Johannes Keller1, Philip Catala-Lehnen1, Antje K Huebner2, Anke Jeschke1, Timo Heckt1, Anja Lueth3, Matthias Krause1, Till Koehne1, Joachim Albers1, Jochen Schulze1, Sarah Schilling1, Michael Haberland1, Hannah Denninger1, Mona Neven1, Irm Hermans-Borgmeyer4, Thomas Streichert5, Stefan Breer1, Florian Barvencik1, Bodo Levkau6, Birgit Rathkolb7, Eckhard Wolf8, Julia Calzada-Wack9, Frauke Neff9, Valerie Gailus-Durner10, Helmut Fuchs10, Martin Hrabĕ de Angelis11, Susanne Klutmann12, Elena Tsourdi13, Lorenz C Hofbauer13, Burkhard Kleuser3, Jerold Chun14, Thorsten Schinke1, Michael Amling1. 1. Department of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. 2. 1] Department of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany [2] Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany. 3. Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany. 4. Center for Molecular Neurobiology, University of Hamburg, 20251 Hamburg, Germany. 5. Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. 6. Institute of Pathophysiology, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany. 7. 1] Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, 81377 Munich, Germany [2] German Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. 8. Institute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, 81377 Munich, Germany. 9. German Mouse Clinic, Institute of Pathology, Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. 10. German Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. 11. 1] German Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany [2] Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, 85354 Freising, Germany [3] German Center for Diabetes Research, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. 12. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. 13. Department of Medicine III, Dresden University Medical Center, 01307 Dresden, Germany. 14. Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92937, USA.
Abstract
The hormone calcitonin (CT) is primarily known for its pharmacologic action as an inhibitor of bone resorption, yet CT-deficient mice display increased bone formation. These findings raised the question about the underlying cellular and molecular mechanism of CT action. Here we show that either ubiquitous or osteoclast-specific inactivation of the murine CT receptor (CTR) causes increased bone formation. CT negatively regulates the osteoclast expression of Spns2 gene, which encodes a transporter for the signalling lipid sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). CTR-deficient mice show increased S1P levels, and their skeletal phenotype is normalized by deletion of the S1P receptor S1P3. Finally, pharmacologic treatment with the nonselective S1P receptor agonist FTY720 causes increased bone formation in wild-type, but not in S1P3-deficient mice. This study redefines the role of CT in skeletal biology, confirms that S1P acts as an osteoanabolic molecule in vivo and provides evidence for a pharmacologically exploitable crosstalk between osteoclasts and osteoblasts.
The hormone calcitonin (CT) is primarily known for its pharmacologic action as an inhibitor of bone resorption, yet CT-deficient mice display increased bone formation. These findings raised the question about the underlying cellular and molecular mechanism of CT action. Here we show that either ubiquitous or osteoclast-specific inactivation of the murineCT receptor (CTR) causes increased bone formation. CT negatively regulates the osteoclast expression of Spns2 gene, which encodes a transporter for the signalling lipidsphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). CTR-deficient mice show increased S1P levels, and their skeletal phenotype is normalized by deletion of the S1P receptor S1P3. Finally, pharmacologic treatment with the nonselective S1P receptor agonist FTY720 causes increased bone formation in wild-type, but not in S1P3-deficient mice. This study redefines the role of CT in skeletal biology, confirms that S1P acts as an osteoanabolic molecule in vivo and provides evidence for a pharmacologically exploitable crosstalk between osteoclasts and osteoblasts.
Osteoporosis represents a major public health problem, not only because of its high
prevalence, but also because osteoporotic fractures are associated with high morbidity and
mortality. At the cellular level, osteoporosis is explained by imbalanced bone remodelling,
a physiologically relevant homeostatic process mediated through bone-resorbing osteoclasts
and bone-forming osteoblasts1. On the basis of their cellular differences,
there are two distinct therapeutic options to treat osteoporosis, either osteoclast
inhibition (anti-resorptive) or osteoblast activation (osteoanabolic). Currently, the vast
majority of patients are medicated by anti-resorptive means, and there is only one
osteoanabolic treatment option so far, daily injection of parathyroid hormone (PTH) or a PTH fragment2. Since a long-term blockade of bone
remodelling may have adverse effects on skeletal integrity, one of the major goals of
skeletal research is to identify novel target proteins for osteoanabolic medication.One of the hormones considered to influence bone remodelling is calcitonin (CT), which was discovered more than 50 years ago as a calcium-lowering
factor produced by thyroidal C cells34. CT is proteolytically released from procalcitonin (PCT),
representing a humansepsis biomarker potentially enhancing sepsis severity56. CT has been shown to
exert its effects through the CT receptor
(CTR), a serpentine protein expressed
at high levels in kidney and hypothalamus78. In bone, CT exclusively binds to osteoclasts, exhibiting the
highest CTR-density, and causes cessation
of their activity. This anti-resorptive effect is especially pronounced in studies
employing salmon CT, displaying a 50-fold
higher potency than mammalian CT910. On the basis of these findings, CT was considered to represent the functional counterpart to
PTH, which physiologically activates
bone resorption by altering gene expression in osteoblasts.Although the pharmacologic actions of CT
have been studied extensively, there is a marked uncertainty about its role in mammalian
physiology1112. This is primarily based on the fact that patients with
CTdeficiency following thyroidectomy
do not display the expected osteoporosis, and that bone mineral density was found decreased
in individuals with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC)1013. In addition,
mice lacking Calca, the gene
encoding CT and its related family member
alpha CT-gene-related peptide
(αCGRP), unexpectedly displayed
high bone mass, in contrast to mice specifically lacking αCGRP141516. Importantly, although bone
resorption was increased in aged Calca-deficient mice, there was a twofold higher bone formation rate
at all ages analysed suggesting that the primary physiological function of CT is to limit osteoblast activity. These findings
did not only challenge our understanding of CT as a bone-preserving hormone, they also raised several questions of
key significance. In addition, they suggested that understanding the cellular and molecular
mode of CT action would help to identify
novel osteoanabolic treatment options.To study the impact of CT on skeletal
integrity, we generated a mouse model allowing cell type-specific deletion of two
Calcr exons encoding the
CT-binding site of the CTR. Here we show that CTR inactivation in all cell types or in osteoclasts
specifically causes increased bone formation. The indirect influence of CT on bone formation is molecularly explained by a
CTR-mediated inhibition of
Spns2 expression, encoding a
transporter for sphingosine 1-phosphate
(S1P), one of the previously
identified molecules potentially coupling bone formation to bone resorption1718. Likewise, S1P levels
are increased in bones of CTR-deficient
mice, and their skeletal phenotype is normalized by additional absence of S1P3, a S1P receptor expressed by
osteoblasts.
Results
Inactivation of the CTR
specifically affects bone formation
To understand the mechanism of CT
action on bone remodelling, we generated a floxed allele of the CTR by homologous recombination in embryonic
stem cells. As it was reported that deletion of exons 6 and 7 from the
Calcr gene causes
embryonic lethality19, we constructed a targeting vector resulting in
the insertion of loxP sites 5′ of exon 6 and 3′ of exon 7, respectively
(Supplementary Fig. 1a). After
confirming homologous recombination by Southern blotting (Supplementary Fig. 1b), we removed the neomycin
resistance cassette by Flp-mediated recombination and injected embryonic stem cells
carrying one floxed Calcr
allele into blastocysts to generate heterozygous mice. These were first mated with
CMV-Cre transgenic mice20, leading to the generation of mice
carrying a recombined Calcr
allele, independent of Cre expression. The subsequent mating of
Calcrmice resulted in
wild-type, heterozygous and Calcr-deficient animals, which were born at the expected
Mendelian ratio (Supplementary Fig.
