Literature DB >> 25339225

The differential contribution of GluN1 and GluN2 to the gating operation of the NMDA receptor channel.

Ya-Chi Tu1, Chung-Chin Kuo.   

Abstract

The Ν-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channel is an obligatory heterotetramer formed by two GluN1 and two GluN2 subunits. However, the differential contribution of the two different subunits to channel operation is not clear. We found that the apparent affinity of glycine to GluN1 (K gly ∼ 0.6 μM) is much higher than NMDA or glutamate to GluN2 (K NMDA ∼ 36 μM, K glu ∼ 4.8 μM). The binding rate constant (derived from the linear regression of the apparent macroscopic binding rates) of glycine to GluN1 (∼9.8 × 10(6) M(-1) s(-1)), however, is only slightly faster than NMDA to GluN2 (∼4.1 × 10(6) M(-1) s(-1)). Accordingly, the apparent unbinding rates of glycine from activated GluN1 (time constant ∼2 s) are much slower than NMDA from activated GluN2 (time constant ∼70 ms). Moreover, the decay of NMDA currents upon wash-off of both glycine and NMDA seems to follow the course of NMDA rather than glycine unbinding. But if only glycine is washed off, the current decay is much slower, apparently following the course of glycine unbinding. The apparent binding rate of glycine to the fully deactivated channel, in the absence of NMDA, is roughly the same as that measured with co-application of both ligands, whereas the apparent binding rate of NMDA to the fully deactivated channel in the absence of glycine is markedly slower. In this regard, it is interesting that the seventh residue in the highly conserved SYTANLAAF motif (A7) in GluN1 and GluN2 are so close that they may interact with each other to control the dimension of the external pore mouth. Moreover, specific mutations involving A7 in GluN1 but not in GluN2 result in channels showing markedly enhanced affinity to both glycine and NMDA and readily activated by only NMDA, as if the channel is already partially activated. We conclude that GluN2 is most likely directly responsible for the activation gate of the NMDA channel, whereas GluN1 assumes a role of more global control, especially on the gating conformational changes in GluN2. Structurally, this intersubunit regulatory interaction seems to involve the SYTANLAAF motif, especially the A7 residue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25339225     DOI: 10.1007/s00424-014-1630-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pflugers Arch        ISSN: 0031-6768            Impact factor:   3.657


  54 in total

1.  Mutation of a glutamate receptor motif reveals its role in gating and delta2 receptor channel properties.

Authors:  K Kohda; Y Wang; M Yuzaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The NMDA receptor M3 segment is a conserved transduction element coupling ligand binding to channel opening.

Authors:  Kevin S Jones; Hendrika M A VanDongen; Antonius M J VanDongen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  The glutamate receptor ion channels.

Authors:  R Dingledine; K Borges; D Bowie; S F Traynelis
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  The tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel.

Authors:  C Rosenmund; Y Stern-Bach; C F Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Kinetic analysis of antagonist action at N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors. Two binding sites each for glutamate and glycine.

Authors:  M Benveniste; M L Mayer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Neurodegeneration in Lurcher mice caused by mutation in delta2 glutamate receptor gene.

Authors:  J Zuo; P L De Jager; K A Takahashi; W Jiang; D J Linden; N Heintz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Structure of the NMDA receptor channel M2 segment inferred from the accessibility of substituted cysteines.

Authors:  T Kuner; L P Wollmuth; A Karlin; P H Seeburg; B Sakmann
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Crystal structure of a heterotetrameric NMDA receptor ion channel.

Authors:  Erkan Karakas; Hiro Furukawa
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Stabilizing the closed S6 gate in the Shaker Kv channel through modification of a hydrophobic seal.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kitaguchi; Manana Sukhareva; Kenton J Swartz
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  NMDA receptor structures reveal subunit arrangement and pore architecture.

Authors:  Chia-Hsueh Lee; Wei Lü; Jennifer Carlisle Michel; April Goehring; Juan Du; Xianqiang Song; Eric Gouaux
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  Modulation of NMDA channel gating by Ca2+ and Cd2+ binding to the external pore mouth.

Authors:  Ya-Chi Tu; Ya-Chin Yang; Chung-Chin Kuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Cadmium activates AMPA and NMDA receptors with M3 helix cysteine substitutions.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilding; James E Huettner
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Impaired Cognitive Function and Altered Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity in Mice Lacking Dermatan Sulfotransferase Chst14/D4st1.

Authors:  Qifa Li; Xuefei Wu; Xueyan Na; Biying Ge; Qiong Wu; Xuewen Guo; Michael Ntim; Yue Zhang; Yiping Sun; Jinyi Yang; Zhicheng Xiao; Jie Zhao; Shao Li
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.639

4.  The effect of high pressure on the NMDA receptor: molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Alice Bliznyuk; Yoram Grossman; Yevgeny Moskovitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.