Literature DB >> 25341064

Successful loading of a bone-anchored hearing implant at two weeks after surgery: randomized trial of two surgical methods and detailed stability measurements.

Morten Høgsbro1, Andreas Agger, Lars Vendelbo Johansen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess early implant stability of a bone-anchored hearing implant in detail; safety of loading the implant 2 weeks after surgery; and whether surgical methods influence stability. STUDY
DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, nonblinded study using balanced randomization (1:1).
SETTING: Tertiary referral center in the Central Denmark Region. PATIENTS: Forty-seven adults with normal skin and bone quality. INTERVENTION: Implantation of the BAHA BIA300 system with randomization to a dermatome technique with soft tissue removal or linear incision with no soft tissue reduction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) at 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, and 21 days and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. OTHER OUTCOME MEASURES: Implant loss.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized (linear incision, 25; dermatome, 24). Forty-seven patients were analyzed (linear incision, 25; dermatome, 22). Mean ISQ value was 59.5 at implantation, increasing to 60.5 at 14 days. No stability dip was observed in the early osseointegration period. After loading at 14 days, stability was increasing with a nonsignificant ISQ-dip at 21 days. At 1-year follow-up, mean ISQ was 65.78 (linear incision) and 65.77 (dermatome) (mean difference, 0.010; 95% confidence interval, -2.17 to 2.19). One patient operated on with the dermatome technique had transplant necrosis. No implants were lost.
CONCLUSION: In the study population comprising healthy adults with estimated normal bone quality, early implant stability showed no initial stability dip and the implant was safely loaded 2 weeks after surgery. The surgical methods had no influence on implant stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25341064     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  11 in total

1.  The Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Assessing the Insertion of Bone Conduction Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Tim George Ate Calon; Martin Lars Johansson; Elske Larissa van den Burg; Anna Maria Louisa Janssen; Marc van Hoof; Robert Jan Stokroos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-07-24

2.  Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Hubert T Faber; Catharina A J Dun; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Auditory Osseointegrated Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Christine A den Besten; Joacim Stalfors; Stina Wigren; Johan Ivarsson Blechert; Mark Flynn; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; Rohini Aggarwal; Kevin Green; Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing.

Authors:  Ivo J Kruyt; Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  Review of Bone Conduction Hearing Devices.

Authors:  Susan E Ellsperman; Emily M Nairn; Emily Z Stucken
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-05-18

7.  Laser-Modified Surface Enhances Osseointegration and Biomechanical Anchorage of Commercially Pure Titanium Implants for Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Martin L Johansson; Omar Omar; Hanna Simonsson; Anders Palmquist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation.

Authors:  Marius S Mowinckel; Martin N Møller; Kirsten N Wielandt; Søren Foghsgaard
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim G A Calon; Marc van Hoof; Herbert van den Berge; Arthur J G de Bruijn; Joost van Tongeren; Janny R Hof; Jan Wouter Brunings; Sofia Jonhede; Lucien J C Anteunis; Miranda Janssen; Manuela A Joore; Marcus Holmberg; Martin L Johansson; Robert J Stokroos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Patient Preferences in Sound Processor Loading Time After BAHI Surgery.

Authors:  Coosje Jacoba Isabella Caspers; Ivo Joachim Kruyt; Emmanuel Antonius Maria Mylanus; Rik Chrétien Nelissen; Myrthe Karianne Sophie Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.