1c,d). Since this result did not confirm the embryonic lethality of
Calcr-deficientmice
observed by others19, it was important to demonstrate loss of a
functional CTR in our model.
Immunohistochemistry confirmed the absence of the CTR protein in kidney and hypothalamus sections from
Calcr−/− mice (Fig. 1a), and binding assays employing iodinated CT demonstrated the lack of specific binding
to cultured Calcr−/− osteoclasts (Fig. 1b). In addition, CT inhibited the resorptive activity of wild-type, but not of
Calcr osteoclasts,
when these cells were cultured on dentin chips for 10 days (Fig.
1c).
Figure 1
Inactivation of the CTR
specifically increases osteoblast function.
(a) Immunohistochemistry for the CTR (stained in green) in kidney and hypothalamus (hypoth.)
sections from wild-type and Calcr−/− mice. Scale bars,
50 μm (top) and 200 μm (bottom). (b) Binding of
125I-salmon CT to osteoclasts or osteoblasts of the indicated genotypes.
The dotted red line represents nonspecific binding; n=3 cultures per group.
*P<0.05 versus wild-type. Data are representative of two independent
experiments. (c) Quantification of dentin resorption by wild-type and
Calcr− osteoclasts
differentiated in the absence or presence of CT; n=3 cultures per group. *P<0.05 versus
control. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (d) Von
Kossa/van Gieson-staining of non-decalcified spine sections from 3-month-old
female wild-type and Calcr− mice (scale
bars, 1 mm). (e) Histomorphometric quantification of the trabecular
bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV), the osteoblast number per bone perimeter
(ObN/Bpm), the osteoclast number per bone perimeter (OcN/Bpm) and the bone
formation rate per bone surface (BFR/BS). Concentrations of osteocalcin and
collagen degradation products (crosslaps) were measured in serum; n=6 mice
per group. *P<0.05 versus wild-type. (f) Histomorphometric
assessment of BV/TV, BFR/BS and serum crosslaps in 6-, 12- and 18-month-old female
wild-type and Calcr mice, and
of 6-month-old Calcr mice; n=6
mice per group. *P<0.05 versus wild-type. All error bars indicate s.d.
P values were assessed by two-tailed Student’s t-test.
After backcrossing the mutant allele into the C57Bl/6 genetic background we analysed
12 weeks old wild-type and Calcr littermates for
potential phenotypic abnormalities. Determination of blood parameters demonstrated no
alterations in mineral homeostasis (Supplementary Table 1) and ruled out the existence of hepatic (Supplementary Table 2) and renal defects
(Supplementary Table 3) in
Calcr−/− mice, which was
confirmed by histology (Supplementary Fig.
1e). Importantly, Calcr−/− mice displayed higher
circulating levels of alkaline phosphatase, suggesting increased bone formation as an
underlying cause. Therefore, we went on to analyse the skeletal phenotype of
Calcr−/− mice using
non-decalcified histology followed by static and dynamic histomorphometry. Here we
observed an increased trabecular bone mass compared with wild-type littermates, which
was solely explained by increased bone formation (Fig. 1d,e).
Since osteoporosis is most common in aged individuals, we next assessed the skeletal
phenotype of Calcr−/− mice at 6, 12 and 18
months of age. Compared with wild-type littermates Calcr−/−
mice displayed an increased trabecular bone mass together with an elevated bone
formation rate at all ages analysed (Fig. 1f). In contrast,
bone resorption was not increased in Calcr−/− mice, representing an
unexpected finding as our previous analysis of aged CT-deficient mice revealed a high bone
turnover phenotype with a more than twofold increase in bone resorption markers15.To confirm this striking difference between the two models we applied
μCT-scanning and determined porosity of the femoral cortex (Fig.
2a) and calvarial bone (Fig. 2b) in 18-month-old
mice. While only a moderate difference between wild-type and Calcr−/−
mice could be detected, we found severe cortical and calvarial porosity in
CT-deficient Calca−/−
mice that were maintained on the same genetic background. Since αCGRP−/−
mice did not display this phenotype either, we hypothesized that the observed
differences between Calcr−/− and Calca−/−
mice are explained by the fact that the latter ones additionally lack procalcitonin (PCT), a well-established sepsis biomarker,
which has been shown to interact with receptor complexes other than CT621. To address this
possibility we injected lipopolysaccharide (LPS) onto the calvaria of 6-week-old
wild-type, Calcr−/−, Calca−/−
and αCGRP−/− mice and applied
μCT scanning 1 week thereafter (Fig. 2c). As expected,
LPS treatment led to a significant increase in calvarial porosity in mice of all
genotypes, yet its effect was significantly more pronounced in Calca−/−
mice. At the histological level these differences were explained by increased
osteoclastogenesis (Fig. 2d), which led us to analyse the
effect of PCT on osteoclast
formation ex vivo. Here we found that the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts was
significantly reduced by PCT, and
most importantly the same was the case in Calcr−/− cultures (Fig. 2e). Collectively, these findings do not only suggest that
PCT can affect bone mass in a
CTR-independent manner, they
also demonstrated that the major physiological function of the CTR is to limit the activity of
osteoblasts.
Figure 2
Phenotypic differences between Calcr and
Calca mice.
(a) μCT scans of the femur from 18-month-old female Calcr and
Calca mice. Scale
bar, 500 μm. Cortical porosity for mice of the indicated genotypes is
shown on the right; n=5. *P<0.05 versus wild-type. (b)
μCT scans of the calvaria from 18-month-old female Calcr and
Calca mice. Scale
bar, 1 mm. Calvarial porosity for mice of the indicated genotypes is shown
on the right; n=5. *P<0.05 versus wild-type. (c) Calvarial
porosity induced by local LPS injection in 6 weeks old wild-type, Calcr,
Calca and
αCGRP mice;
n=5. *P<0.05 versus control. #P<0.05 versus
wild-type. (d) Osteoclast numbers in wild-type and Calca mice with
or without LPS treatment; n=5. *P<0.05 versus control.
#P<0.05 versus wild-type. (e) TRAP-positive multinucleated cells (TRAP+MNCs) per visual field
(VF) after differentiation of bone marrow cells with M-CSF and RANKL in the presence or absence of
10 M PCT; n=3; *P<0.05 versus non-treated
wild-type. Data are representative of two independent experiments. All error bars
indicate s.d. P values were assessed by two-tailed Student’s
t-test.
The CTR in osteoclasts
controls bone formation
To identify the relevant expression site mediating the inhibitory influence of the
CTR on bone formation, we
crossed Calcrmice with transgenic mice
expressing the Cre recombinase either in osteoblasts (Runx2-Cre), in the hypothalamus
(CamK2a-Cre) or in
the osteoclast lineage (Lysm-Cre)222324. The specificity of the
chosen approach was confirmed by genomic PCR amplifying the recombined allele from
different tissues and bone cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a). In addition, we performed immunohistochemistry on
hypothalamus sections (Fig. 3a) and binding assays with
cultured osteoclasts (Fig. 3b), demonstrating that
Calcrmice carrying the
CamK2a-Cre transgene
lacked the CTR only in the
hypothalamus, whereas binding of iodinated CT was decreased only in osteoclasts derived from Calcrmice
carrying the Lysm-Cre
transgene. We next analysed the skeletal phenotype of the corresponding mice at 6
months (Supplementary Fig. 2b) and 12
months (Fig. 3b) of age and found that the trabecular bone
volume was increased only in Calcrmice carrying the
Lysm-Cre transgene.
