spin pairs attached to the protein were more narrowly
defined than for the LOPTC to protein spin pairs. This observation
is consistent with evidence for motion deduced from solution EPR spectra
of the respective spins.[9]Assembling
the 15 distance probability distributions for pairs
of protein–protein and protein–lipid spins into a representation
of the volume, uncertainty, and alignment of LOPTC with the SBL1 structure
was accomplished by statistical analyses (Supporting Information for
ref (9)), similar to
distance-geometry approaches used in NMR. The result is a polyhedron
representing the 1 and 2σ uncertainty of the LOPTC spin, drawn
simply as an ellipsoid (Figure 4B, right upper
structure figure). The major radius in the ellipsoid representation
is ∼6 Å at 2σ, with the width being attributed primarily
to motion of the LOPTC headgroup. This solution overlaps SBL1 side
chains of residues E236, K260, Q264, and Q544. The last three residues
are in helices 2 and 11 of the protein structure and E236 is in a
loop preceding helix 2.[9]
Entrance to Lipoxygenase Substrate Cavity
The headgroup
location of LOPTC, just outside helices 2 and 11,
is consistent with suggestions of an entrance between these helices,
made possible by side chain displacements.[2] As the pH optimum for activity is 8–9 for SBL1, and the pH
of crystals is 7 or less, singly spin-labeled helix 2 mutants were
examined[20] in solution at pH values 7–9
to determine points of flexibility in helix 2. Replacing natural side
chains with the spin-label R1 group was possible at almost
all of the 21 residues, without major adverse effects on enzyme activity.
The study revealed reversible changes in side chain and/or backbone
flexibility with pH. The most flexible residues are those in the center
of SBL1 helix 2 assigned as a π-helix in the crystal structure.
The solution structure of the π-helical segment changes from
having side chains with nanosecond motion that correlates with solvent
exposure in the crystal structure (pH 7) to a state in which these
residues have uniform motion of intermediate rate. Additional changes
in motion are observed when a lipid is added at pH 9. The α-helical
portions of helix 2 have little pH sensitivity under these conditions.
The structure of the π-helix and changes in EPR spectra of that
segment are illustrated in Figure 5. The similarity of line shapes from these residues,
at pH 9, suggests a correlated backbone flexibility that might result,
for example, from hydrogen bonds breaking and reforming in nanoseconds
in this π-helix.[20]
Figure 5
A π-helix in SBL1
helix 2 (upper) has a change in nanosecond
fluctuations in the presence of a substrate analogue and upon a pH
switch from 7 to 9, while few changes (not shown) occur in neighboring
α-helix residues. Mutant lipoxygenases have spin-label R1 groups substituted for natural side chains at single sites
in helix 2. The EPR spectra (X-band, low field portion of spectrum)
of selected R1 substitutions at π-helix residues
263–265 and 267 are shown below. Adapted with permission from
ref (20). Copyright
2014 American Chemical Society.
A π-helix in SBL1
helix 2 (upper) has a change in nanosecond
fluctuations in the presence of a substrate analogue and upon a pH
switch from 7 to 9, while few changes (not shown) occur in neighboring
α-helix residues. Mutant lipoxygenases have spin-label R1 groups substituted for natural side chains at single sites
in helix 2. The EPR spectra (X-band, low field portion of spectrum)
of selected R1 substitutions at π-helix residues
263–265 and 267 are shown below. Adapted with permission from
ref (20). Copyright
2014 American Chemical Society.Relaxation of spin-labeled side chains by the lipoxygenaseferrousmetal was also examined in this study. The natural side chain ultimate
atoms have distances from iron of ∼10–25 Å, meaning
that the metal should cause differential dipolar relaxation, depending
on the nitroxide spin to iron distances. Other factors, including
two symmetries of the iron center and spin-label exposure to solvent
also contributed to rates of relaxation (at 60 K). By examining all
21 residues in helix 2, again, the π-helical segment stood out
as having most variable relaxation rates with solvent pH and lipid
binding conditions.[20] It is suggested that
the flexible π-helical region of lipoxygenase helix 2 is the
site at which substrate gains access to the substrate cavity.
