Literature DB >> 25337565

Immunohistochemical Assessment of O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) and Its Relationship with p53 Expression in Endometrial Cancers.

Kyung Eun Lee1.   

Abstract

O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair protein, the loss of MGMT expression was commonly known due to hypermethylation of CpG islands in its promoter region. Overexpression of p53 protein may be associated with downregulated MGMT expression in brain tumors. The aims of this study were to investigate the role of MGMT expression loss and its correlation with p53 overexpression in endometrial cancers. MGMT and p53 expression was examined in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 36 endometrial cancer cases using immnunohistochemical staining. The loss of MGMT expression was detected in 11 (30.6%) out of the 36 endometrial cancers and p53 immunoreactivity was detected in 23 (63.9%) out of the 36 endometrial cancers. Ten (90.9%) of the 11 cases with negative MGMT immunoreactivity showed positive p53 expression, so the loss of MGMT expression was significantly associated with the p53 overexpression (P=0.03). These findings suggest that the loss of MGMT expression may be one of factors capable of p53 overexpression in endometrial cancer. Further studies are needed to define the relation between MGMT and p53 for examining the mechanisms of tissue-specific MGMT expression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; Immunohistochemistry; O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT); p53

Year:  2013        PMID: 25337565      PMCID: PMC4189440          DOI: 10.15430/jcp.2013.18.4.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 2288-3649


INTRODUCTION

O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair protein that protects cells against the carcinogenic and cytotoxic effects of alkylating agents.1 MGMT activity has been determined in various types of tumors, and was found to be relatively high in colon, ovary, breast and brain cancers.2,3 The lack of MGMT expression may be related to the development of gliomas,4 non-small cell lung cancers,5 and colon cancers.6,7 In the absence of MGMT activity, O6-alkylguanine mispairs with thymine during DNA replication and results in guanine-cytosine to adenine-thymine transitions.6,8 Other studies that showed loss of MGMT protein expression associated with methylation in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and colorectal and brain tumors.6,7 Aberrant methylation of 5’ cytosine residues of a guanine residue in CpG islands in the promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes is an important mechanism of gene transcriptional inactivation and has been associated with tumorigenesis. Several studies have provided evidence of the linkage between epigenetic inactivation of MGMT and the appearance of G to A transition mutations in genes in human primary tumors.6 Tumor suppressor gene p53 plays an important role in the cell cycle, DNA damage, cell death and cell differentiation, and it is commonly mutated in human tumors.9 Several studies have suggested the involvement of p53 protein in the expression of the MGMT gene. There are studies reported that MGMT gene expression was significantly lower in p53 altered tumors,4 and MGMT promoter methylation may increase the occurrence of p53 mutation in lung cancer.10 Other studies reported that wild-type p53 acts as an inhibitor of MGMT gene expression.11 To the best of our knowledge, the relationship between MGMT and p53 expression in tissues of endometrial cancer has not yet been studied in Korea. So we investigated the expression patterns of MGMT and p53 using immunohistochemistry to elucidate the tissues-specific relationship between MGMT and p53 expressions in endometrial cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue samples

A retrospective study was carried out on 36 cases with well differentiated endometrial adenocarcinomas admitted in local hospital from 2008 to 2010 in Busan. The ages of the 36 patients ranged from 34 to 68 years (median age: 52 years). All cancer cases were obtained endometrial curettage, and histopathologically confirmed and had no preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The HE stained were reviewed in each case to confirm the original diagnosis, which was based on the FIGO classification.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Immunohistochemical study for MGMT and p53 was performed on the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, 4 μm thick tissue section using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Deparaffinization of all the sections was performed through a series of xylene baths, and rehydration was performed with a series of graded alcohol solutions. To enhance immunoreactivity, microwave antigen retrieval was performed at 750 W for 30 min in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0). After blocking endogenous peroxidase activity with 5% hydrogen peroxidase for 10 min, primary antibody incubation was performed for 1 hour at room temperature. The primary antibody was a mouse monoclonal antibody directed against MGMT (Lab Vision, Fremont CA, USA) and p53 (DakoCytomation, Denmark) used in a 1:100 dilution. An Envision Chem Kit (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA) was used for the secondary antibody at room temperature for 30 min. After washing the tissue samples in Tris-buffered saline for 10 min, 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine was used as a chromogen, and Gill’s hematoxylin counterstain was applied.