Consistent with the results from Calcr−/− mice, this phenotype
was fully explained by increased bone formation, whereas bone resorption was not
affected. These findings demonstrated that the inhibitory influence on bone formation
is mediated by the CTR in
osteoclasts, which led us to study the underlying molecular mechanisms by cell
culture experiments.
Figure 3
Control of bone formation by the CTR in osteoclasts.
(a) Immunohistochemistry for the presence of the CTR in hypothalamus sections. Scale bar,
200 μm. (b) Binding of 125I-sCT to
differentiated osteoclasts derived from mice of the indicated genotypes. The
dotted red line represents binding to Calcr osteoclasts; n=3
cultures per group. *P<0.05 versus Calcr
osteoclasts. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (c)
Quantification of BV/TV, ObN/Bpm, BFR/BS, OcN/Bpm and measurement of serum
crosslaps in 12-month-old female mice of the genotypes indicated above;
n≥5 mice per group. *P<0.05 versus Calcr
mice. All error bars indicate s.d. P values were assessed by two-tailed
Student’s t-test.
CT negatively regulates
S1P release from
osteoclasts
We first confirmed the absence of an endogenous defect of CTR-deficient bone marrow cells in terms of
osteoclast differentiation, as suggested by the previous data (Figs
1c and 2e). More specifically, we monitored
expression of two key regulators of osteoclastogenesis, Nfatc1 and Fos, during the course of differentiation and
found no difference between wild-type and Calcr−/− cultures (Fig. 4a). Similar observations were made when the bone marrow
cells were stimulated to differentiate into osteoblasts, where we did not observe
differential expression of osteogenic markers, such as Alpl, Sp7 and Bglap (Fig. 4b).
We next isolated RNA from wild-type and Calcr−/− osteoclasts treated
with CT for 6 h to perform
genome-wide expression analysis. This allowed us to identify at least 29 genes
regulated by CT specifically in
wild-type osteoclasts (Supplementary Fig.
3a). Our analysis revealed that the expression of well-established
osteoclast markers, such as Tracp5 and Ctsk, was not affected by CT administration, while the expression of
Calcr and
Crem, the two
previously known CT target genes
in osteoclasts2526, was regulated as expected (Fig.
4c). Most importantly, we identified Spns2 as a gene negatively regulated by CT specifically in wild-type osteoclasts.
Spns2 encodes a
transmembrane protein involved in the secretion of S1P2728, which has been
shown to function as an osteoanabolic factor coupling bone formation to resorption
in vitro171829. Since this raised the possibility that
the CTR-dependent control of bone
formation is mediated by reducing S1P release from osteoclasts, and since other genes with a
putative role in osteoclast to osteoblast communication (Sphk1, Bmp6, Efnb2 and Sema4d) were not differentially expressed, we focused on
Spns2 as a relevant
downstream target of CT in the
control of bone formation.
Figure 4
CT inhibits S1P release from osteoclasts.
(a) qRT–PCR expression analysis for the indicated genes during
differentiation of wild-type and Calcr bone marrow
cells into osteoclasts; n=3 cultures per group. (b) qRT–PCR
expression analysis for the indicated genes during differentiation of wild-type
and Calcr bone marrow
cells into osteoblasts; n=3 cultures per group. (c) Affymetrix
signal intensities (relative to control) for selected genes in wild-type and
Calcr osteoclasts
incubated in the absence or presence of CT; n=3 cultures per group. *P<0.05 versus
untreated Calcr osteoclasts. (d)
qRT–PCR expression analysis for the indicated genes during differentiation
of wild-type osteoclasts; n=4 cultures per group. *P<0.05 versus
day 1. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (e)
Immunohistochemistry for SPNS2
in an iliac crest biopsy section from a skeletal-intact donor. Scale bar,
20 μm. (f) Intracellular S1P concentrations in osteoclast precursors or differentiated
wild-type osteoclasts incubated with or without CT for 24 h; n=3 cultures
per group. *P<0.05 versus untreated osteoclasts. Data are representative
of two independent experiments. (g) qRT–PCR expression analysis for
Calcr, Sphk1 and Spns2 in wild-type and
Calcr osteoclasts
incubated with CT for the
indicated time; n=4 cultures per group. *P<0.05 versus control.
Data are representative of three independent experiments. (h) Extracellular
S1P concentrations in
conditioned medium of wild-type and Calcr osteoclast
precursors (Ocl prec.) or differentiated osteoclasts incubated with or without
CT for 24 h;
n=3 cultures per group. *P<0.05 versus untreated osteoclasts.
Data are representative of three independent experiments. All error bars indicate
s.d. P values were assessed by two-tailed Student’s
t-test.
Consistent with the suspected role of Spns2 in osteoclast to osteoblast communication, we
observed that its expression increased during osteoclastogenesis of wild-type cells,
in contrast to Sphk1 and
Sphk2, the two genes
required for intracellular S1P
production (Fig. 4d). Likewise, immunohistochemistry on human
bone sections revealed that SPNS2
was readily detectable in multinucleated osteoclasts at the bone surface (Fig. 4e). Consistent with the higher expression of
Spns2 in
differentiated osteoclasts, we found that intracellular S1P levels declined during the course of
osteoclastogenesis and that CT
administration significantly increased them (Fig. 4f).
Likewise, quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (qRT–PCR) confirmed that
Spns2 expression is
negatively regulated by short-term administration of CT to wild-type osteoclasts, but not to
Calcr−/− osteoclasts (Fig. 4g). As it was previously demonstrated that protein kinase A
(PKA), protein kinase C (PKC) and phospholipase C (PLC) are the major intracellular
effectors of CTR-dependent
signalling253031, we investigated which of these pathways is
involved in the transcriptional regulation of Spns2 by CT. Here we found that the inhibition of Spns2 expression by CT was abrogated in the presence of the PLC
inhibitor U-73122, but not by a
PKC or PKA inhibitor, indicating an involvement of the PLC-signalling pathway (Supplementary Fig. 3b). In addition, we
found that Spns2 protein levels
were markedly decreased after 9 h of CT administration (Supplementary Fig. 3c), thereby supporting our conclusion that
Spns2 is a direct target of
CT in osteoclasts. To
demonstrate the functional consequence of this regulation, we determined
S1P levels in the medium of
wild-type and Calcr−/− osteoclast cultures. In
both wild-type and Calcr−/− osteoclast cultures
extracellular S1P levels increased
upon differentiation, whereas CT
administration for 24 h resulted in a significant reduction only in wild-type
cultures (Fig. 4h). Taken together, these results suggested
that the CTR controls bone
formation by reducing S1P release
from osteoclasts, which led us to address the question as to which of the five known
S1P receptors3233 is involved in the regulation of bone formation
downstream of CT.
Control of bone formation by S1P3
We next determined the expression of S1pr1-5 in different tissues as well as in primary bone
cells by RT–PCR (Supplementary Fig.
4a) and during the course of their differentiation by qRT–PCR (Fig. 5a). Here we found that S1pr1 and S1pr3 were differentially expressed
during osteoblastogenesis, both increasing at early stages of differentiation. Since
S1pr1-deficient mice
die in utero34, in contrast to S1pr3-deficient mice, which do not
display obvious abnormalities35, we first analysed the skeletal
phenotype of S1pr3-deficient mice. Our histomorphometric analysis revealed
that bone remodelling parameters did not differ between wild-type and
S1pr3-deficient mice
at 3 months of age. In contrast, 8-month-old S1pr3-deficient mice displayed osteopenia and reduced bone
formation, while bone resorption parameters were unaffected (Fig.
