Literature DB >> 25339815

Laparoscopic gastric surgery for cancer: where do we stand?

Pantelis T Antonakis1, Hutan Ashrafian1, Alberto Martinez Isla1.   

Abstract

Gastric cancer poses a significant public health problem, especially in the Far East, due to its high incidence in these areas. Surgical treatment and guidelines have been markedly different in the West, but nowadays this debate is apparently coming to an end. Laparoscopic surgery has been employed in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer for two decades now, but with controversies about the extent of resection and lymphadenectomy. Despite these difficulties, the apparent advantages of the laparoscopic approach helped its implementation in early stage and distal gastric cancer, with an increase on the uptake for distal gastrectomy for more advanced disease and total gastrectomy. Nevertheless, there is no conclusive evidence about the laparoscopic approach yet. In this review article we present and analyse the current status of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy; Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Laparoscopic total gastrectomy; Minimally invasive gastrectomy; Robotic gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25339815      PMCID: PMC4202357          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  86 in total

1.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weizhi Wang; Zheng Li; Jie Tang; Meilin Wang; Baolin Wang; Zekuan Xu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Esophagojejunal reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer using a transorally inserted anvil delivery system.

Authors:  J LaFemina; E F Viñuela; M A Schattner; H Gerdes; V E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Hayashi; T Ochiai; H Shimada; Y Gunji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinical experience of 528 laparoscopic gastrectomies on gastric cancer in a single institution.

Authors:  Junhyun Lee; Wook Kim
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Completely laparoscopic total and partial gastrectomy for benign and malignant diseases: a single institute's prospective analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Dulucq; Pascal Wintringer; Jacques Perissat; Ahmad Mahajna
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Is gastric carcinoma different between Japan and the United States?

Authors:  Y Noguchi; T Yoshikawa; A Tsuburaya; H Motohashi; M S Karpeh; M F Brennan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

Authors:  Eduardo F Viñuela; Mithat Gonen; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Totally laparoscopic total and subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection for early and advanced gastric cancer: early and long-term results of a 100-patient series.

Authors:  Cristiano G S Huscher; Andrea Mingoli; Giovanna Sgarzini; Gioia Brachini; Barbara Binda; Massimiliano Di Paola; Cecilia Ponzano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Oh Jeong; Young-Kyu Park
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Technical pro & cons of the laparoscopic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Riccardo Rosati; Paolo Parise; Fabio Giannone Codiglione
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-27

3.  Impact of geriatric nutritional risk index on outcomes after gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Hiroaki Saito; Tomohiro Osaki; Sadamu Takahashi; Akemi Iwamoto; Kenji Fukuda; Kenjiro Taniguchi; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tsutomu Takeuchi; Kenji Sugamura; Kenichi Sumi; Kuniyuki Katano; Yuji Shishido; Kozo Miyatani; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Quality of life as a fundamental outcome after curative intent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: lessons learned from patients.

Authors:  Rodrigo Nascimento Pinheiro; Samantha Mucci; Renato Morato Zanatto; Olavo Magalhães Picanço Junior; Augusto Angelo Granado Bottino; Renata Pereira Fontoura; Gaspar de Jesus Lopes Filho
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-10

5.  Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study.

Authors:  Fabio Cianchi; Giampiero Indennitate; Giacomo Trallori; Manuela Ortolani; Beatrice Paoli; Giuseppe Macrì; Gabriele Lami; Beatrice Mallardi; Benedetta Badii; Fabio Staderini; Etleva Qirici; Antonio Taddei; Maria Novella Ringressi; Luca Messerini; Luca Novelli; Siro Bagnoli; Andrea Bonanomi; Caterina Foppa; Ileana Skalamera; Giulia Fiorenza; Giuliano Perigli
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Short-term outcomes in minimally invasive versus open gastrectomy: the differences between East and West. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicole van der Wielen; Jennifer Straatman; Miguel A Cuesta; Freek Daams; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 7.  Health-related quality of life after gastric cancer treatment in Brazil: Narrative review and reflections.

Authors:  Rodrigo Nascimento Pinheiro; Samantha Mucci; Renato Morato Zanatto; Olavo Magalhães Picanço Junior; Alexandre Ferreira Oliveira; Gaspar de Jesus Lopes Filho
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 8.  Current status of robotic surgery in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuo Nishimura
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-03-03

9.  Comparison of surgical outcomes between integrated robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Chul Kyu Roh; Seohee Choi; Won Jun Seo; Minah Cho; Yoon Young Choi; Taeil Son; Woo Jin Hyung; Hyoung-Il Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.