Pipat Luksamijarulkul1, Natkitta Aiempradit2, Pisit Vatanasomboon3. 1. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, 420/1 Ratchavithi Road, Phayathai, Ratchathevi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. 2. Naval Medical Department, Royal Thai Navy, Bangkok 10600, Thailand. 3. Department of Environmental Health Science, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of bacterial and fungal contamination on used surgical masks worn by the hospital personnel and microbial air quality in their working wards. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of 230 used surgical masks collected from 214 hospital personnel, and 215 indoor air samples collected from their working wards to culture for bacterial and fungal counts. This study was carried out at the hospital in Bangkok. Group or genus of isolated bacteria and fungi were preliminarily identified by Gram's stain and lacto-phenol cotton blue. Data were analyzed using paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient at the significant level of p<0.050. RESULTS: Means and standard deviation of bacterial and fungal contamination on inside area of the used masks were 47 ± 56 and 15 ± 9 cfu/ml/piece, and on outside area were 166 ± 199 and 34 ± 18 cfu/ml/piece, respectively, p<0.001. The bacterial and fungal contamination on used masks from hospital personnel working in the male and female medical wards and out-patient department, as well as the bacterial and fungal counts of the indoor air sample collected from the same area were relatively higher than the other wards. The predominant isolated bacteria and fungi contaminated on inside and outside areas of the used masks and air samples were similar (Staphylococcus spp. and Aspergillus spp.; respectively). For its relationship, results found that bacterial and fungal counts in air samples showed significantly positive correlation with the bacterial contamination load on outside area of the used masks, r=0.16, p=0.018 and r=0.21, p=0.003, respectively. CONCLUSION: High bacterial contamination on outside area of the used masks was demonstrated, and it showed a significant correlation with microbial air quality of working wards.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of bacterial and fungal contamination on used surgical masks worn by the hospital personnel and microbial air quality in their working wards. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of 230 used surgical masks collected from 214 hospital personnel, and 215 indoor air samples collected from their working wards to culture for bacterial and fungal counts. This study was carried out at the hospital in Bangkok. Group or genus of isolated bacteria and fungi were preliminarily identified by Gram's stain and lacto-phenol cotton blue. Data were analyzed using paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient at the significant level of p<0.050. RESULTS: Means and standard deviation of bacterial and fungal contamination on inside area of the used masks were 47 ± 56 and 15 ± 9 cfu/ml/piece, and on outside area were 166 ± 199 and 34 ± 18 cfu/ml/piece, respectively, p<0.001. The bacterial and fungal contamination on used masks from hospital personnel working in the male and female medical wards and out-patient department, as well as the bacterial and fungal counts of the indoor air sample collected from the same area were relatively higher than the other wards. The predominant isolated bacteria and fungi contaminated on inside and outside areas of the used masks and air samples were similar (Staphylococcus spp. and Aspergillus spp.; respectively). For its relationship, results found that bacterial and fungal counts in air samples showed significantly positive correlation with the bacterial contamination load on outside area of the used masks, r=0.16, p=0.018 and r=0.21, p=0.003, respectively. CONCLUSION: High bacterial contamination on outside area of the used masks was demonstrated, and it showed a significant correlation with microbial air quality of working wards.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hospital personnel; Microbial air quality; Microbial contamination
Authors: P Harber; S Barnhart; B A Boehlecke; W S Beckett; T Gerrity; M A McDiarmid; E Nardbell; L Repsher; L Brousseau; T K Hodous; M J Utell Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Pipat Luksamijarulkul; Nuchanard Kiennukul; Pisit Vatthanasomboon Journal: Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 0.267
Authors: George L Delclos; David Gimeno; Ahmed A Arif; Keith D Burau; Arch Carson; Christine Lusk; Thomas Stock; Elaine Symanski; Lawrence W Whitehead; Jan-Paul Zock; Fernando G Benavides; Josep M Antó Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kai Kisielinski; Paul Giboni; Andreas Prescher; Bernd Klosterhalfen; David Graessel; Stefan Funken; Oliver Kempski; Oliver Hirsch Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ana L Patrício Silva; Joana C Prata; Catherine Mouneyrac; Damià Barcelò; Armando C Duarte; Teresa Rocha-Santos Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Madline P Gund; Jusef Naim; Matthias Hannig; Alexander Halfmann; Barbara Gärtner; Gabor Boros; Stefan Rupf Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Steven H Ahrenholz; Scott E Brueck; Ana M Rule; John D Noti; Bahar Noorbakhsh; Francoise M Blachere; Marie A de Perio; William G Lindsley; Ronald E Shaffer; Edward M Fisher Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Ana M Rule; Otis Apau; Steven H Ahrenholz; Scott E Brueck; William G Lindsley; Marie A de Perio; John D Noti; Ronald E Shaffer; Richard Rothman; Alina Grigorovitch; Bahar Noorbakhsh; Donald H Beezhold; Patrick L Yorio; Trish M Perl; Edward M Fisher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240