5b). We additionally generated mice lacking S1pr1 specifically in osteoblasts, but
here we failed to detect alterations in bone mass or bone remodelling parameters at
both ages (Supplementary Fig.
4b–d). These findings identified S1P3, encoded by the S1pr3 gene, as a candidate receptor
controlling bone formation in response to S1P, which led us to utilize the S1pr3-deficient mouse model for
additional experiments.
Figure 5
S1P3 controls bone
formation.
(a) qRT–PCR expression analysis for the indicated genes in primary
osteoblasts (Obl) or osteoclasts (Ocl) at different days of differentiation (ND,
non-detectable). Data are representative of two independent experiments.
(b) Quantification of BV/TV, ObN/Bpm, BFR/BS, OcN/Bpm and measurement of
serum crosslaps in 3- and 8-month-old female wild-type and S1pr3− mice;
n=5 mice per group. *P<0.05 versus wild-type. (c)
Quantification of mineralization in wild-type and S1pr3− primary
osteoblasts differentiated for 10 days in the presence of conditioned medium from
wild-type osteoclast precursors (Ocl prec.; control) or differentiated osteoclasts
being incubated in the absence or presence of CT; n=3 cultures per group. *P<0.05 versus
control. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (d)
Quantification of mineralization in wild-type and S1pr3− primary
osteoblasts differentiated for 10 days in the absence or presence of S1P; n=3 cultures per group.
*P<0.05 versus control. Data are representative of two independent
experiments. (e) Western Blot monitoring Erk1/2 phosphorylation in wild-type and
S1pr3− primary
osteoblasts with or without S1P
treatment for 15 min (uncropped blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. 5). All error bars indicate
s.d. P values were assessed by two-tailed Student’s
t-test.
Here we first cultured primary calvarial osteoblasts from wild-type and
S1pr3−/− mice in the presence of
conditioned medium derived from osteoclast progenitors or from osteoclasts terminally
differentiated with or without CT.
After 10 days of culture we quantified matrix mineralization and found that only
conditioned medium of osteoclasts cultured without CT caused on osteoanabolic effect in
wild-type cultures, whereas S1pr3−/− cells did not respond
(Fig. 5c). Likewise, S1P significantly increased matrix mineralization in wild-type,
but not in S1pr3−/− bone marrow-derived
osteoblast cultures (Fig. 5d). Moreover, S1P treatment resulted in a rapid
phosphorylation Erk1/2 in primary
calvarial osteoblasts from wild-type, but not from S1pr3−/−
mice (Fig. 5e, Supplementary Fig. 5). To analyse immediate effects on gene expression we
treated wild-type and S1pr3−/− bone marrow cells at day
10 of osteogenic differentiation with S1P for 6 h and subsequently performed qRT–PCR for
selected genes (Fig. 6a). Similar to the effect of
CT on Calcr expression in osteoclasts,
S1P negatively regulated
S1pr3 expression in
wild-type cultures. Importantly, short-term S1P administration caused an S1P3-dependent increase in the expression of
Col1a1, Ibsp, and Smpd3, all of which are involved in
bone matrix production by osteoblasts363738, and addition of the
MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 blunted the stimulatory effect of
S1P on Col1a1 expression (Fig.
6b). Taken together, these results suggested that S1P3 is one relevant receptor
acting downstream of CT to control
bone formation.
Figure 6
S1P affects gene expression in
osteoblasts and accelerates bone turnover.
(a) qRT–PCR expression analysis for the indicated genes in wild-type
and S1pr3− osteoblasts
incubated in the absence or presence of S1P for 6 h; n=3 cultures per group.
*P<0.05 versus control. Data are representative of two independent
experiments. (b) qRT–PCR expression analysis for Col1a1 in wild-type osteoblasts
stimulated with S1P in the
absence or presence of PD98059
as indicted; n=3 cultures per group. *P<0.05 versus control.
(c) qRT–PCR expression analysis for the indicated genes in
wild-type and S1pr3− osteoblasts
incubated in the absence or presence of S1P for 6 h; n=3 cultures per group.
*P<0.05 versus control. Data are representative of two independent
experiments. (d) Von Kossa/van Gieson-staining of non-decalcified spine
sections from 6 weeks old wild-type and Sgpl1− mice. Scale
bar, 500 μm. (e) Quantification of BV/TV in 3 and 6 weeks old
female wild-type and Sgpl1− mice;
n≥3 mice per group. *P<0.05 versus wild-type. (f)
TRAP activity staining
reveals a high number of multinucleated osteoclasts (stained in red) in
decalcified spine sections from 6 weeks old Sgpl1− mice. Scale
bar, 50 μm. Quantification of OcN/Bpm is shown on the right;
n=3 mice per group. *P<0.05 versus wild-type. (g) Serum
crosslaps and PICP concentrations in 6 weeks old female wild-type and
Sgpl1− mice;
n=3 mice per group. *P<0.05 versus wild-type. All error bars
indicate s.d. P values were assessed by two-tailed Student’s
t-test.
Since S1P has been shown to induce
expression of the pro-osteoclastogenic cytokine Rankl in osteoblasts, we additionally performed qRT–PCR to
assess transcription of the genes encoding Rankl (Tnfsf11) or its decoy receptor Opg (Tnfrsf11b). While Tnfsf11 expression was induced by S1P stimulation of wild-type and
S1pr3−/− bone marrow cells,
Tnfrsf11b was not
affected (Fig. 6c). These results raised the question as to why
the suspected increase of S1P
release in Calcr−/− mice does not amplify
osteoclastogenesis. In an attempt to address this question, we took advantage of
Sgpl1−/− mice, lacking
S1P-lyase, an enzyme required
for S1P degradation39. Due to high extracellular S1P
levels, Sgpl1−/− mice display various
abnormalities and reduced life span (29 days in average). Remarkably, however, their
bone mass was progressively increasing and approximately doubled compared with
wild-type littermates in all animals reaching the age of 6 weeks (Fig.
6d,e). Of note, TRAP
activity staining combined with cellular histomorphometry demonstrated increased
osteoclastogenesis in Sgpl1−/− mice (Fig. 6f). Importantly, these osteoclasts were functionally active, as the
serum crosslaps concentrations were significantly increased, and the same was the
case for PICP, a biomarker of bone formation (Fig. 6g). These
findings fully confirm the osteoanabolic function of S1P
in vivo and suggest that an S1P-driven high bone turnover is only detectable when the
extracellular S1P level exceed a
certain threshold.
To analyse if S1P is responsible
for the high bone mass phenotype of Calcr−/− mice, we determined
S1P levels in serum and bones
of 6-month-old wild-type and Calcr−/− littermates. Here we
did not identify differences in circulating S1P levels, yet S1P concentrations were significantly increased in femur and spine
extracts of Calcr−/− mice, and the same was
the case in Calca−/− mice (Fig. 7a). We next generated mice lacking both, the CTR and S1P3, and compared their skeletal phenotype to
wild-type, Calcr−/− and S1pr3−/−
controls at 4 months of age. Here we observed the expected increase of trabecular
bone mass and bone formation in Calcr−/− mice, yet this
phenotype was not present in Calcr−/− mice additionally
lacking of S1P3 (Fig. 7b). Since it was described that daily injection of the
nonselective S1P receptor agonist FTY720 protects against ovariectomy-induced bone loss in wild-type
mice40, we further investigated whether this effect is attributable
to an S1P3-dependent
increase in bone formation. Therefore, we analysed the skeletal phenotype of
wild-type and S1pr3−/− mice that received daily
vehicle or FTY720 injections for 4
weeks, starting at the age of 3 months. FTY720 administration at a dose of
6 mg kg−1 resulted in a significantly
increased trabecular bone volume in wild-type mice, whereas S1pr3−/−
mice did not respond (Fig. 7c). Most importantly, although
osteoclast parameters were not different in the six groups of mice, the bone
formation rate was significantly increased by FTY720 administration in wild-type, but not S1pr3−/−
mice.