EPR of Metal Centers in Lipoxygenases
Evidence that
both ferric and ferrous oxidation states of iron
are involved in the lipoxygenase catalytic cycle came initially from
observation of a high spin iron-like EPR signal after the enzyme turned
over a single equivalent of substrate, or was exposed to an equivalent
of its own product, a lipid allylic hydroperoxide.[21,22] The resting enzyme did not give a signal at conventional EPR frequencies,
suggesting it is ferrous, now confirmed by other types of spectroscopy.[23]Quantitative accounting for EPR spectra
of metals with more than
one unpaired electron, for example, in the high-spin ferric iron (five
unpaired electrons) of lipoxygenase, is made complex by distributions
in zero field splitting energies (D and E). Yang and Gaffney initiated
calculations to account quantitatively for multiple signals from the
ferric centers in the non-hemeiron proteins phenylalanine hydroxylase
and diferric transferrin.[24] Collaboration
with Silverstone (Johns Hopkins) led to computation of energy levels,
in cases where D and the EPR frequency are of the same magnitude.[25,26] This type of calculation has many applications, one of which leads
to assigning the EPR spectrum of manganeselipoxygenase at 9.4 and
94 GHz,[27] described in subsection 5.2 below.
Iron Lipoxygenases
Initial EPR studies
of ferriclipoxygenase revealed overlapping spectral components, the
relative amounts of which varied with sample preparation details.[28] In the reaction scheme (Figure 2), there should be no free radicals present when iron is ferric,
although ferrous enzyme intermediates have a bound substrate or hydroperoxideradical. But, in the standard method of converting resting ferrouslipoxygenase to a ferric form, by adding one equivalent of lipid hydroperoxide,
one unpaired electron is missing in the spin count. An unassigned
radical derivative of lipid hydroperoxide likely reacts with oxygen,
when oxygen is in excess, and free radical chain reactions are quenched.Origin
of lipoxygenase high-spin ferric, multicomponent EPR signals:
(A) an experimental example from a bacterial lipoxygenase (PaLOX)
and (B) corresponding components of calculated spectra. The distinguishing
features labeled in the calculated 9.4 GHz spectra are at g-values 7.3 (1a), 5.86 (1c), ∼4.7 (1b), 6.3 (2a),
and 5.86 (2b). Each of the calculated spectra labeled “1”
represents the same number of spins and that labeled “2”
has half that amount. A simulated spectrum is based on a distribution
of amplitudes of the subspectra “1”. A simulation of
the experimental spectrum of the lipoxygenase from Pseudomonas
aeruginosa appears in ref (29).Practically, oxidation of dilute (∼2 μM) resting
lipoxygenase
with a single equivalent of hydroperoxide under aerobic conditions
converts all of the iron to ferric, with an EPR signal dominated by
one or two components, after lipid byproducts are removed during sample
concentration. The formation of ferric enzyme is substoichiometric
when carried out with higher protein to oxygen concentrations.[21,29]Discovery of a bacterial lipoxygenase from Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (PaLOX), that occurs naturally with a lipid chain
bound in the active site, provided an opportunity for comparison of
EPR spectra of iron in that cavity with iron in a lipid-free cavity
in ferric SBL1, in collaboration with Manresa and others at Barcelona.[29] Somewhat surprisingly, the ferric form of both
proteins gave EPR spectra that were nearly identical qualitatively
and quantitatively. An experimental spectrum of ferric PaLOX appears
in Figure 6A. Assignment of the EPR spectra
included a distribution of zero field energies as the major line broadening
mechanism,[29] as reported earlier for SBL1
EPR (Figure 6B).[28] In Figure 6B, features of the major component
are labeled 1, and the minor component, 2. Applying a distribution
function to the calculated subspectra results in less broadening of
the lowest field 1a feature than the upfield 1b feature, and thus
an experimental spectrum having almost a single low field peak visible.
The feature 1c is from a transition in an upper pair of energy levels
and has a g-value almost invariant with zero-field
energies, so it becomes more prominent when a distribution in these
energies is significant. (A g-value is (spectrometer
frequency/resonance field position).) A second component, 2, contributes
slightly to the experimental spectrum (Figure 6A), but can be the major component for samples in some buffers. For
example, peaks 1 and 2 contribute almost equally to spectra of samples
prepared in tris buffers.[5] Recent high-resolution
crystal structures do show nonwater solvent molecules in lipoxygenase
cavities.[30] Note that peaks 2b and 1c overlap
at g = 5.86, which is also a g-value
of hemeiron, if any is present as an impurity. Similarly, two symmetries
are seen in ferrous-nitric oxide lipoxygenase EPR spectra. In this
case, the apparent line width is governed more by relaxation than
by distribution in zero field energies and thus is narrower at 94
GHz than at 9.4[31] (Conspectus figure; EPR
spectra adapted with permission from Figure 15 of reference (31), 2009, Springer).
Figure 6
Origin
of lipoxygenase high-spin ferric, multicomponent EPR signals:
(A) an experimental example from a bacterial lipoxygenase (PaLOX)
and (B) corresponding components of calculated spectra. The distinguishing
features labeled in the calculated 9.4 GHz spectra are at g-values 7.3 (1a), 5.86 (1c), ∼4.7 (1b), 6.3 (2a),
and 5.86 (2b). Each of the calculated spectra labeled “1”
represents the same number of spins and that labeled “2”
has half that amount. A simulated spectrum is based on a distribution
of amplitudes of the subspectra “1”. A simulation of
the experimental spectrum of the lipoxygenase from Pseudomonas
aeruginosa appears in ref (29).
