Literature DB >> 9440370

Calcium potentiates the effect of estrogen and calcitonin on bone mass: review and analysis.

J W Nieves1, L Komar, F Cosman, R Lindsay.   

Abstract

We reviewed published clinical trials that measured bone mass of postmenopausal women from at least one skeletal site to evaluate whether calcium supplementation influenced the efficacy of estrogens and intranasal calcitonin on bone mass change. We compared results of the administration of oral estrogen or nasal calcitonin in conjuction with additional calcium intake either through diet or supplements compared with those of estrogen or calcitonin alone. Of the 31 published estrogen trials analyzed, 20 modified the diet or used a calcium supplement (total 1183 mg/d) and 11 did not (total 563 mg/d). The mean increase in bone mass of the lumbar spine when estrogen was given alone was 1.3%/y (n = 5) compared with 3.3%/y when estrogen was given in conjunction with calcium (n = 14; P = 0.01). The mean increase in bone mass of the femoral neck with estrogen alone (n = 3) was only 0.9%/y compared with 2.4%/y when calcium was given with estrogen (n = 6; P = 0.04). Similarly, forearm bone mass increased 0.4%/y with estrogen alone (n = 7) compared with 2.1%/y when estrogen was given with calcium (n = 12; P = 0.04). Similar results were found when weighted means were calculated. Of the seven published trials evaluating the effects of 200 IU nasal salmon calcitonin, six also used calcium supplements (total 1466 mg/d) whereas one used calcitonin alone (total 627 mg/d). Bone mass of the lumbar spine increased 2.1% with calcitonin plus calcium supplementation compared with -0.2%/y with calcitonin alone. These results suggest that a high calcium intake potentiates the positive effect of estrogen on bone mass at all skeletal sites and perhaps that of calcitonin on bone mass of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9440370     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/67.1.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  27 in total

Review 1.  Hormone replacement therapy: where are we now?

Authors:  C Stuenkel; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-07

Review 2.  Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  C J Rosen
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Exercise frequency and calcium intake predict 4-year bone changes in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Ellen C Cussler; Scott B Going; Linda B Houtkooper; Vanessa A Stanford; Robert M Blew; Hilary G Flint-Wagner; Lauve L Metcalfe; Ji-Eun Choi; Timothy G Lohman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Favorable effect of dietary vitamin C on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women (KNHANES IV, 2009): discrepancies regarding skeletal sites, age, and vitamin D status.

Authors:  Y A Kim; K M Kim; S Lim; S H Choi; J H Moon; J H Kim; S W Kim; H C Jang; C S Shin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

6.  Gelidium amansii ethanol extract suppresses fat accumulation by down-regulating adipogenic transcription factors in ob/ob mice model.

Authors:  Mi-Hwa Park; Ji-Hye Kang; Hak-Ju Kim; Ji-Sook Han
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.391

7.  Importance of calcium co-medication in bisphosphonate therapy of osteoporosis: an approach to improving correct intake and drug adherence.

Authors:  Johann D Ringe; Stefan A P van der Geest; Gerd Möller
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Estrogen treatment does not reduce fractures?

Authors:  J Christopher Gallagher
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Isoflavones with supplemental calcium provide greater protection against the loss of bone mass and strength after ovariectomy compared to isoflavones alone.

Authors:  Pearl L Breitman; Debbie Fonseca; Angela M Cheung; Wendy E Ward
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Patient preference and acceptability of calcium plus vitamin D3 supplementation: a randomised, open, cross-over trial.

Authors:  Debby den Uyl; Piet P M M Geusens; Frank N R van Berkum; Harry H M L Houben; Max C Jebbink; Willem F Lems
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.