Figure 7
S1pr3-deficiency
abrogates the osteoanabolic effect caused by CTR deficiency or FTY720.
(a) S1P levels in serum
and bones from 6-month-old female wild-type and Calcr− mice, and in
bones from 6-month-old Calca− mice;
n=5 mice per group. *P<0.05 versus wild-type controls. (b)
Quantification of BV/TV and BFR/BS in 4-month-old female mice of the indicated
genotypes; n=5 mice per group. *P<0.05 versus wild-type.
(c) Quantification of BV/TV, BFR/BS and OcN/Bpm in 4-month-old female
mice of the indicated genotypes receiving daily injections of vehicle or FYT720 at
two different doses; n=6 mice per group. *P<0.05 versus
vehicle-treated S1pr3 mice.
#P<0.05 versus wild-type. (d)
Immunohistochemistry for S1P3 in spine sections from wild-type mice (top) and
in iliac crest biopsy sections of an individual with Paget’s disease of
bone (bottom). Scale bars, 25 μm (top) and 50 μm
(bottom). (e) Schematic representation of the proposed function of the
CTR in bone formation. All
error bars indicate s.d. P values were assessed by two-tailed
Student’s t-test.
Since these results suggested that S1P3 might be an attractive target for osteoanabolic
therapy, we further assessed whether its presence on osteoblasts is also detectable
in human bone sections. Using immunohistochemistry we found that S1P3 was detectable not only in
spine sections from wild-type mice, but also in iliac crest biopsy sections from an
individual with Paget’s disease of bone, a condition characterized by a local
increase of bone remodelling (Fig. 7d). Taken together, our
findings provide a cellular and molecular explanation for the role of CT in mammalian physiology and identify a
physiologically relevant coupling mechanism in bone remodelling that can be targeted
for osteoanabolic treatment of bone loss disorders (Fig.
7e).
Discussion
Our results have identified a cellular and molecular explanation for the previously
ambiguous role of CT in mammalian
physiology. They demonstrate that bone formation is controlled by the CTR in osteoclasts, where CT reduces S1P secretion by inhibiting Spns2 expression. In turn, the high bone mass phenotype in
mice lacking the CTR is the
consequence of locally increased S1P
levels, which is best underscored by the phenotypic rescue through additional deletion
of S1P3. These findings
are important and clinically relevant for several reasons. First, they demonstrate that
the primary physiological function of mammalianCT in bone remodelling is entirely different from its pharmacologic
action, similar to PTH, a hormone
physiologically activating osteoclastogenesis, but pharmacologically increasing bone
formation41. Second, they fully support the previously suggested role
of S1P as a factor coupling bone
formation to bone resorption, which was based on in vitro- and ex
vivo-evidence171829. Third, they have identified two promising
target molecules for an osteoanabolic treatment of bone loss disorders, and it is
important to state that the CTR and
S1P3 are both
serpentine receptors, representing the major class of target proteins for drug
development323342.Since CT was initially identified as
a potent inhibitor of bone resorption at high pharmacological doses, it has long been
considered as surprising that thyroidectomy does not cause osteopenia, and that bone
mineral density is even decreased in individuals with MTC12. During the
course of our study we identified three patients with CTdeficiency due to thyroiditis, and three
patients with high CT serum levels
due to MTC (Supplementary Table 4).
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) revealed high bone mineral density in patients
with CTdeficiency, whereas the
opposite was observed in patients with CT excess (Supplementary Fig.
6a,b). We additionally recruited 17 previously thyroidectomized individuals
(Supplementary Table 5) to perform DEXA
analyses, where we observed a significant positive correlation between bone mineral
density and time after thyroidectomy (Supplementary Fig. 6c). These findings, despite several limitations of our
analysis, are principally in agreement with the data obtained in mouse models, and they
provide further evidence for a physiological role of mammalianCT as an inhibitor of bone formation. At that
point it is again important to state that many conclusions regarding the functions of
CT are based on experiments
performed with salmon CT. This
protein shares only 50% sequence homology to humanCT, which may not only translate into different binding
characteristics to the CTR, but also
in differential effects on bone remodelling. Therefore, our findings do not at all
question the anti-resorptive effect of pharmacological salmon CT administration, they only show that mammalianCT has another influence under
physiological conditions.We and others have previously shown that mice lacking CT or one allele of the CTR display increased bone formation141519. Albeit these data already suggested that the primary
physiological function of CT is
different from its pharmacologic effect, there were still several remaining
questions43. In fact, while the homozygous deletion of exons 6 and 7
of the Calcr gene, which
encode the CTR binding site, has been
reported to cause embryonic lethality19, a CMV-Cre-mediated
deletion of the 3′-Calcr exons 13 and 14 did not result in embryonic lethality or
obvious alterations of bone remodelling, which was potentially explained by insufficient
recombination44. On the basis of these inconsistencies, it was
important that we could demonstrate loss of CTR expression and function in our mouse model by several means, and
that we could identify increased bone formation as their only phenotype. Although we do
not have a sufficient explanation for the previously described lethality of mice lacking
the Calcr exons 6 and 7, it is
important to state that one difference between the two targeting strategies is the
absence or presence of the NeoR cassette. In fact, since there are
several reports demonstrating a phenotypic influence of such an insertion454647, we have applied Flp-mediated recombination to remove the
NeoR cassette before our phenotypic analysis. Our data clearly
demonstrated that the major physiological function of the murineCTR is to limit bone formation, which led us to
address the remaining questions about the underlying cellular and molecular
mechanism.Since the CTR is known to be present
on hypothalamic neurons and differentiated osteoclasts, and since recent evidence has
suggested that it might also be expressed by terminally differentiated osteoblasts48, we specifically deleted the Calcr exons 6 and 7 in the hypothalamus, in osteoblasts or in
cells of the osteoclast lineage to uncover the cellular and molecular mechanism
explaining the inhibitory effect of CT on bone formation. The subsequent skeletal analysis demonstrated
that the presence of the CTR in
osteoclasts is required for regulating the activity of osteoblasts, thereby
contradicting the hypothesis raised by us and others that CT inhibits bone formation through a
hypothalamic relay101943. Instead, our data demonstrate that
CT and the CTR are involved in the molecular crosstalk
between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Clinically, there are several bone remodelling
disorders where increased bone formation is triggered by excessive osteoclastogenesis,
the most evident example being Paget’s disease of bone49505152. Molecularly, several tissue culture experiments together with genetic evidence from
mouse models have led to the identification of candidate molecules mediating this
function, such as EphrinB2,
BMP6, Sema4d or S1P17185354.In the light of this knowledge, we performed genome-wide expression analysis with the
aim to identify a coupling factor-encoding gene being regulated in a CTR-dependent manner. Here we did not observe an
immediate transcriptional regulation of theses genes by CT, and the same was the case for
Sphk1. In the context of
S1P this latter finding is
particularly important, as differential Sphk1 expression during osteoclastogenesis was the first
experimental evidence for S1P as a
relevant coupling factor in bone remodelling18. Instead, we observed a
CTR-dependent negative regulation
of Spns2 expression, which was
potentially important, since this gene encodes a transmembrane protein required for
S1P release from various cell
types272855. Our qRT–PCR expression analysis revealed that
Spns2 expression
increases during osteoclastogenesis, similar to extracellular S1P levels. Likewise, short-term administration
of CT to wild-type, but not to