High Frequency EPR of Manganese Lipoxygenase
Manganese, instead of iron, is the metal in a fungal lipoxygenase
discovered by Oliw and Su (Uppsala).[7] This
enzyme is also unusual in forming bis-allylic hydroperoxides
and then catalyzing rearrangement of them to allylic hydroperoxide
products characteristic of ironlipoxygenase reactions.[32] Sequence and mutagenesis results suggest protein
side chain ligands to metal and their arrangements are likely the
same as those in iron lipoxygenases. Progress toward a crystal structure
of manganeselipoxygenase is reported[33] and completion should establish structural the similarities, and
differences, of manganese and iron lipoxygenases.In collaboration
with the Oliw group, we asked whether EPR provides evidence for a
collection of N- and O-side chain ligands to metal that are similar
to the iron cases.[27] Oliw had shown that
the Mn2+ state (five unpaired electrons) of the resting
enzyme was observable by EPR and that addition of substrate abolished
this signal (as expected for the even number of unpaired electrons
in Mn3+), thus revealing that maganese lipoxygenase cycles
between 2+ and 3+ states, as do iron versions of the enzyme.[34] However, the Mn2+ EPR spectrum also
confirmed that the value of the zero field splitting (∼0.08
cm–1) was of the same magnitude as the EPR measurement
frequency, 9.4 GHz (or ∼0.32 cm–1). At a
10-fold higher EPR frequency (94 GHz), a spectrum that could be analyzed
more simply was obtained (Figure 7C, D). The
result, in comparison with other manganese containing proteins, suggested
that manganeselipoxygenase has three N- and one or more O- metal
ligands.[27] Even higher EPR frequencies
are being used elesewhere to characterize manganese superoxide dismutases,
enzymes with metal–ligand composition similar to lipoxygenases,
but different geometry.[35]
Figure 7
Transitions
contributing to EPR absorption line shapes of manganese
lipoxygenase at two frequencies: (A) calculations at 9.4 GHZ (X) of
intensities for different angular orientations and pairs of energy
levels (dots) and (B) line shapes resulting from these transitions;
(C) an experimental 94 GHz (W) EPR spectrum of manganese lipoxygenase
and (D) the same calculation of line shapes shown in (B) but at the
higher EPR frequency 94 GHz. Colors show the pair of energy levels
involved in significant transitions (level “1” is lowest
in energy): 1 → 2 (red), 1 → 3 (gray), 1 → 4
(orange), 2 → 3 (black), 2 → 4 (green), 3 → 4
(light brown), 3 → 5 (light blue), 4 → 5 (purple) and
5 → 6 (dark green). Calculation parameters included zero field
energies D = 0.1 cm–1 and E/D = 0.06. The inset in (C) compares the
calculated (lower) and experimental (upper) hyperfine details in the
central transition of manganese lipoxygenase. The straight red lines
in (C) indicate the same magnetic field range in the inset and the
full spectrum. (A) and (B) are adapted with permission from Figure
9 of ref (31) 2009,
Springer; and (C) and (D) are adapted with permission from ref (27) 2001, Springer.
Computation,
to first order, of signals for high spin manganous
(five unpaired electrons) EPR is essentially the same as for high
spin ferric electron centers, except six manganese nuclear hyperfine
splittings are superimposed and energies are generally smaller. Figure 7 illustrates how some of the complexity of X-band
manganous spectra is resolved at a higher EPR frequency.Transitions
contributing to EPR absorption line shapes of manganeselipoxygenase at two frequencies: (A) calculations at 9.4 GHZ (X) of
intensities for different angular orientations and pairs of energy
levels (dots) and (B) line shapes resulting from these transitions;
(C) an experimental 94 GHz (W) EPR spectrum of manganeselipoxygenase
and (D) the same calculation of line shapes shown in (B) but at the
higher EPR frequency 94 GHz. Colors show the pair of energy levels
involved in significant transitions (level “1” is lowest
in energy): 1 → 2 (red), 1 → 3 (gray), 1 → 4
(orange), 2 → 3 (black), 2 → 4 (green), 3 → 4
(light brown), 3 → 5 (light blue), 4 → 5 (purple) and
5 → 6 (dark green). Calculation parameters included zero field
energies D = 0.1 cm–1 and E/D = 0.06. The inset in (C) compares the
calculated (lower) and experimental (upper) hyperfine details in the
central transition of manganeselipoxygenase. The straight red lines
in (C) indicate the same magnetic field range in the inset and the
full spectrum. (A) and (B) are adapted with permission from Figure
9 of ref (31) 2009,
Springer; and (C) and (D) are adapted with permission from ref (27) 2001, Springer.Odd numbers of electrons are most
suitable for EPR. There are six
