Literature DB >> 25337441

Transcultural Adaptation of GRID Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression (GRID-HAMD) to Brazilian Portuguese and Evaluation of the Impact of Training Upon Inter-Rater Reliability.

Ricardo Henrique-Araújo1, Flávia L Osório1, Mônica Gonçalves Ribeiro1, Ivandro Soares Monteiro1, Janet B W Williams1, Amir Kalali1, José Alexandre Crippa1, Irismar Reis De Oliveira1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: GRID-HAMD is a semi-structured interview guide developed to overcome flaws in HAM-D, and has been incorporated into an increasing number of studies.
OBJECTIVES: Carry out the transcultural adaptation of GRID-HAMD into the Brazilian Portuguese language, evaluate the inter-rater reliability of this instrument and the training impact upon this measure, and verify the raters' opinions of said instrument.
METHODS: The transcultural adaptation was conducted by appropriate methodology. The measurement of inter-rater reliability was done by way of videos that were evaluated by 85 professionals before and after training for the use of this instrument.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) remained between 0.76 and 0.90 for GRID-HAMD-21 and between 0.72 and 0.91 for GRID-HAMD-17. The training did not have an impact on the ICC, except for a few groups of participants with a lower level of experience. Most of the participants showed high acceptance of GRID-HAMD, when compared to other versions of HAM-D.
CONCLUSION: The scale presented adequate inter-rater reliability even before training began. Training did not have an impact on this measure, except for a few groups with less experience. GRID-HAMD received favorable opinions from most of the participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; GRID Hamilton rating scale for depression (GRID-HAMD); reproducibility of results; transcultural adaptation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25337441      PMCID: PMC4204470     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 2158-8333


  16 in total

1.  Cross-cultural equivalence in depression assessment: Japan-Europe-North American study.

Authors:  T A Furukawa; D L Streiner; H Azuma; T Higuchi; K Kamijima; S Kanba; N Ozaki; A Aoba; M Murasaki; S Miura
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.392

2.  Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale endures.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Corruble; Patrick Hardy
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Standardizing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: past, present, and future.

Authors:  J B Williams
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression. The relationship to demographic, clinical and personality variables.

Authors:  M W Enns; D K Larsen; B J Cox
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 5.  Not as golden as standards should be: interpretation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.

Authors:  Levente Kriston; Alessa von Wolff
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Standardized rater training for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) in psychiatric novices.

Authors:  Matthias J Müller; Aleksandra Dragicevic
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  The GRID-HAMD: standardization of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Authors:  Janet B W Williams; Kenneth A Kobak; Per Bech; Nina Engelhardt; Ken Evans; Joshua Lipsitz; Jason Olin; Jay Pearson; Amir Kalali
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.659

8.  The new GRID Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression demonstrates excellent inter-rater reliability for inexperienced and experienced raters before and after training.

Authors:  Hideaki Tabuse; Amir Kalali; Hideki Azuma; Norio Ozaki; Nakao Iwata; Hiroshi Naitoh; Teruhiko Higuchi; Shigenobu Kanba; Kunihiko Shioe; Tatsuo Akechi; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 9.  Present use of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: observation on method of assessment in research of depressive disorders.

Authors:  R P Snaith
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Authors:  J B Williams
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1988-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical and Neurophysiological Features of Leprosy Patients with Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Louise Mara Giesel; Izabela Jardim Rodrigues Pitta; Raquel Custódio da Silveira; Lígia Rocha Andrade; Robson Teixeira Vital; José Augusto da Costa Nery; Mariana de Andrea Vilas Boas Hacker; Euzenir Nunes Sarno; Marcia Maria Jardim Rodrigues
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.345

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.