Literature DB >> 25339811

Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes.

Shuyin Liang1, Usmaan Hameed1, Shiva Jayaraman1.   

Abstract

The application of minimally invasive approaches to pancreatic resection for benign and malignant diseases has been growing in the last two decades. Studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is feasible and safe, and many of them show that compared to open distal pancreatectomy, LDP has decreased blood loss and length of hospital stay, and equivalent post-operative complication rates and short-term oncologic outcomes. LDP is becoming the procedure of choice for benign or small low-grade malignant lesions in the distal pancreas. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has not yet been widely adopted. There is no clear evidence in favor of MIPD over open pancreaticoduodenectomy in operative time, blood loss, length of stay or rate of complications. Robotic surgery has recently been applied to pancreatectomy, and many of the advantages of laparoscopy over open surgery have been observed in robotic surgery. Laparoscopic enucleation is considered safe for patients with small, benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas that is amenable to parenchyma-preserving procedure. As surgeons' experience with advanced laparoscopic and robotic skills has been growing around the world, new innovations and breakthrough in minimally invasive pancreatic procedures will evolve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal pancreatectomy; Enucleation; Laparoscopy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic pancreatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25339811      PMCID: PMC4202353          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  66 in total

1.  Laparoscopic assisted duodenopancreatectomy.

Authors:  C Staudacher; E Orsenigo; P Baccari; S Di Palo; S Crippa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases.

Authors:  J L Dulucq; P Wintringer; A Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

6.  Are major laparoscopic pancreatic resections worthwhile? A prospective study of 32 patients in a single institution.

Authors:  J L Dulucq; P Wintringer; C Stabilini; T Feryn; J Perissat; A Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp; M F Herrera
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  C N Tang; K K Tsui; J P Y Ha; D C T Wong; M K W Li
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

10.  Initial experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  M D'Angelica; C Are; W Jarnagin; G DeGregoris; D Coit; D Jaques; M Brennan; Y Fong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  18 in total

1.  The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Jaewoo Kwon; Young-Joo Lee; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Sang Hyun Shin; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung Koo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sang Soo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Tae Jun Song; Guisuk Park; Yejong Park; Seung Jae Lee; Song Cheol Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach.

Authors:  Takanori Morikawa; Masaharu Ishida; Tatsuyuki Takadate; Tatsuo Hata; Masahiro Iseki; Kei Kawaguchi; Hideo Ohtsuka; Masamichi Mizuma; Hiroki Hayashi; Kei Nakagawa; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Takashi Kamei; Takeshi Naitoh; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy-a propensity score-matched analysis from the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

Authors:  Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Detlef K Bartsch; Ioannis Mintziras; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Uwe Wittel; Hans-Jörg Krämling; Hubert Preissinger-Heinzel; Matthias Anthuber; Bernd Geissler; Jörg Köninger; Katharina Feilhauer; Merten Hommann; Luisa Peter; Natascha C Nüssler; Thomas Klier; Ulrich Mansmann; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Go Wakabayashi; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Allan Tsung; Kehu Yang; Brian K P Goh; Charing Ching-Ning Chong; Chang Moo Kang; Chenghong Peng; Eli Kakiashvili; Ho-Seong Han; Hong-Jin Kim; Jin He; Jae Hoon Lee; Kyoichi Takaori; Marco Vito Marino; Shen-Nien Wang; Tiankang Guo; Thilo Hackert; Ting-Shuo Huang; Yiengpruksawan Anusak; Yuman Fong; Yuichi Nagakawa; Yi-Ming Shyr; Yao-Ming Wu; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resections in two medium-sized medical centres.

Authors:  Gian Luca Baiocchi; Edoardo Rosso; Andrea Celotti; Giuseppe Zimmiti; Alberto Manzoni; Marco Garatti; Guido Tiberio; Nazario Portolani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-02-28

Review 6.  Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Trends.

Authors:  Georgios D Lianos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou; Konstantinos H Katsanos; Christos Katsios; Georgios K Glantzounis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-06

7.  Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference.

Authors:  Bjørn Edwin; Mushegh A Sahakyan; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink; Marco Braga; Jean-Michel Fabre; Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Brice Gayet; Song Cheol Kim; Igor E Khatkov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Postoperative Omental Infarct After Distal Pancreatectomy: Appearance, Etiology Management, and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Ammar A Javed; Fabio Bagante; Ralph H Hruban; Matthew J Weiss; Martin A Makary; Kenzo Hirose; John L Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Regis Souche; David Fuks; Julie Perinel; Astrid Herrero; Françoise Guillon; Isabelle Pirlet; Thierry Perniceni; Frederic Borie; Antonio Sa Cunha; Brice Gayet; Jean-Michel Fabre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Distal pancreatic resection for neuroendocrine tumors: is laparoscopic really better than open?

Authors:  Dimitrios Xourafas; Ali Tavakkoli; Thomas E Clancy; Stanley W Ashley
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.