configurations for the five unpaired electrons of manganous or ferric
ions, and there are 15 possible transitions between the six energy
levels corresponding to these configurations. The probability that
a transition between two levels will be observed at a particular frequency,
field-scan range, and molecular orientation (θ, ϕ) in
the magnetic field is given by an intensity factor[25] (the product of the square of the transition dipole and
sin θ). Taking the zero field term D = 0.1
cm–1 as a first approximation to manganous lipoxygenase
zero field splitting, 9 of the 15 possible pairs of energy levels
contribute significantly to spectra taken at the conventional 9.4
GHz EPR frequency (Figure 7A). In this kind
of diagram, each dot represents a unique molecular orientation in
the field.[25] Most intense features in the
EPR spectrum (Figure 7B) will occur where the
density of dots and their intensities are highest in Figure 7A. At the higher 94 GHz EPR frequency, a spectrum
arising from the same magnetic parameters will be simplified to a
nested set of five transitions. These predictions are born out in
the experimental spectrum of manganeselipoxygenase (Figure 7C) and the simulation (Figure 7D). The middle transitions in the spectra cover a narrow enough field
range that Mn nuclear hyperfine transitions are resolved. Characteristic
details of the hyperfine pattern refined the estimate of zero field
splitting parameters for manganeselipoxygenase to approximately D = 0.08 cm–1 and E/D = 0.06.[27]
Summary and Outlook
Variations in lipoxygenase function
are broader than forming a
lipid hydroperoxide with unique stereochemistry. For instance, the
human epidermal lipoxygenaseeLOX3 appears to have a perfectly normal
iron-binding site, from sequence comparison with functional lipoxygenases.[36] Nevertheless, it is devoid of activity with
normal substrates for lipoxygenases. Instead, it functions catalytically
as a hydroperoxide isomerase, converting preformed hydroperoxides
to epoxyalcohols. Similarly, manganeselipoxygenase isomerizes and
rearranges hydroperoxides, in addition to having a lipoxygenase function.[37] These conversions of lipid hydroperoxides to
epoxyalcohols proceed by an oxygen rebound reaction in which both
O atoms of the cleaved hydroperoxide are retained in the product.
Steric factors and/or the metal redox potential likely influence the
balance of lipoxygenase and isomerase reactions.[37] This Account covers EPR approaches to examine selected
aspects of lipoxygenase structure in solution or frozen solution.
Working with solutions allows flexibility in conditions, for instance,
those leading to changes in structure with pH.[20] A quite obvious extension is to versions of the enzyme
that form products oxidized at different positional sites. More challenging
is to extend these ideas to differentiate details of lipid and hydroperoxide
reactivity by the enzyme. Here some ingenuity in synthesis of paramagnetic
substrate/product analogues will be needed.
Authors: Betty J Gaffney; Miles D Bradshaw; Stephen D Frausto; Fayi Wu; Jack H Freed; Peter Borbat Journal: Biophys J Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Matthew J Kobe; David B Neau; Caitlin E Mitchell; Sue G Bartlett; Marcia E Newcomer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Yulia Y Tyurina; Claudette M St Croix; Simon C Watkins; Alan M Watson; Michael W Epperly; Tamil S Anthonymuthu; Elena R Kisin; Irina I Vlasova; Olga Krysko; Dmitri V Krysko; Alexandr A Kapralov; Haider H Dar; Vladimir A Tyurin; Andrew A Amoscato; Elena N Popova; Sergey B Bolevich; Peter S Timashev; John A Kellum; Sally E Wenzel; Rama K Mallampalli; Joel S Greenberger; Hulya Bayir; Anna A Shvedova; Valerian E Kagan Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: V E Kagan; Y Y Tyurina; W Y Sun; I I Vlasova; H Dar; V A Tyurin; A A Amoscato; R Mallampalli; P C A van der Wel; R R He; A A Shvedova; D I Gabrilovich; H Bayir Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2019-12-25 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Adam R Offenbacher; Shenshen Hu; Erin M Poss; Cody A M Carr; Alexander D Scouras; Daniil M Prigozhin; Anthony T Iavarone; Ali Palla; Tom Alber; James S Fraser; Judith P Klinman Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: Valerian E Kagan; Yulia Y Tyurina; Irina I Vlasova; Alexander A Kapralov; Andrew A Amoscato; Tamil S Anthonymuthu; Vladimir A Tyurin; Indira H Shrivastava; Fatma B Cinemre; Andrew Lamade; Michael W Epperly; Joel S Greenberger; Donald H Beezhold; Rama K Mallampalli; Apurva K Srivastava; Hulya Bayir; Anna A Shvedova Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 6.055