Calcr−/− osteoclasts, caused a
significant reduction of both, Spns2 expression and extracellular S1P accumulation. Consistent with these in
vitro experiments, Calcr−/− mice displayed increased
S1P levels in bone extracts, and
their skeletal phenotype was normalized by the additional absence of S1P3. Taken together, these results
demonstrate that the indirect action of CT on bone formation is explained by locally increased S1P concentrations, thereby supporting the
concept that S1P receptors serve an osteoanabolic function.Although we cannot fully rule out a contribution of additional S1P receptors, our
results demonstrate that S1P3 is one relevant receptor required to promote bone
formation in response to S1P. While
the lack of a bone remodelling phenotype in 3-month-old S1pr3-deficient mice is potentially
explained by functional redundancy, most likely involving S1pr1 based on its differential
expression in osteoblasts, it was evident that S1pr3-deficiency blunted the effects of S1P
in vitro, but also in vivo in the context of CTRdeficiency. From a therapeutic perspective,
the finding that FTY720 causes an
S1P3-dependent
osteoanabolic effect is of particular interest, as this nonselective S1P receptor
agonist has already been approved for the treatment of individuals with multiple
sclerosis5657. In a previous study, FTY720 administration
(3 mg kg−1) was found to protect against
ovariectomy-induced bone loss due to a negative effect on osteoclast attachment to the
bone matrix40. Although we principally used the same strategy of
FTY720 administration, it is
important to clarify the three relevant modifications compared with this former
experiment. First, since we only observed a trend, and not a significant increase of the
trabecular bone volume by daily injection of FTY720 at a dose of 3 mg kg−1, we
repeated the experiment with a higher dose
(6 mg kg−1) to demonstrate an osteoanabolic
effect in wild-type mice. Second, our analysis included dynamic histomorphometry, which
enabled us to identify differential effects on bone formation caused by FTY720 administration. And third, since we
applied the same strategy to S1pr3-deficient mice, we were able to show that the osteoanabolic
effect of FTY720 administration is
mediated through S1P3.Although these results provide an important proof of principle for the therapeutic
potential of S1P receptor stimulation in osteoporotic individuals, they do not directly
translate into clinical applicability, since the dosage used for treatment of multiple
sclerosis is much lower (up to 5 mg per day) as compared with the animal
experiments. Importantly, however, while it is unlikely that FTY720 itself could be applied for osteoanabolic
treatment in humans, it might be a promising approach to develop selective S1P3 agonists and to analyse their
potential for osteoporosis therapy. The osteoanabolic potential of S1P and its remarkable influence on bone
remodelling is probably best underscored by the phenotype of Sgpl1−/−
mice. These mice have been described to display high extracellular S1P levels causing various abnormalities and
early postnatal lethality39. Moreover, a non-quantitative analysis of
their skeletal phenotype demonstrated high bone mass, which was interpreted as
osteopetrosis, that is, osteoclast dysfunction. Our histomorphometric analysis confirmed
that the trabecular bone mass is dramatically increased in all Sgpl1-deficient mice reaching the age of
6 weeks (approximately 15%). Importantly, however, the number of functionally active
osteoclasts was significantly increased towards wild-type littermates, and the same was
the case for serum PICP, indicating excessive bone formation. In conclusion,
Sgpl1-deficient mice
display high bone turnover triggering a progressive bone mass increase, which occurs
despite the existence of various organ abnormalities. These findings are in full
agreement with the suspected key role of S1P in bone remodelling and its ability to act as an osteoanabolic
molecule.Therefore, our collective findings do not only expand our current understanding of bone
remodelling, they also identify two serpentine receptors specifically regulating bone
formation. Since serpentine receptors represent the major class of target proteins for
currently available drugs, it is conceivable to speculate that the development of
CTR-specific antagonists and/or
S1pr3-specific agonists might be a
promising approach to counteract bone loss in osteoporosis or other skeletal
disorders.
Methods
Mouse models
To obtain Calcrmice a targeting construct
was generated, where we placed a Frt-neomycin-Frt-loxP cassette (kindly provided by
G. Schuetz, Heidelberg, Germany) 5′ of exon 6 and a single loxP site
3′of exon 7, the latter one being inserted by ET recombination according to
standard protocols. The construct was electroporated into embryonic stem cells R1,
which were then screened for homologous recombination by Southern blotting following
DNA digestion by Hind III. After removal of the neomycin resistance gene by
electroporating a Flp-recombinase expression plasmid (kindly provided by G. Schuetz,
Heidelberg, Germany), the targeted embryonic stem cells were injected in C57Bl/6J
blastocysts to generate chimeric mice, which were then crossed with C57Bl/6 mice to
obtain offspring with one floxed Calcr allele. These mice were either crossed to obtain
Calcrmice or with
CMV-Cre transgenic mice, resulting in an ubiquitous recombination within
the Calcr allele, as
determined by Southern blotting or PCR genotyping using two primers flanking the loxP
site between exons 7 and 8 (5′-TCCTGGGCTGCTGAGAAAGTATC-3′ and
5′-ATGTGATTGGCTGGGCACTG-3′) and one primer located 5′of the loxP
site between exons 5 and 6 (5′-AAGACAGATGGTGAGGGCTGACTG-3′). The
generation and genotyping of Calca−/−, αCGRP−/−,
S1pr1fl/fl, S1pr3−/−
and Sgpl1−/− mice has been described
previously1434353958. The same applies for mice expressing
the Cre recombinase under the control of different promoters222324. For the confirmation of cell type-specific S1pr1 inactivation, a combination of primers
(5′-GAGCGGAGGAAGTTAAAAGTG-3′, 5′-CCTCCTAAGAGATTGCAGCAA-3′
and 5′-GATCCTAAGGCAATGTCCTAGAATGGGACA-3′) amplifying either the floxed
or the recombined allele. To rule out a possible influence of genetic background, all
in vivo analyses were performed with littermate controls. Although our
initial analysis of the Calcr−/− phenotype was done with
12-week-old male and female mice, we used female mice for subsequent analyses with
ages ranging from 3 weeks until 18 months, as indicated in the respective figure
legends. Animal care and experimental procedures were performed with approval from
the animal care committees of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Immunological protein detection
Immunohistochemistry was performed according to standard protocols using polyclonal antibodies against the ratCTR (Acris), humanSPNS2 (Lifespan), humanS1P3 (Lifespan) or mouseS1P3 (Santa
Cruz), all diluted 100-fold. Human bone sections were derived from
decalcified iliac crest biopsies from an individual with M. Paget52,
or from an autopsy case of a skeletal-intact donor. These studies were approved by
the ethics committee of the Aerztekammer Hamburg. For immunohistochemistry the
rehydrated sections were pretreated with 0.1% trypsin for 30 min, and then
incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide
for 15 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Incubation with 5% BSA for
30 min was subsequently performed to block nonspecific binding.
Immunohistochemical staining with the primary antibodies was performed overnight at
4 °C. Detection was achieved with a biotinylated secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200, Dako
Cytomation) followed by incubation with a streptavidin/HRP (1:200, Dako Cytomation). Peroxidase activity was
detected using DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine
tetrahydrochloride) as chromogenic substrate (Dako Cytomation).
Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted. For western blotting, whole
cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (1% NP-40, 1% sodium desoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecylsulfate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM EDTA and 10 mM sodium phosphate) or in
CHAPS extraction buffer (50 mM Tris/Hcl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1% CHAPS, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT) containing a protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche).
