Rick M Dijkhuizen1, Greg Zaharchuk, Willem M Otte. 1. aBiomedical MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands bDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA cDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stroke is a major cause of disability; however, most patients experience spontaneous partial recovery of functions in subacute to chronic phases. Poststroke loss and recovery of functions have been increasingly correlated with brain-wide alterations in the connectivity of neural networks, which is described in this review. Elucidation of the mechanisms of functional brain remodeling could reveal targets and strategies for more effective neurorehabilitation. RECENT FINDINGS: Data from recent resting-state functional MRI, electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and optical imaging studies in patients and animal models have demonstrated that loss of function after stroke is closely associated with disrupted connectivity in large-scale networks beyond the lesion territory. Restoration of functional connectivity in the surviving networks appears to be critical for functional recovery, and this may be promoted with specific therapeutic strategies, such as robot-assisted training and noninvasive brain stimulation. The adaptability of functional networks relies on the structural integrity of neuronal pathways, but the relationship between the two remains incompletely understood. Furthermore, disturbed neurovascular coupling after stroke can confound hemodynamically based measurements of functional connectivity. SUMMARY: Identification of key network processes in adaptive brain plasticity can aid in the prediction of functional outcome and the development of therapeutic interventions to support and promote recovery after stroke.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stroke is a major cause of disability; however, most patients experience spontaneous partial recovery of functions in subacute to chronic phases. Poststroke loss and recovery of functions have been increasingly correlated with brain-wide alterations in the connectivity of neural networks, which is described in this review. Elucidation of the mechanisms of functional brain remodeling could reveal targets and strategies for more effective neurorehabilitation. RECENT FINDINGS: Data from recent resting-state functional MRI, electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and optical imaging studies in patients and animal models have demonstrated that loss of function after stroke is closely associated with disrupted connectivity in large-scale networks beyond the lesion territory. Restoration of functional connectivity in the surviving networks appears to be critical for functional recovery, and this may be promoted with specific therapeutic strategies, such as robot-assisted training and noninvasive brain stimulation. The adaptability of functional networks relies on the structural integrity of neuronal pathways, but the relationship between the two remains incompletely understood. Furthermore, disturbed neurovascular coupling after stroke can confound hemodynamically based measurements of functional connectivity. SUMMARY: Identification of key network processes in adaptive brain plasticity can aid in the prediction of functional outcome and the development of therapeutic interventions to support and promote recovery after stroke.
Authors: Pavel Yanev; Peter R Seevinck; Umesh S Rudrapatna; Mark Jrj Bouts; Annette van der Toorn; Karen Gertz; Golo Kronenberg; Matthias Endres; Geralda A van Tilborg; Rick M Dijkhuizen Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-01-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Manus J Donahue; Eric Achten; Petrice M Cogswell; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Colin P Derdeyn; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Audrey P Fan; Rashid Ghaznawi; Jeremy J Heit; M Arfan Ikram; Peter Jezzard; Lori C Jordan; Eric Jouvent; Linda Knutsson; Richard Leigh; David S Liebeskind; Weili Lin; Thomas W Okell; Adnan I Qureshi; Charlotte J Stagg; Matthias Jp van Osch; Peter Cm van Zijl; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Max Wintermark; Ona Wu; Greg Zaharchuk; Jinyuan Zhou; Jeroen Hendrikse Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Aaron D Boes; Sashank Prasad; Hesheng Liu; Qi Liu; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Verne S Caviness; Michael D Fox Journal: Brain Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Fabrizio De Vico Fallani; Silvia Clausi; Maria Leggio; Mario Chavez; Miguel Valencia; Anton Giulio Maglione; Fabio Babiloni; Febo Cincotti; Donatella Mattia; Marco Molinari Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Eugenio Abela; John H Missimer; Andrea Federspiel; Andrea Seiler; Christian Walter Hess; Matthias Sturzenegger; Roland Wiest; Bruno J Weder Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 4.003