| Literature DB >> 25337590 |
In-Chul Lee1, Dae Yong Kim2, Bu Young Choi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health beneficial effects of blueberry have been well documented. Obesity is health hazard that is associated with metabolic abnormalities. We investigated the effect of blueberry leaf extract (BBLE) on high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity in C57BL/6J mice.Entities:
Keywords: Adipocytes; Blueberry leaf extracts; High-fat diet-induced obesity
Year: 2014 PMID: 25337590 PMCID: PMC4189509 DOI: 10.15430/JCP.2014.19.3.209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer Prev ISSN: 2288-3649
Effect of BBLE treatment on body weight in HFD-induced obesity mouse model C57BL/6J mice
| Group
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | PC | B | |
| Water intake (ml) | 3.12 ± 0.93 | 1.96 ± 0.12 | 2.07 ± 0.18 | 3.07 ± 1.17 |
| Food intake (g) | 3.08 ± 0.93 | 2.68 ± 0.24 | 2.76 ± 0.21 | 2.74 ± 0.33 |
| Initial weight (g) | 24.44 ± 1.21 | 33.34 ± 2.35 | 32.88 ± 2.47 | 33.08 ± 1.34 |
| Body weight gain (g) | 3.61 ± 1.18 | 11.48 ± 1.57 | 8.83 ± 2.02 | 5.53 ± 1.41 |
Data are expressed as means ± s.d. (n = 6). ANOVA with duncan’s test:
P < 0.01, significantly from the value of the HFD group.
N, negative control mice;
C, high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice;
PC, administration of catechin in HFD-fed mice;
B, administration of Blueberry leaves extract (BBLE) in HFD-fed mice.
Effect of BBLE treatment on serum parameter in HFD-induced obesity mouse model C57BL/6J mice
| Group
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | PC | B | |
| WBC (k/μl) | 10.158 ± 0.429 | 14.652 ± 0.329 | 9.9475 ± 0.517 | 10.599 ± 0.126 |
| Neutrophil (k/μl) | 4.635 ± 0.288 | 6.192 ± 0.313 | 4.0675 ± 0.227 | 4.493 ± 0.155 |
| Lymphocyte (k/μl) | 5.375 ± 0.228 | 8.198 ± 0.314 | 5.6125 ± 0.447 | 5.803 ± 0.078 |
| Monocyte (k/μl) | 0.1325 ± 0.127 | 0.216 ± 0.123 | 0.24 ± 0.093 | 0.266 ± 0.058 |
| Eosinophil (k/μl) | 0.0175 ± 0.005 | 0.036 ± 0.015 | 0.0175 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.017 |
| Basophil (k/μl) | 0.0025 ± 0.005 | 0.01 ± 0.012 | 0.005 ± 0.006 | 0.0033 ± 0.006 |
| RBC (M/μl) | 683 ± 14.468 | 843.6 ± 8.385 | 675.75 ± 10.436 | 712 ± 8.544 |
| Hb (g/dl) | 17.375 ± 0.206 | 21.56 ± 0.688 | 17.15 ± 0.404 | 17.9 ± 0.265 |
| HCT (%) | 49.55 ± 0.624 | 54.34 ± 0.627 | 47.175 ± 0.299 | 47.666 ± 0.513 |
| Platelet (k/μl) | 700 ± 19.494 | 855.8 ± 22.521 | 704.25 ± 14.408 | 717.333 ± 23.072 |
| AST (U/L) | 74.60 ± 3.13 | 122.60 ± 3.85 | 75.00 ± 3.37 | 88.67 ± 3.06 |
| ALT (U/L) | 57.00 ± 2.12 | 87.00 ± 2.24 | 57.50 ± 2.38 | 69.33 ± 0.58 |
| ALP (U/L) | 172.80 ± 3.42 | 276.20 ± 6.14 | 183.50 ± 3.42 | 189.33 ± 2.52 |
| LDH (mmol/mL) | 332.00 ± 13.04 | 548.00 ± 11.77 | 390.50 ± 4.20 | 400.67 ± 8.33 |
| HDL-C (mmol/mL) | 118.00 ± 3.39 | 78.60 ± 2.97 | 99.50 ± 6.03 | 102.67 ± 6.03 |
| LDL-C (mmol/mL) | 42.60 ± 3.51 | 133.60 ± 3.78 | 90.25 ± 3.77 | 97.67 ± 4.04 |
| Glucose (mmol/mL) | 80.4 ± 4.22 | 126.40 ± 6.27 | 90.0 ± 3.65 | 94.67 ± 4.16 |
| Insulin (μU/mL) | 21.34 ± 1.75 | 41.98 ± 1.33 | 24.50 ± 1.00 | 24.33 ± 1.15 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 43.00 ± 5.70 | 174.40 ± 4.28 | 94.00 ± 1.83 | 88.33 ± 6.11 |
| T-CHOL (mg/dL) | 59.00 ± 1.58 | 117.00 ± 4.69 | 83.50 ± 2.65 | 100.00 ± 6.00 |
K/μL: ×103/mm3, M/μL: ×106/mm3. Data are expressed as means ± s.d. (n = 6). Duncan’s test:
P < 0.01 significantly from the value of the HFD group. WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine transaminase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lip-oprotein-cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; T-CHOL, total cholesterol.
Figure 1.Effect of BBLE on tissue morphology. (A) Liver morphology (magnification ×400). (B) Epididymal adipose tissue morphology (magnification ×400). N, negative control mice; C, high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice; PC, HFD-fed mice + catechin; B, HFD-fed mice + BBLE.
Figure 2.Gene expression was determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. ACC, acetyl coenzyme A carbox-ylase; PPAR-γ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; N, negative control mice; C, HFD-fed mice; PC, administration of catechin in HFD-fed mice; B, administration of BBLE in HFD-fed mice. Data are expressed as means ± s.d. (n = 6). Duncan’s test: *P < 0.01 significantly from the value of the HFD group.
Effect of antioxidant in HFD-induced obesity mouse model C57BL/6J mice
| Group
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | PC | B | |
| SOD | 34.27 ± 1.04 | 14.07 ± 0.86 | 37.47 ± 0.76 | 32.05 ± 0.77 |
| CAT | 6.40 ± 0.42 | 3.83 ± 0.40 | 8.05 ± 0.26 | 6.11 ± 0.25 |
| XO | 1.63 ± 0.06 | 2.37 ± 0.12 | 1.33 ± 0.06 | 1.59 ± 0.08 |
| TBARS | 2.31 ± 0.11 | 4.95 ± 0.30 | 1.80 ± 0.08 | 2.46 ± 0.10 |
Data are expressed as means ± s.d. (n = 6). ANOVA with duncan’s test:
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 significantly from the value of the HFD group. N, negative control mice; C, HFD-fed mice; PC, administration of catechin in HFD-fed mice; B, administration of BBLE in HFD-fed mice;
SOD, superoxide dismutase;
CAT, catalase;
XO, xanthine oxidase;
TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.