Equal amounts of protein were separated on 12.5% SDS–polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF
membranes (Hybond; GE Healthcare). After
blocking with Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat dry milk,
membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies at a
dilution of 1:1,000. The antibodies were directed against Spns2 (#ARP56057; Avia Systems Biology),
β-actin (#MAB1501; Millipore), phospho-Erk1/2 (#9101; Cell Signaling Technology), or Erk1/2 (#4695; Cell Signaling Technology). Secondary
HRP-conjugated antibodies (Dako) were used at a dilution of 1:5,000.
Cell culture
Primary osteoclasts were generated as described previously59. In
brief, osteoclast precursor cells were isolated from the bone marrow of 12-week-old
mice and differentiated for 4 days in α-MEM containing 10 nM
1,25(OH)2 Vitamin
D3. For the next 6 days, they additionally received M-CSF
(20 ng ml−1) and RANKL
(40 ng ml−1) to allow terminal
differentiation. The conditioned medium was collected from day 1–4 of culture
(osteoclast precursor cells) or from day 7–10 of culture (mature osteoclasts).
Primary osteoblasts were isolated by sequential collagenase digestion from the
calvariae of 5-day-old mice and differentiated for 10 days in the presence of
25 μg ml−1
ascorbic acid and 5 mM
β-glycerophosphate59. In some cases the culture medium contained 50% of conditioned medium
from osteoclast precursor cells or mature osteoclasts (cultured either in the absence
or in the presence of 10 M CT for the last 4 days) as indicated. To
monitor effects of S1P on
osteoblasts, bone marrow cells were differentiated for 10 days in the presence of
25 μg ml−1
ascorbic acid and 5 mM
β-glycerophosphate with
or without S1P
(1 μM). For short-term treatment, cells were serum-starved overnight and
then stimulated with S1P
(1 μM) for 6 h.
Cellular assays
For binding assays mature osteoclasts were incubated for 2 h with
10 M 125I-salmon
CT in the absence or presence
of 10 M salmon CT. Bound radioactivity was released by
0.5 M NaOH and quantified
in a γ-counter. For resorption assays, bone marrow cells were plated on dentin
slices and differentiated as described above (with CT added during the last 4 days). After
staining with toluidine blue, the
resorbed area was quantified using ImageTool software. TRAP activity staining was performed as
described previously59. In brief, after removal of the medium and two
washing steps with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells were fixed with cold
methanol for 5 min.
After washing and drying, they were stained with Naphthol
AS-MX-Phosphate (Sigma) for
30 min before the number of TRAP-positive multinuclear cells per well was determined. For
pathway analyses osteoclasts were pre-incubated with inhibitors of PLC (U-73122, Sigma, #U6756; 10 μM), PKC (Chelerythrine
chloride, Sigma, #C2932; 10 μM) or PKA (H-89, Sigma, #B1427; 300 nM) for 2 h, followed by
the stimulation with 10 M CT for 6 h. Likewise, osteoblasts were
pretreated with an Erk inhibitor (PD98059, Cell Signaling Technology #9900, 50 μM) for
2 h before stimulation with 10 M
S1P for 6 h. For the
assessment of matrix mineralization in primary osteoblast cultures, cells were
stained after von Kossa, and the mineralized area was quantified using ImageTool
software. For alizarin red staining, cells were incubated with 40 mM alizarin
red staining solution (pH 4.2) for 10 min at room temperature after fixation
in 90% ethanol. To quantify
alizarin red incorporation
cells were washed with PBS and fixed in 90% ethanol for 1 h. After washing twice with distilled water,
cells were stained with alizarin red
S solution (40 mM, pH 4.2) for 10 min. Following
additional washing steps with distilled water, the cell-bound alizarin red was dissolved in 10%
acetic acid. After incubation
for 30 min at room temperature and 10 min at 85 °C, the
supernatant of a subsequent centrifugation step was neutralized with 10%
ammonium hydroxide solution and
the absorbance was measured at 405 nm.
Biochemical assays
Analysis of mineral homeostasis, kidney function and determination of metabolic and
hepatic parameters was carried out in the German Mouse Clinic as described60. All parameters were determined with a Beckman-Coulter AU 480 autoanalyzer, with the excecption of glycerol, which was measured using a kit from Randox Laboratories
(Krefeld, Germany). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure
concentrations of collagen degradation products (Crosslaps, IDS), osteocalcin (Biomedical
Technologies) and PICP (USCN Life Science). S1P concentrations were determined following HPLC analysis with
all samples being collected in silicone-coated vessels61. The samples
were transfered into siliconized glass tubes, internal standard was added and lipids
were extracted by the addition of chloroform and methanol/HCl
(99.8:0.2 v/v) after prior alkalization by 3 N NaOH. The mixture was centrifuged
(300 g, 5 min) to obtain the alkaline aqueous phase
containing S1P. The organic phase
was re-extracted with methanol,
1 N NaCl and 3 N
NaOH. The combined aqueous
phases were acidified by adding concentrated HCl and extracted twice with chloroform. The resulting organic phases were combined and
evaporated by a vacuum system. The dried lipids were redissolved in methanol. Sample analyses were performed by
rapid-resolution liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry using an
Agilent 1200 Series binary pump, a degasser and an autosampler (Agilent Technologies,
Böblingen, Germany). A quadrupole time-of-flight 6530 mass spectrometer (QTOF)
equipped with Jet-Stream technology operating in the positive electrospray ionization
mode was used for detection (Agilent Technologies). High-purity nitrogen for the mass
spectrometer was produced by a nitrogen generator (Parker Balston, Maidstone, UK).
Chromatographic separations were obtained using a Waters X-Bridge C18 separation
column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 3.5 μm particle
size, 138 Å pore size) with a Waters X-Bridge C18 guard column (4.6
× 20 mm; Waters). We chose a binary solvent system with gradient elution
consisting of eluent A (water/formic
acid; 100:0.1 v/v); and eluent B (acetonitril/tetrahydrofuran/formic acid; 50:50:0.1 v/v); and a
flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1 over 15 min.
Mass spectrometric measurements were conducted using the following ion source
conditions and gas settings for positive liquid chromatography–tandem mass
spectrometry: sheath gas temperature=300 °C; sheath gas
flow=9 l min−1; nebulizer
pressure=30 p.s.i.g.; drying gas temperature=300 °C; drying gas
flow=8 l min−1; capillary
voltage=5,400 V; fragmentor voltage=200 V; nozzle
voltage=2,000 V; and collision energy=15 V. Quantification was
performed using MassHunter Software (Agilent
Technologies). A calibration curve of analyte concentration was performed from
1–150 pmol and constructed by linear fitting using the least squares
linear regression calculation. The resulting slope of the calibration curve was then
used to calculate the concentration of the respective analyte in the unknowns.
Skeletal analysis
Before their skeletal analysis all mice were injected twice with calcein
(30 mg kg−1 body weight) 9 and 2 days before
sacrifice, which allowed a quantification of the bone formation rate by dynamic
histomorphometry62. The dissected skeletons were fixed overnight in
4% formalin and then transformed into 80% ethanol, before an initial analysis by contact Xray was performed
using a Faxitron Xray cabinet. The μCT scanning was performed using a Scanco
μCT 40 applying 55 kV, 145 μA and 200 ms integration
time. Cortical bone was delineated and evaluated automatically using the image
analysis algorithm provided by the manufacturer. The specific region for analysis of
cortical thickness was a 1-mm thick section of the central diaphysis. Bone mineral
density in patients, after obtaining informed consent, were measured in spine and
both femora using DEXA (GE Lunar Prodigy DF+14622). In a subset of individuals
structural bone parameters were determined in the left radius using high-resolution
peripheral quantitative computed tomography (Scanco Medical xtremeCT). All blood
parameters were determined by the Department of Clinical Chemistry. Exclusion
criteria for the patient study were clinically apparent hypo- or hyperparathyroidism,
Paget’s disease of bone, impaired renal function, malignancies and metastatic
bone disease, and bisphosphonate or teriparatide treatment.
