OBJECTIVES: To determine whether elderly people with different patterns of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have different long-term outcomes. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Cardiovascular Health Study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older were recruited (N = 5,888); 3,660 of these underwent MRI, and 3,230 without a stroke before MRI were included in these analyses. MEASUREMENTS: Cluster analysis of brain MRI findings was previously used to define five clusters: normal, atrophy, simple infarct, leukoaraiosis, and complex infarct. Participants were subsequently classified as healthy if they rated their health as excellent, very good, or good and as able if they did not report any limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs). Mean years of life (YoL), years of healthy life (YHL), and years of able life (YAL) were calculated over 16 years after the MRI and compared between clusters using unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 75.0. With 16 years of follow-up, mean YoL was 11.3; YHL, 8.0; and YAL, 8.4. Outcomes differed significantly between clusters. With or without adjustments, outcomes were all significantly better in the normal than complex infarct cluster. The three remaining clusters had intermediate results, significantly different from the normal and complex infarct clusters but not usually from one another. Over 16 years of follow-up, participants in the complex infarct cluster (n = 368) spent the largest percentage of their 8.4 years alive being sick (38%) and not able (38%). CONCLUSION: Findings on MRI scans in elderly adults are associated not only with long-term survival, but also with long-term self-rated health and limitation in ADLs. The combination of infarcts and leukoaraiosis carried the worst prognosis, presumably reflecting small vessel disease.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether elderly people with different patterns of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have different long-term outcomes. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Cardiovascular Health Study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older were recruited (N = 5,888); 3,660 of these underwent MRI, and 3,230 without a stroke before MRI were included in these analyses. MEASUREMENTS: Cluster analysis of brain MRI findings was previously used to define five clusters: normal, atrophy, simple infarct, leukoaraiosis, and complex infarct. Participants were subsequently classified as healthy if they rated their health as excellent, very good, or good and as able if they did not report any limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs). Mean years of life (YoL), years of healthy life (YHL), and years of able life (YAL) were calculated over 16 years after the MRI and compared between clusters using unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 75.0. With 16 years of follow-up, mean YoL was 11.3; YHL, 8.0; and YAL, 8.4. Outcomes differed significantly between clusters. With or without adjustments, outcomes were all significantly better in the normal than complex infarct cluster. The three remaining clusters had intermediate results, significantly different from the normal and complex infarct clusters but not usually from one another. Over 16 years of follow-up, participants in the complex infarct cluster (n = 368) spent the largest percentage of their 8.4 years alive being sick (38%) and not able (38%). CONCLUSION: Findings on MRI scans in elderly adults are associated not only with long-term survival, but also with long-term self-rated health and limitation in ADLs. The combination of infarcts and leukoaraiosis carried the worst prognosis, presumably reflecting small vessel disease.
Authors: Calvin H Hirsch; Paula Diehr; Anne B Newman; Shirley A Gerrior; Charlotte Pratt; Michael D Lebowitz; Sharon A Jackson Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: W T Longstreth; Alice M Arnold; Norman J Beauchamp; Teri A Manolio; David Lefkowitz; Charles Jungreis; Calvin H Hirsch; Daniel H O'Leary; Curt D Furberg Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: W T Longstreth; Corinne Dulberg; Teri A Manolio; Michael R Lewis; Norman J Beauchamp; Daniel O'Leary; Jeff Carr; Curt D Furberg Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mini E Jacob; Laura M Yee; Paula H Diehr; Alice M Arnold; Stephen M Thielke; Paulo H M Chaves; Liana Del Gobbo; Calvin Hirsch; David Siscovick; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mandip S Dhamoon; Ying-Kuen Cheung; Janet T DeRosa; Jose Gutierrez; Yeseon P Moon; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind; Clinton B Wright Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Li Xiong; Andreas Charidimou; Marco Pasi; Gregoire Boulouis; Thanakit Pongpitakmetha; Markus D Schirmer; Sanjula Singh; Emily Benson; Edip M Gurol; Jonathan Rosand; Steven M Greenberg; Alessandro Biffi; Anand Viswanathan Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Paula Diehr; Michael Diehr; Alice Arnold; Laura M Yee; Michelle C Odden; Calvin H Hirsch; Stephen Thielke; Bruce M Psaty; W Craig Johnson; Jorge R Kizer Md; Anne Newman Journal: Gerontol Geriatr Med Date: 2015-10-08