| Literature DB >> 25332715 |
Ruirui Li1, Shuyuan Cao2, Jinfeng Dai2, Li Wang2, Lei Li2, Yubang Wang2, Wenqin Yin2, Yuting Ye2.
Abstract
Chronic exposure to coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a potent inducer of toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), in the environment and food can cause liver diseases. It remains unknown whether caffeic acid derivatives (CADs) exerted protective effect on PCB-induced hepatotoxicity. We sought to evaluate the activities of 3 CADs on PCB169-induced oxidative stress and DNA damage in the liver. Male ICR mice were administered with 1 μmol/mL PCB169 at 5 mL/kg body weight for 2 weeks. The mice were given CADs by gastric gavage for 3 weeks. We found that PCB169 decreased the growth rate and reduced the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH) and GSH peroxidase (GPx). It increased the liver weight, malondialdehyde (MDA) and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels and CYP1A1 activity in the liver tissues and plasma of mice (P<0.05). Pretreatment of mice with CADs restored the above parameters to normal levels. There was a synergistic protective effect between CADs in preventing MDA and 8-OHdG formation and inducing CYP1A1 and phase II metabolism enzyme (SOD, GPx) activities (P<0.05). In conclusion, PCB169 induced hepatotoxicity and pretreatment with CADs had synergistic protective effects on liver damage.Entities:
Keywords: 8-OHdG; PCB169; caffeic acid derivatives (CADs); hepatotoxicity; synergy
Year: 2014 PMID: 25332715 PMCID: PMC4197394 DOI: 10.7555/JBR.28.20120109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Res ISSN: 1674-8301
Effect of CADs on growth rate and relative liver weight and liver CYP1A1 activities in PCB169-treated mice
| Group | Growth rate (%) | Relative liverweight (%) | Liver CYP1A1 activities(nmol/minute/mg Pro) |
| G1 (saline) | 2.41±0.25 | 12.31±0.16 | 2.59±0.13 |
| G2 (corn oil) | 2.42±0.36 | 13.01±0.17 | 2.52±0.15 |
| G3 (ChA) | 2.11±0.44 | 11.33±0.11 | 2.51±0.13 |
| G4 (FeA) | 2.20±0.15 | 11.31±0.23 | 2.07±0.15 |
| G5 (RoA) | 2.33±0.27 | 11.32±0.19 | 2.63±0.21 |
| G6 (ChA+ FeA) | 2.11±0.26 | 10.31±0.22* | 2.03±0.18* |
| G7 (ChA+RoA) | 2.01±0.37 | 10.21±0.24* | 2.09±0.22* |
| G8 (FeA+RoA) | 2.12±0.13 | 10.12±0.12* | 2.02±0.10* |
| G9 (ChA+ FeA+RoA) | 1.91±0.24 | 9.33±0.11* | 1.16±0.23* |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10). One-way ANOVA was performed to examine statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between each different combinations of CADs level and the corn oil treatment (indicated by “*” if significant). CAD: caffeic acid derivatives.
Effect of CADs on serum MDA and GSH and GSH-Px levels in treated mice
| Group | MDA (mmol/mg Pro) | GSH (mg/g Pro) | GSH-Px (U/mg Pro) |
| G1 (saline) | 2.97±0.49 | 1.71±0.24 | 71.1±1.3 |
| G2 (corn oil) | 2.93±0.55 | 2.01±0.20 | 77.3±1.2 |
| G3 (ChA) | 2.71±0.93 | 2.89±0.14* | 110.1±2.3* |
| G4 (FeA) | 2.67±0.55 | 2.62±0.12* | 113.4±2.0* |
| G5 (RoA) | 2.63±0.91 | 2.43±0.41* | 110.7±2.1* |
| G6 (ChA+ FeA) | 2.17±0.18* | 4.03±0.25* | 136.3±2.4* |
| G7 (ChA+RoA) | 2.09±0.57* | 3.93±0.15* | 130.2±2.3* |
| G8 (FeA+RoA) | 2.11±0.20* | 3.67±0.35* | 110.7±1.7* |
| G9 (ChA+ FeA+RoA) | 1.46±0.23* | 4.19±0.19* | 143.6±3.3* |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10). One-way ANOVA was performed to examine statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between each different combinations of CADs level and the corn oil treatment (indicated by “*” if significant).
Fig. 1Effect of CADs on SOD activities in the PCB169-treated mice.
One-way ANOVA was performed to examine statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between each different combination of CADs level and the corn oil treatment (indicated by “*” if significant, “#” indicates significant difference of physiological saline treatment. P<0.05). CAD: caffeic acid derivatives.
Fig. 2Effect of CADs on 8-OHdG level in the PCB169-treated mice.
One-way ANOVA was used to examine statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between each different combinations of CADs level and the corn oil treatment (indicated by “*” if significant, “#” indicates significant difference of physiological saline treatment. P<0.05).