Histology
Non-skeletal organs were histologically analysed in the German Mouse Clinic as
described60. All organs were fixed in 4% buffered formalin before
being embedded into paraffin. Sections of 2 μm thickness were stained
with haematoxylin and
eosin according to standard
protocols. For bone-specific analyses, dissected skeletons were fixed in 3.7%
PBS-buffered formaldehyde for
18 h and then transferred into 80% ethanol. Vertebral bodies L1 to L4 were dehydrated in ascending
alcohol concentrations, before they were embedded into methylmethacrylate. Sections of
4 μm thickness were cut in the sagittal plane using a Microtec rotation
microtome. These were stained by von Kossa/van Gieson (for static hisotmorphometry)
and toluidine blue (for cellular histomorphometry) staining procedures as
described62. To determine the bone formation rate, all mice were
injected twice with calcein 9 and
2 days before being killed. Static, cellular and dynamic histomorphometry at
trabecular bone surfaces was carried out according to the guidelines of the American
Society for Bone and Mineral Research63 using an OsteoMeasure system (Osteometrics
Inc., USA). TRAP
activity staining was performed on decalcified sections using Naphthol AS-MX phosphate (Sigma) and Fast Red Violet
LB salt (Sigma) in 40 mM acetate buffer (pH
5).
Mice treatment
For induction of calvarial porosity, anaesthetized mice were injected with
10 mg kg−1 LPS (Escherichia coli
O111:B4) onto their calvariae subcutaneously. After 6 days mice were killed and
calvariae subjected to μCT analyses as described above. For quantification of
the porosity the Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss) was used, while osteoclasts number
was determined after TRAP activity
staining as described above. Treatment of wild-type and S1pr3-deficient mice with
FTY720 was performed in
accordance to previous study40. More specifically 3-month-old mice
received daily intraperitoneal injections of FTY720 (3 mg kg−1 or
6 mg kg−1) or vehicle (PBS containing 5%
acidified DMSO and 30% BSA). After
4 weeks of treatment, the mice were analysed for their skeletal phenotype as
described above.
Expression analysis
RNA was isolated using the RNeasyMini kit
(Qiagen). For genome-wide expression analysis,
5 μg of RNA were used for first-strand cDNA synthesis. For Gene Chip
hybridization, the fragmented cRNA was incubated in hybridization solution at
45 °C for 16 h, before the Gene
Chips (Affymetrix MG 430 2.0) were washed
using the Affymetrix Fluidics Station 450. Microarrays were scanned with the
Affymetrix Gene Chip Scanner 7G, and the signals were processed using
GCOS(Affymetrix). The gene expression data have been deposited in GEO under accession
code GSE60761. For RT–PCR expression analysis, 1 μg of RNA was
reversed transcribed using SuperScriptIII
(Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s
instructions. Gene-specific primers were used to amplify fragments of
S1pr1
(5′-GGCTTATCTGGTCCCTCCTC-3′and
5′-CTTTGGCCTCAGCAAATAGC-3′), S1pr2 (5′-CCCCCTTCCATAAACAACCT-3′and
5′-CCCATACTGCCTCACCTGAT-3′), S1pr3 (5′-TCTGCTTTCACACAACAGCC-3′and
5′-GCAAGTAGCCAAGGTTGCTC-3′), S1pr4 (5′-GCAGAAGTCTCCACGTCCTC-3′and
5′-GCTGAGTGACCGAGAAGTCC-3′), S1pr5 (5′-TATGGCTGCAGCAGAAATTG-3′and
5′-TTCCTCTGTAGCCAGCCACT-3′), and Gapdh
(5′-GACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAGCAG-3′and
5′-CTCCTGTTATTATGGGGGTCTGG-3′), respectively. For qRT–PCR
expression analysis, 1 μg of RNA was reversed transcribed using
SuperScriptIII (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
qRT–PCR analysis (with Gapdh as internal control) was performed using
predesigned TaqMan gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems), with the exception of
S1pr2, where
qRT–PCR was performed using SYBR green
(5′-CGCAGGCTGGAGCTTAGGGC-3′ and
5′-GCAGGAGCTGGGTGAGCTGC-3′).
Statistical analysis
The number of samples was chosen according to established standards providing
sufficient statistical power to enable the detection of biologically relevant
differences in animal models. Mouse data were analysed by two-tailed Student’s
t-test using Excel software. All data are reported as mean±s.d. Human
data were analysed using IBM
SPSS Statistics 20. P<0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Authors contributions
T.S. and M.A. designed the research. J.K., A.K.H., A.J., T.K., M.H., I.H-B. designed and
performed experiments, P.C-L., A.L., M.K., J.A., J.S., S.S., H.D., T.H., M.N., T.S.,
S.B., F.B., B.R., E.W., J.C-W, F.N., V.G-D, H.F. M.HdA, E.T., L.C.H, B.K. analysed the
data. B.L., S.K., J.C. contributed the reagents and analytic tools.
Additional information
Accession codes: The genome-wide expression data set has been deposited in NCBI
Gene Expression Omnibus under accession code GSE60761.How to cite this article: Keller, J. et al.
Calcitonin controls bone formation by
inhibiting the release of sphingosine
1-phosphate from osteoclasts. Nat. Commun. 6:5215 doi:
10.1038/ncomms6215 (2014).
Authors: Volker Brinkmann; Andreas Billich; Thomas Baumruker; Peter Heining; Robert Schmouder; Gordon Francis; Shreeram Aradhye; Pascale Burtin Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: P C Scacheri; J S Crabtree; E A Novotny; L Garrett-Beal; A Chen; K A Edgemon; S J Marx; A M Spiegel; S C Chandrasekharappa; F S Collins Journal: Genesis Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 2.487
Authors: Antje K Huebner; Thorsten Schinke; Matthias Priemel; Sarah Schilling; Arndt F Schilling; Ronald B Emeson; Johannes M Rueger; Michael Amling Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Zohreh Khavandgar; Christophe Poirier; Christopher J Clarke; Jingjing Li; Nicholas Wang; Marc D McKee; Yusuf A Hannun; Monzur Murshed Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: David H H Molstad; Anna M Mattson; Dana L Begun; Jennifer J Westendorf; Elizabeth W Bradley Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-10-04 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Megan M Weivoda; Ming Ruan; Larry Pederson; Christine Hachfeld; Rachel A Davey; Jeffrey D Zajac; Jennifer J Westendorf; Sundeep Khosla; Merry Jo Oursler Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: L Peltier; C Bendavid; T Cavey; M-L Island; M Doyard; P Leroyer; C Allain; M De Tayrac; M Ropert; O Loréal; P Guggenbuhl Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jessika Appelt; Anke Baranowsky; Denise Jahn; Timur Yorgan; Paul Köhli; Ellen Otto; Saeed Khomeijani Farahani; Frank Graef; Melanie Fuchs; Aarón Herrera; Michael Amling; Thorsten Schinke; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Georg N Duda; Serafeim Tsitsilonis; Johannes Keller Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 8.143