Interpretation of immunohistochemical analysis

All the slides were evaluated without knowledge of any of the clinicopathologic data. Immunoreactivity for MGMT expression was defined by presence of nuclear and cytoplasmic staining and that for p53 expression was defined by presence of nuclear staining. The percentage scoring of the immunoreactive tumor cells was categorized into four groups: 0 (0%), 1 (1–10%), 2 (11–50%), and 3 (>50%). The staining intensity was also categorized into four groups: 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong). A final score was obtained for each case by multiplying the percentage and the intensity score. Finally, tumors with multiplied score exceeding 3 (i.e., tumors with a moderate and strong intensity of >10% of the tumor cells) was recorded as positive immunoreactivity to MGMT and p53; all the other scores were considered negative.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows Standard version 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Fisher exact test was performed to assess the relationship between the expression patterns of MGMT and p53. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

The loss of MGMT expression was detected in 11 (30.6%) out of the 36 endometrial cancers, and p53 immunoreactivity was detected in 23 (63.9%) out of the 36 endometrial cancers. Ten (90.9%) of the 11 cases with negative MGMT immunoreactivity showed positive p53 expression, whereas 1 (9.1%) of the 11 cases with negative MGMT immunoreactivity showed negative p53 expression. So the loss of MGMT expression was significantly associated with the p53 overexpression (P=0.03) (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Table 1.

Relationship between O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and p53 expressions in 36 endometrial cancers

ExpressionMGMT protein
P
Negative N=11 (%)Positive N=25 (%)
p53 protein0.03
  Negative (N=13)1 (9.1)12 (48.0)
  Positive (N=23)10 (90.9)13 (52.0)
Fig. 1.

Immunohistochemical findings of O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and p53 in endometrial cancer tissues; MGMT showed a negative nuclear and cytoplasmic immunoreactivity (A, ×400), p53 showed a positive nuclear immunoreactivity (B, ×400).

DISCUSSION

Loss of MGMT expression has been reported to have a significantly role in carcinogenesis in various organs.4 In this study, the loss of MGMT expression was detected in 11 (30.6%) out of the 36 endometrial cancers. There are studies that a lack of MGMT expression may be related to guanine to adenine mutation, and may be related to the development of gliomas,4 non-small cell lung cancers,5 and colonic cancers.6,7 However, other studies have been reported that the lack of MGMT expression in not commonly due to mutation, deletion, or rearrangement of the MGTM gene.12 Hypermethylation of CpG islands in its promoter region is the most important mechanism.13 Esteller et al. reported that the MGMT gene is epigenetically inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in many primary tumor types, and a direct relationship between MGMT aberrant methylation and G:C to A:T transition mutations of p53 in colorectal tumors.6,7 Methylated MGMT gene promoter has been associated with loss or decrease of MGMT expression in tumor tissues of various organs, including lung tumors.5,7 In lung carcinoma, 25% of non-small cell lung carcinoma and 37% of adenocarcinoma have been reported to show loss of MGMT expression.5 p53 is the most commonly mutated gene in human cancer with transition mutations being the main type of p53 mutation observed.9 Several studies that MGMT inactivation by hypermethylation has been reported to be associated with a shift from the G:C to A:T mutation in the p53 gene,10 which is known to be one of the most important tumor suppressor genes in human. Myong reported that MGMT loss associated with p53 overexpression in lung cancers, especially adenocarcinomas.14 Also, Osanai et al. reported that expression of p53 may be associated with the regulation of MGMT expression in breast tumors, and that MGMT immunonegativity and p53 immunopositivity may be strong predictors of breast cancer survival.15 However, other studies that wild-type p53 is accompanied by lower MGMT protein expression.11 In this studies that 10 (90.9%) of the 11 cases with negative MGMT immunoreactivity showed positive p53 expression, whereas 1 (9.1%) of the 11 cases with negative MGMT immunoreactivity showed negative p53 expression. So the loss of MGMT expression was significantly associated with the p53 overexpression (p=0.03). Rolhion et al. reported that MGMT gene expression was significantly lower in p53 mutated tumors, because mutations of p53 in human cancer are common and occur in all malignant cell types, the relationship observed between MGMT expression and p53 is highly relevant.4 Recently, the genetic and epigenetic pathways are not isolated, but rather a complex network of cross-talk between genetic and epigenetic factors may exist. The results of this study because it is limited to immunohistochemical test, further studies are needed to promoter methylation. These findings suggest that the loss of MGMT expression may be one of factors capable of p53 overexpression in endometrial cancer, but some follow-up is needed since this study was limited to 36 cases of well differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to define the relation between MGMT and p53 for examining the mechanisms of tissue-specific MGMT expression.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Involvement of DNA damage and repair in mutational spectra.

