Literature DB >> 25338730

The effect of competing direct-to-consumer advertising campaigns on the use of drugs for benign prostatic hyperplasia: time series analysis.

Sean C Skeldon1, Katy B Kozhimannil, Sumit R Majumdar, Michael R Law.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) remains a controversial issue, with concerns that it leads to unnecessary and inappropriate prescribing. Whether DTCA shifts prescribing from first-line (guideline-recommended) therapy to second-line drugs has not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of sequential DTCA campaigns for two drugs used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): one newer agent, dutasteride (Avodart(®)), and one older first-line agent, tamsulosin (Flomax(®)).
DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis was used to assess the impact of each DTCA campaign using data on consumer "response" from Google Trends and dispensed prescriptions from IMS Health. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed data for the United States from January 2003 to December 2007. INTERVENTION: DTCA for dutasteride and tamsulosin commenced on July, 2005 and April, 2006, respectively. MAIN MEASURES: Monthly Internet search volume (scaled from 0 to 100) for the advertised trade name of each drug and monthly U.S. prescription rates per 1,000 population were analyzed. KEY
RESULTS: The dutasteride campaign was associated with an increase in Internet searches for both "Avodart" (level change +31.3 %, 95 % CI: 27.2-35.4) and "Flomax" (level change +8.3 %, 95 % CI: 0.9-15.7), whereas the tamsulosin campaign was associated with increased "Flomax" searches (level change +25.3 %, 95 % CI: 18.7-31.8). The dutasteride campaign was associated with an increase in the prescription of dutasteride (trend = 0.45/month, 95 % CI: 0.33-0.56), but a larger impact was observed with tamsulosin prescriptions (trend = 0.76/month, 95 % CI: 0.02-1.50). Similarly, the tamsulosin campaign was associated with an immediate fourfold increase in the prescribing of tamsulosin (level change +5.76 units, 95 % CI: 1.79-9.72) compared to dutasteride (level change +1.47 units, 95 % CI: 0.79-2.14).
CONCLUSIONS: DTCA was associated with the utilization of drugs to treat symptomatic BPH. However, both campaigns were associated with greater increases in the use of the guideline-recommended first-line agent. DTCA campaigns may increase the overall levels of guideline-recommended treatments to a greater extent than the specific advertised agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25338730      PMCID: PMC4371008          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3063-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  26 in total

1.  Relationship between direct-to-consumer advertising and physician diagnosing and prescribing.

Authors:  Woodie M Zachry; Marvin D Shepherd; Melvin J Hinich; James P Wilson; Carolyn M Brown; Kenneth A Lawson
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  Direct-to-consumer advertising--strengthening our health care system.

Authors:  Alan F Holmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia--are two drugs better than one?

Authors:  E Darracott Vaughan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research.

Authors:  A K Wagner; S B Soumerai; F Zhang; D Ross-Degnan
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Time to ban direct-to-consumer prescription drug marketing.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Costs and consequences of direct-to-consumer advertising for clopidogrel in Medicaid.

Authors:  Michael R Law; Stephen B Soumerai; Alyce S Adams; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-23

Review 7.  Advertising of prescription-only medicines to the public: does evidence of benefit counterbalance harm?

Authors:  Barbara Mintzes
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Comparison of clinical trials with finasteride and dutasteride.

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

9.  Direct-to-consumer and physician promotion of tegaserod correlated with physician visits, diagnoses, and prescriptions.

Authors:  Spencer D Dorn; Joel F Farley; Richard A Hansen; Nilay D Shah; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers, 2001-2010.

Authors:  Rachel Kornfield; Julie Donohue; Ernst R Berndt; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Asthma Medication Sales and Healthcare Use.

Authors:  Matthew Daubresse; Susan Hutfless; Yoonsang Kim; Rachel Kornfield; Dima M Qato; Jidong Huang; Kay Miller; Sherry L Emery; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Direct to consumer advertising: the case for greater consumer control.

Authors:  Idris Guessous; Chiranjeev Dash
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A failure to communicate.

Authors:  Mitchell D Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Impact of direct-to-consumer drug advertising during the Super Bowl on drug utilization.

Authors:  Matthew P Gray; Alvaro San-Juan-Rodriguez; Nemin Chen; Chester B Good; Inmaculada Hernandez
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2019-12-09

5.  Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amaryllis Mavragani; Gabriela Ochoa; Konstantinos P Tsagarakis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.