Literature DB >> 25333372

Symmetry laws improve electronegativity equalization by orders of magnitude and call for a paradigm shift in conceptual density functional theory.

László von Szentpály1.   

Abstract

The strict Wigner-Witmer symmetry constraints on chemical bonding are shown to determine the accuracy of electronegativity equalization (ENE) to a high degree. Bonding models employing the electronic chemical potential, μ, as the negative of the ground-state electronegativity, χ(GS), frequently collide with the Wigner-Witmer laws in molecule formation. The violations are presented as the root of the substantially disturbing lack of chemical potential equalization (CPE) in diatomic molecules. For the operational chemical potential, μ(op), the relative deviations from CPE fall between -31% ≤ δμ(op) ≤ +70%. Conceptual density functional theory (cDFT) cannot claim to have operationally (not to mention, rigorously) proven and unified the CPE and ENE principles. The solution to this limitation of cDFT and the symmetry violations is found in substituting μ(op) (i) by Mulliken's valence-state electronegativity, χ(M), for atoms and (ii) its new generalization, the valence-pair-affinity, α(VP), for diatomic molecules. Mulliken's χ(M) is equalized into the α(VP) of the bond, and the accuracy of ENE is orders of magnitude better than that of CPE using μ(op). A paradigm shift replacing the dominance of ground states by emphasizing valence states seems to be in order for conceptual DFT.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25333372     DOI: 10.1021/jp5084345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  4 in total

1.  Electronegativity-a perspective.

Authors:  Peter Politzer; Jane S Murray
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Hardness maximization or equalization? New insights and quantitative relations between hardness increase and bond dissociation energy.

Authors:  László von Szentpály
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  In-Situ Electronegativity and the Bridging of Chemical Bonding Concepts.

Authors:  Stefano Racioppi; Martin Rahm
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.020

4.  Electronegativity Equilibration.

Authors:  Francesco Sessa; Martin Rahm
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.944

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.