Authors:  G P Pfeifer
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: regulation and importance in response to alkylating carcinogenic and therapeutic agents.

Authors:  A E Pegg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Expression of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene MGMT in MER+ and MER- human tumor cells.

Authors:  A J Fornace; M A Papathanasiou; M C Hollander; D B Yarosh
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene (MGMT) expression in human glioblastomas in relation to patient characteristics and p53 accumulation.

Authors:  C Rolhion; F Penault-Llorca; J L Kemeny; F Kwiatkowski; J J Lemaire; P Chollet; F Finat-Duclos; P Verrelle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is associated with G to A mutations in K-ras in colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  M Esteller; M Toyota; M Sanchez-Cespedes; G Capella; M A Peinado; D N Watkins; J P Issa; D Sidransky; S B Baylin; J G Herman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Activity of the DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in human tumor and corresponding normal tissue.

Authors:  I Preuss; S Haas; U Eichhorn; I Eberhagen; M Kaufmann; T Beck; R H Eibl; P Dall; T Bauknecht; J Hengstler; B M Wittig; W Dippold; B Kaina
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1996

7.  Inverse correlation between the expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase (MGMT) and p53 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Takayuki Osanai; Yoko Takagi; Yoichi Toriya; Tsuyoshi Nakagawa; Tomoyuki Aruga; Satoru Iida; Hiroyuki Uetake; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Transgenic expression of human MGMT protects against azoxymethane-induced aberrant crypt foci and G to A mutations in the K-ras oncogene of mouse colon.

Authors:  N H Zaidi; T P Pretlow; M A O'Riordan; L L Dumenco; E Allay; S L Gerson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  A comparative immunohistochemistry of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and p53 in diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas.

Authors:  Qingguo Yuan; Kenichi Matsumoto; Yusaku Nakabeppu; Toru Iwaki
Journal:  Neuropathology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.906

10.  Association of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation with p53 mutation occurrence in non-small cell lung cancer with different histology, gender, and smoking status.

Authors:  Jeng-Yuan Wu; John Wang; Ji-Ching Lai; Ya-Wen Cheng; Kun-Tu Yeh; Tzu-Chin Wu; Chih-Yi Chen; Huei Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  4 in total

1.  Lower MGMT expression predicts better prognosis in proneural-like glioblastoma.

Authors:  Zhi-Cheng He; Yi-Fang Ping; Sen-Lin Xu; Yong Lin; Shi-Cang Yu; Hsiang-Fu Kung; Xiu-Wu Bian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

2.  Recent findings on epigenetic gene abnormalities involved in uterine cancer.

Authors:  Megumi Yanokura; Kouji Banno; Yusuke Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Nomura; Shigenori Hayashi; Eiichiro Tominaga; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-20

3.  Sequential treatment of phenethyl isothiocyanate increases sensitivity of Temozolomide resistant glioblastoma cells by decreasing expression of MGMT via NF-κB pathway.

Authors:  Zhigang Guo; Han Wang; Jun Wei; Liang Han; Zhaohui Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Genomic Profiling of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: Basic and Clinical Approach.

Authors:  Aliasghar Keramatinia; Alireza Ahadi; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Maryam Mohseny; Alireza Mosavi Jarahi; Narjes Mehrvar; Neda Mansouri; S A Mortazavi Tabatabaei; Abolfazl Movafagh
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-06-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.