Literature DB >> 25329793

Thioarsenic species associated with increased arsenic release during biostimulated subsurface sulfate reduction.

Valerie K Stucker1, David R Silverman, Kenneth H Williams, Jonathan O Sharp, James F Ranville.   

Abstract

Introduction of acetate into groundwater at the Rifle Integrated Field Research Challenge (Rifle, CO) has been used for biostimulation aimed at immobilizing uranium. While a promising approach for lowering groundwater-associated uranium, a concomitant increase in soluble arsenic was also observed at the site. An array of field data was analyzed to understand spatial and temporal trends in arsenic release and possible correlations to speciation, subsurface redox conditions, and biogeochemistry. Arsenic release (up to 9 μM) was strongest under sulfate reducing conditions in areas receiving the highest loadings of acetate. A mixture of thioarsenate species, primarily trithioarsenate and dithioarsenate, were found to dominate arsenic speciation (up to 80%) in wells with the highest arsenic releases; thioarsenates were absent or minor components in wells with low arsenic release. Laboratory batch incubations revealed a strong preference for the formation of multiple thioarsenic species in the presence of the reduced precursors arsenite and sulfide. Although total soluble arsenic increased during field biostimulation, the termination of sulfate reduction was accompanied by recovery of soluble arsenic to concentrations at or below prestimulation levels. Thioarsenic species can be responsible for the transient mobility of sediment-associated arsenic during sulfidogenesis and should be considered when remediation strategies are implemented in sulfate-bearing, contaminated aquifers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25329793     DOI: 10.1021/es5035206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Effect of phosphate on arsenic species uptake in plants under hydroponic conditions.

Authors:  Andrea Monroy-Licht
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Thioarsenite Detection and Implications for Arsenic Transport in Groundwater.

Authors:  Richard T Wilkin; Robert G Ford; Lisa M Costantino; Randall R Ross; Douglas G Beak; Kirk G Scheckel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Sorption of Monothioarsenate to the Natural Sediments and Its Competition with Arsenite and Arsenate.

Authors:  Huimei Shan; Jinxian Zhang; Sanxi Peng; Hongbin Zhan; Danxue Liao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Mechanism of Arsenic Partitioning During Sulfidation of As-Sorbed Ferrihydrite Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Vincent Noël; Johannes Besold; Britta Planer-Friedrich; Kristin Boye; Scott Fendorf; Gordon E Brown
Journal:  ACS Earth Space Chem       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.556

5.  Thioarsenate Formation Coupled with Anaerobic Arsenite Oxidation by a Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Isolated from a Hot Spring.

Authors:  Geng Wu; Liuqin Huang; Hongchen Jiang; Yue'e Peng; Wei Guo; Ziyu Chen; Weiyu She; Qinghai Guo; Hailiang Dong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Capability for arsenic mobilization in groundwater is distributed across broad phylogenetic lineages.

Authors:  Robert E Danczak; Michael D Johnston; Chris Kenah; Michael Slattery; Michael J Wilkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.