PURPOSE: Neuroimaging techniques including structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional positron emission tomography (PET) are useful in categorizing various midbrain-hindbrain (MHB) malformations, both in allowing diagnosis and in helping to understand the developmental processes that were disturbed. Brain imaging phenotypes of numerous malformations are characteristic features that help in guiding the genetic testing in case of direct neuroimaging-genotype correlation or, at least, to differentiate among MHB malformations entities. The present review aims to provide the reader with an update of the use of neuroimaging applications in the fine analysis of MHB malformations, using a comprehensive, recently proposed developmental and genetic classification. METHODS: We have performed an extensive systematic review of the literature, from the embryology main steps of MHB development through the malformations entities, with regard to their molecular and genetic basis, conventional MRI features, and other neuroimaging characteristics. RESULTS: We discuss disorders in which imaging features are distinctive and how these features reflect the structural and functional impairment of the brain. CONCLUSION: Recognition of specific MRI phenotypes, including advanced imaging features, is useful to recognize the MHB malformation entities, to suggest genetic investigations, and, eventually, to monitor the disease outcome after supportive therapies.
PURPOSE: Neuroimaging techniques including structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional positron emission tomography (PET) are useful in categorizing various midbrain-hindbrain (MHB) malformations, both in allowing diagnosis and in helping to understand the developmental processes that were disturbed. Brain imaging phenotypes of numerous malformations are characteristic features that help in guiding the genetic testing in case of direct neuroimaging-genotype correlation or, at least, to differentiate among MHB malformations entities. The present review aims to provide the reader with an update of the use of neuroimaging applications in the fine analysis of MHB malformations, using a comprehensive, recently proposed developmental and genetic classification. METHODS: We have performed an extensive systematic review of the literature, from the embryology main steps of MHB development through the malformations entities, with regard to their molecular and genetic basis, conventional MRI features, and other neuroimaging characteristics. RESULTS: We discuss disorders in which imaging features are distinctive and how these features reflect the structural and functional impairment of the brain. CONCLUSION: Recognition of specific MRI phenotypes, including advanced imaging features, is useful to recognize the MHB malformation entities, to suggest genetic investigations, and, eventually, to monitor the disease outcome after supportive therapies.
Authors: F McAuliffe; D Chitayat; W Halliday; S Keating; V Shah; M Fink; O Nevo; G Ryan; P Shannon; S Blaser Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Matthan W A Caan; Peter G Barth; Jikke-Mien Niermeijer; Charles B Majoie; Bwee Tien Poll-The Journal: Eur J Paediatr Neurol Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 3.140
Authors: L R Ment; H S Bada; P Barnes; P E Grant; D Hirtz; L A Papile; J Pinto-Martin; M Rivkin; T L Slovis Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-06-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Filippo Arrigoni; Romina Romaniello; Denis Peruzzo; Andrea Poretti; Maria Teresa Bassi; Carlo Pierpaoli; Enza Maria Valente; Sara Nuovo; Eugen Boltshauser; Thierry André Gerard Marie Huisman; Fabio Triulzi; Renato Borgatti Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: D A Herrera; N O Ruge; M M Florez; S A Vargas; M Ochoa-Escudero; M Castillo Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexander Lauda; Andreas Bruehschwein; Joanna Ficek; Martin J Schmidt; André Klima; Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg; Andrea Fischer Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2018-01-22
Authors: G O Dovjak; M C Diogo; P C Brugger; G M Gruber; M Weber; S Glatter; R Seidl; D Bettelheim; D Prayer; G J Kasprian Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 7.299