Literature DB >> 31525045

Thioarsenite Detection and Implications for Arsenic Transport in Groundwater.

Richard T Wilkin1, Robert G Ford2, Lisa M Costantino1, Randall R Ross1, Douglas G Beak1, Kirk G Scheckel2.   

Abstract

Arsenic toxicity and mobility in groundwater depend on its aqueous speciation. Uncertainty about the methods used for measuring arsenic speciation in sulfate-reducing environments hampers transport and fate analyses and the development of in situ remediation approaches for treating impacted aquifers. New anion-exchange chromatography methods linked to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) are presented that allow for sample/eluent pH matching. Sample/eluent pH matching is advantageous to prevent thioarsenic species transformation during chromatographic separation because species protonation states remain unaffected, hydroxyl-for-bisulfide ligand substitution is avoided, and oxidation of reduced arsenic species is minimized. We characterized model and natural solutions containing mixtures of arsenic oxyanions with dissolved sulfide and solutions derived from the dissolution of thioarsenite and thioarsenate solids. In sulfidic solutions containing arsenite, two thioarsenic species with S/As ratios of 2:1 and 3:1 were important over the pH range from 5.5 to 8.5. The 3:1 thioarsenic species dominated when disordered As2S3 dissolved into sulfide-containing solution at pH 5.4. Together with the preferential formation of arsenite following sample dilution, these data provide evidence for the formation and detection of thioarsenite species. This study helps resolve inconsistencies between spectroscopic and chromatographic evidence regarding the nature of arsenic in sulfidic waters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31525045      PMCID: PMC6824421          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  26 in total

1.  Determination of arsenic speciation in sulfidic waters by Ion Chromatography Hydride-Generation Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (IC-HG-AFS).

Authors:  Nicole S Keller; Andri Stefánsson; Bergur Sigfússon
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.057

2.  Effects of Fe-S-As coupled redox processes on arsenic mobilization in shallow aquifers of Datong Basin, northern China.

Authors:  Junwen Zhang; Teng Ma; Yani Yan; Xianjun Xie; Olusegun K Abass; Congqiang Liu; Zhiqi Zhao; Zhizhen Wang
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Determination of Anionic, Neutral, and Cationic Species of Arsenic by Ion Chromatography with ICPMS Detection in Environmental Samples.

Authors:  J Mattusch; R Wennrich
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Arsenic speciation in sulfidic waters: reconciling contradictory spectroscopic and chromatographic evidence.

Authors:  Britta Planer-Friedrich; Elke Suess; Andreas C Scheinost; Dirk Wallschläger
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Determination of (Oxy)thioarsenates in sulfidic waters.

Authors:  Dirk Wallschläger; Christopher J Stadey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  A new role for sulfur in arsenic cycling.

Authors:  Jenny C Fisher; Dirk Wallschläger; Britta Planer-Friedrich; James T Hollibaugh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  The influence of sulfur and iron on dissolved arsenic concentrations in the shallow subsurface under changing redox conditions.

Authors:  Peggy A O'Day; Dimitri Vlassopoulos; Robert Root; Nelson Rivera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Examination of arsenic speciation in sulfidic solutions using X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Douglas G Beak; Richard T Wilkin; Robert G Ford; Shelly D Kelly
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Kinetics and mechanism of As2S3(am) dissolution under N2.

Authors:  Ruxandra M Floroiu; Allen P Davis; Alba Torrents
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 2. Geochemical modeling and solid phase studies.

Authors:  Douglas G Beak; Richard T Wilkin
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.188

View more
  1 in total

1.  Response to Comment on "Thioarsenite Detection and Implications for Arsenic Transport in Groundwater".

Authors:  Richard T Wilkin; Robert G Ford; Lisa M Costantino; Randall R Ross; Douglas G Beak; Kirk G Scheckel; Peng Ho
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.